IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i22p8622-d975659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermodynamic and Economic Analyses of Zero-Emission Open Loop Offshore Regasification Systems Integrating ORC with Zeotropic Mixtures and LNG Open Power Cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Manuel Naveiro

    (Energy Engineering Research Group, University Institute of Maritime Studies, Escuela Técnica Superior de Náutica y Máquinas (ETSNM), University of A Coruña, Paseo de Ronda 51, 15011 A Coruña, Spain)

  • Manuel Romero Gómez

    (Energy Engineering Research Group, University Institute of Maritime Studies, Nautical Sciences and Marine Engineering Department, Escuela Técnica Superior de Náutica y Máquinas (ETSNM), University of A Coruña, Paseo de Ronda 51, 15011 A Coruña, Spain)

  • Ignacio Arias-Fernández

    (Energy Engineering Research Group, University Institute of Maritime Studies, Nautical Sciences and Marine Engineering Department, Escuela Técnica Superior de Náutica y Máquinas (ETSNM), University of A Coruña, Paseo de Ronda 51, 15011 A Coruña, Spain)

  • Álvaro Baaliña Insua

    (Energy Engineering Research Group, University Institute of Maritime Studies, Nautical Sciences and Marine Engineering Department, Escuela Técnica Superior de Náutica y Máquinas (ETSNM), University of A Coruña, Paseo de Ronda 51, 15011 A Coruña, Spain)

Abstract

The present study provides an energy, exergy and economic analysis of a seawater regasification system (open loop) combining stages of simple organic Rankine cycles (ORCs) arranged in series with an open organic Rankine cycle (OC) in order to exploit the cold energy of liquefied natural gas (LNG). The proposed system, termed ORC-OC, is implemented in a Floating Storage Regasification Unit (FSRU) to achieve the objective of zero greenhouse emissions during the regasification process. Configurations of up to three stages of ORCs and the use of zeotropic mixtures of ethane/propane and n-butane/propane as working fluids are considered in the study of the novel regasification system. Only the two-stage ORC-OC (2ORC-OC) and three-stage (3ORC-OC) configurations accomplish the objective of zero emissions, attaining exergy efficiencies of 61.80% and 62.04%, respectively. The overall cost rate of the latter, however, is 20.85% greater, so the 2ORC-OC results as being more cost-effective. A comparison with conventional regasification systems installed on board shows that the 2ORC-OC yields a lower total cost rate if the LNG price exceeds 8.903 USD/MMBtu. This value could be reduced, however, if the electrical power that exceeds the FSRU’s demand is exported and if compact heat exchangers are implemented.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuel Naveiro & Manuel Romero Gómez & Ignacio Arias-Fernández & Álvaro Baaliña Insua, 2022. "Thermodynamic and Economic Analyses of Zero-Emission Open Loop Offshore Regasification Systems Integrating ORC with Zeotropic Mixtures and LNG Open Power Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-24, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:22:p:8622-:d:975659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/22/8622/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/22/8622/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee, Ung & Mitsos, Alexander, 2017. "Optimal multicomponent working fluid of organic Rankine cycle for exergy transfer from liquefied natural gas regasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 489-501.
    2. Pospíšil, Jiří & Charvát, Pavel & Arsenyeva, Olga & Klimeš, Lubomír & Špiláček, Michal & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír, 2019. "Energy demand of liquefaction and regasification of natural gas and the potential of LNG for operative thermal energy storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1-15.
    3. Xue, Feier & Chen, Yu & Ju, Yonglin, 2017. "Design and optimization of a novel cryogenic Rankine power generation system employing binary and ternary mixtures as working fluids based on the cold exergy utilization of liquefied natural gas (LNG)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 706-720.
    4. He, Tianbiao & Zhang, Jibao & Mao, Ning & Linga, Praveen, 2021. "Organic Rankine cycle integrated with hydrate-based desalination for a sustainable energy–water nexus system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    5. He, Tianbiao & Chong, Zheng Rong & Zheng, Junjie & Ju, Yonglin & Linga, Praveen, 2019. "LNG cold energy utilization: Prospects and challenges," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 557-568.
    6. Lee, Ung & Kim, Kyeongsu & Han, Chonghun, 2014. "Design and optimization of multi-component organic rankine cycle using liquefied natural gas cryogenic exergy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 520-532.
    7. Bao, Junjiang & Lin, Yan & Zhang, Ruixiang & Zhang, Xiaopeng & Zhang, Ning & He, Gaohong, 2018. "Performance enhancement of two-stage condensation combined cycle for LNG cold energy recovery using zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 588-598.
    8. Sun, Heng & Zhu, Hongmei & Liu, Feng & Ding, He, 2014. "Simulation and optimization of a novel Rankine power cycle for recovering cold energy from liquefied natural gas using a mixed working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 317-324.
    9. Romero Gómez, M. & Ferreiro Garcia, R. & Romero Gómez, J. & Carbia Carril, J., 2014. "Review of thermal cycles exploiting the exergy of liquefied natural gas in the regasification process," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 781-795.
    10. Xu, Weicong & Zhao, Ruikai & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Li & Mao, Samuel S., 2021. "Is zeotropic working fluid a promising option for organic Rankine cycle: A quantitative evaluation based on literature data," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    11. Kim, Kyeongsu & Lee, Ung & Kim, Changsoo & Han, Chonghun, 2015. "Design and optimization of cascade organic Rankine cycle for recovering cryogenic energy from liquefied natural gas using binary working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 304-313.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kyle Grimaldi & Ahmad Najjaran & Zhiwei Ma & Huashan Bao & Tony Roskilly, 2023. "Dynamic Modelling and Experimental Validation of a Pneumatic Radial Piston Motor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-18, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Han, Hui & Wang, Zihua & Wang, Cheng & Deng, Gonglin & Song, Chao & Jiang, Jie & Wang, Shaowei, 2019. "The study of a novel two-stage combined rankine cycle utilizing cold energy of liquefied natural gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Sun, Zhixin & Xu, Fuquan & Wang, Shujia & Lai, Jianpeng & Lin, Kui, 2017. "Comparative study of Rankine cycle configurations utilizing LNG cold energy under different NG distribution pressures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 380-393.
    3. Bao, Junjiang & Lin, Yan & Zhang, Ruixiang & Zhang, Xiaopeng & Zhang, Ning & He, Gaohong, 2018. "Performance enhancement of two-stage condensation combined cycle for LNG cold energy recovery using zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 588-598.
    4. Domingues, António & Matos, Henrique A. & Pereira, Pedro M., 2022. "Novel integrated system of LNG regasification / electricity generation based on a cascaded two-stage Rankine cycle, with ternary mixtures as working fluids and seawater as hot utility," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    5. Lee, Ung & Mitsos, Alexander, 2017. "Optimal multicomponent working fluid of organic Rankine cycle for exergy transfer from liquefied natural gas regasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 489-501.
    6. Joy, Jubil & Kochunni, Sarun Kumar & Chowdhury, Kanchan, 2022. "Size reduction and enhanced power generation in ORC by vaporizing LNG at high supercritical pressure irrespective of delivery pressure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    7. Lee, Ung & Jeon, Jeongwoo & Han, Chonghun & Lim, Youngsub, 2017. "Superstructure based techno-economic optimization of the organic rankine cycle using LNG cryogenic energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 83-94.
    8. Liu, Yang & Han, Jitian & You, Huailiang, 2020. "Exergoeconomic analysis and multi-objective optimization of a CCHP system based on LNG cold energy utilization and flue gas waste heat recovery with CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    9. He, Tianbiao & Lv, Hongyu & Shao, Zixian & Zhang, Jibao & Xing, Xialian & Ma, Huigang, 2020. "Cascade utilization of LNG cold energy by integrating cryogenic energy storage, organic Rankine cycle and direct cooling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    10. Wang, Xiu & Zhao, Liang & Zhang, Lihui & Zhang, Menghui & Dong, Hui, 2019. "A novel combined system for LNG cold energy utilization to capture carbon dioxide in the flue gas from the magnesite processing industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    11. Lee, Inkyu & You, Fengqi, 2019. "Systems design and analysis of liquid air energy storage from liquefied natural gas cold energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 168-180.
    12. Fang, Zhenhua & Pan, Zhen & Ma, Guiyang & Yu, Jingxian & Shang, Liyan & Zhang, Zhien, 2023. "Exergoeconomic, exergoenvironmental analysis and multi-objective optimization of a novel combined cooling, heating and power system for liquefied natural gas cold energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    13. Lee, Inkyu & Park, Jinwoo & You, Fengqi & Moon, Il, 2019. "A novel cryogenic energy storage system with LNG direct expansion regasification: Design, energy optimization, and exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 691-705.
    14. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Moftakhari Sharifzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi & Rosen, Marc A., 2015. "Optimum design and exergy analysis of a novel cryogenic air separation process with LNG (liquefied natural gas) cold energy utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 2047-2069.
    15. Zhao, Liang & Dong, Hui & Tang, Jiajun & Cai, Jiuju, 2016. "Cold energy utilization of liquefied natural gas for capturing carbon dioxide in the flue gas from the magnesite processing industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 45-56.
    16. Park, Jinwoo & Cho, Seungsik & Qi, Meng & Noh, Wonjun & Lee, Inkyu & Moon, Il, 2021. "Liquid air energy storage coupled with liquefied natural gas cold energy: Focus on efficiency, energy capacity, and flexibility," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    17. Romero Gómez, Manuel & Romero Gómez, Javier & López-González, Luis M. & López-Ochoa, Luis M., 2016. "Thermodynamic analysis of a novel power plant with LNG (liquefied natural gas) cold exergy exploitation and CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 32-44.
    18. Choi, Hong Wone & Na, Sun-Ik & Hong, Sung Bin & Chung, Yoong & Kim, Dong Kyu & Kim, Min Soo, 2021. "Optimal design of organic Rankine cycle recovering LNG cold energy with finite heat exchanger size," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    19. Fahmy, M.F.M. & Nabih, H.I. & El-Rasoul, T.A., 2015. "Optimization and comparative analysis of LNG regasification processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 371-385.
    20. Qi, Meng & Park, Jinwoo & Kim, Jeongdong & Lee, Inkyu & Moon, Il, 2020. "Advanced integration of LNG regasification power plant with liquid air energy storage: Enhancements in flexibility, safety, and power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:22:p:8622-:d:975659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.