IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i18p6509-d908095.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Sand Production Prediction: An Example for a Gas-Hydrate-Bearing Sand Case

Author

Listed:
  • Jinze Song

    (Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering School, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)

  • Yuhao Li

    (Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering School, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)

  • Shuai Liu

    (Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering School, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)

  • Youming Xiong

    (Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering School, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)

  • Weixin Pang

    (State Key Laboratory of Natural Gas Hydrates, Technology Research Department CNOOC Research, Beijing 100102, China)

  • Yufa He

    (State Key Laboratory of Natural Gas Hydrates, Technology Research Department CNOOC Research, Beijing 100102, China)

  • Yaxi Mu

    (Petroleum and Natural Gas Engineering School, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)

Abstract

This paper demonstrates the applicability of machine learning algorithms in sand production problems with natural gas hydrate (NGH)-bearing sands, which have been regarded as a grave concern for commercialization. The sanding problem hinders the commercial exploration of NGH reservoirs. The common sand production prediction methods need assumptions for complicated mathematical derivations. The main contribution of this paper was to introduce machine learning into the prediction sand production by using data from laboratory experiments. Four main machine learning algorithms were selected, namely, K-Nearest Neighbor, Support Vector Regression, Boosting Tree, and Multi-Layer Perceptron. Training datasets for machine learning were collected from a sand production experiment. The experiment considered both the geological parameters and the sand control effect. The machine learning algorithms were mainly evaluated according to their mean absolute error and coefficient of determination. The evaluation results showed that the most accurate results under the given conditions were from the Boosting Tree algorithm, while the K-Nearest Neighbor had the worst prediction performance. Considering an ensemble prediction model, the Support Vector Regression and Multi-Layer Perceptron could also be applied for the prediction of sand production. The tuning process revealed that the Gaussian kernel was the proper kernel function for improving the prediction performance of SVR. In addition, the best parameters for both the Boosting Tree and Multi-Layer Perceptron were recommended for the accurate prediction of sand production. This paper also involved one case study to compare the prediction results of the machine learning models and classic numerical simulation, which showed the capability of machine learning of accurately predicting sand production, especially under stable pressure conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinze Song & Yuhao Li & Shuai Liu & Youming Xiong & Weixin Pang & Yufa He & Yaxi Mu, 2022. "Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Sand Production Prediction: An Example for a Gas-Hydrate-Bearing Sand Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-32, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:18:p:6509-:d:908095
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/18/6509/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/18/6509/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhu, Huixing & Xu, Tianfu & Yuan, Yilong & Xia, Yingli & Xin, Xin, 2020. "Numerical investigation of the natural gas hydrate production tests in the Nankai Trough by incorporating sand migration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    2. McKenzie, Jordi, 2011. "Mean absolute percentage error and bias in economic forecasting," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 113(3), pages 259-262.
    3. Machiko Tamaki & Tetsuya Fujii & Kiyofumi Suzuki, 2017. "Characterization and Prediction of the Gas Hydrate Reservoir at the Second Offshore Gas Production Test Site in the Eastern Nankai Trough, Japan," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-13, October.
    4. Wu, Hsien-Chung, 2009. "The Karush-Kuhn-Tucker optimality conditions in multiobjective programming problems with interval-valued objective functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(1), pages 49-60, July.
    5. Bjørn Kvamme & Richard B. Coffin & Jinzhou Zhao & Na Wei & Shouwei Zhou & Qingping Li & Navid Saeidi & Yu-Chien Chien & Derek Dunn-Rankin & Wantong Sun & Mojdeh Zarifi, 2019. "Stages in the Dynamics of Hydrate Formation and Consequences for Design of Experiments for Hydrate Formation in Sediments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Zhao, Jiafei & Liu, Yulong & Guo, Xianwei & Wei, Rupeng & Yu, Tianbo & Xu, Lei & Sun, Lingjie & Yang, Lei, 2020. "Gas production behavior from hydrate-bearing fine natural sediments through optimized step-wise depressurization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    7. Li, Xiao-Sen & Xu, Chun-Gang & Zhang, Yu & Ruan, Xu-Ke & Li, Gang & Wang, Yi, 2016. "Investigation into gas production from natural gas hydrate: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 286-322.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Panpan & Zhang, Yiqun & Zhang, Wenhong & Tian, Shouceng, 2022. "Numerical simulation of gas production from natural gas hydrate deposits with multi-branch wells: Influence of reservoir properties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    2. Cao, Xinxin & Sun, Jiaxin & Qin, Fanfan & Ning, Fulong & Mao, Peixiao & Gu, Yuhang & Li, Yanlong & Zhang, Heen & Yu, Yanjiang & Wu, Nengyou, 2023. "Numerical analysis on gas production performance by using a multilateral well system at the first offshore hydrate production test site in the Shenhu area," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    3. Zhang, Zhaobin & Xu, Tao & Li, Shouding & Li, Xiao & Briceño Montilla, Maryelin Josefina & Lu, Cheng, 2023. "Comprehensive effects of heat and flow on the methane hydrate dissociation in porous media," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    4. Yang, Lei & Shi, Kangji & Qu, Aoxing & Liang, Huiyong & Li, Qingping & Lv, Xin & Leng, Shudong & Liu, Yanzhen & Zhang, Lunxiang & Liu, Yu & Xiao, Bo & Yang, Shengxiong & Zhao, Jiafei & Song, Yongchen, 2023. "The locally varying thermodynamic driving force dominates the gas production efficiency from natural gas hydrate-bearing marine sediments," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    5. Liang, Wei & Wang, Jianguo & Li, Peibo, 2022. "Gas production analysis for hydrate sediment with compound morphology by a new dynamic permeability model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    6. He, Juan & Li, Xiaosen & Chen, Zhaoyang & You, Changyu & Peng, Hao & Zhang, Zhiwen, 2022. "Sustainable hydrate production using intermittent depressurization in hydrate-bearing reservoirs connected with water layers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    7. Zhao, Jie & Zheng, Jia-nan & Ma, Shihui & Song, Yongchen & Yang, Mingjun, 2020. "Formation and production characteristics of methane hydrates from marine sediments in a core holder," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    8. Jin, Guangrong & Su, Zheng & Zhai, Haizhen & Feng, Chuangji & Liu, Jie & Peng, Yingyu & Liu, Lihua, 2023. "Enhancement of gas production from hydrate reservoir using a novel deployment of multilateral horizontal well," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    9. Yin, Faling & Gao, Yonghai & Zhang, Heen & Sun, Baojiang & Chen, Ye & Gao, Dongzhi & Zhao, Xinxin, 2022. "Comprehensive evaluation of gas production efficiency and reservoir stability of horizontal well with different depressurization methods in low permeability hydrate reservoir," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    10. Na Wei & Wantong Sun & Yingfeng Meng & Jinzhou Zhao & Bjørn Kvamme & Shouwei Zhou & Liehui Zhang & Qingping Li & Yao Zhang & Lin Jiang & Haitao Li & Jun Pei, 2020. "Hydrate Formation and Decomposition Regularities in Offshore Gas Reservoir Production Pipelines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, January.
    11. Yuan, Yilong & Gong, Ye & Xu, Tianfu & Zhu, Huixing, 2023. "Multiphase flow and geomechanical responses of interbedded hydrate reservoirs during depressurization gas production for deepwater environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    12. Guo, Xianwei & Xu, Lei & Wang, Bin & Sun, Lingjie & Liu, Yulong & Wei, Rupeng & Yang, Lei & Zhao, Jiafei, 2020. "Optimized gas and water production from water-saturated hydrate-bearing sediment through step-wise depressurization combined with thermal stimulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    13. Song, Rui & Feng, Xiaoyu & Wang, Yao & Sun, Shuyu & Liu, Jianjun, 2021. "Dissociation and transport modeling of methane hydrate in core-scale sandy sediments: A comparative study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    14. Wan, Kun & Wu, Tian-Wei & Wang, Yi & Li, Xiao-Sen & Liu, Jian-Wu & Kou, Xuan & Feng, Jing-Chun, 2023. "Large-scale experimental study of heterogeneity in different types of hydrate reservoirs by horizontal well depressurization method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    15. Xu, Chun-Gang & Cai, Jing & Yu, Yi-Song & Yan, Ke-Feng & Li, Xiao-Sen, 2018. "Effect of pressure on methane recovery from natural gas hydrates by methane-carbon dioxide replacement," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 527-536.
    16. Li, Bo & Zhang, Ting-Ting & Wan, Qing-Cui & Feng, Jing-Chun & Chen, Ling-Ling & Wei, Wen-Na, 2021. "Kinetic study of methane hydrate development involving the role of self-preservation effect in frozen sandy sediments," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    17. Wu, Zhaoran & Liu, Weiguo & Zheng, Jianan & Li, Yanghui, 2020. "Effect of methane hydrate dissociation and reformation on the permeability of clayey sediments," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    18. Li, Nan & Zhang, Jie & Xia, Ming-Ji & Sun, Chang-Yu & Liu, Yan-Sheng & Chen, Guang-Jin, 2021. "Gas production from heterogeneous hydrate-bearing sediments by depressurization in a large-scale simulator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    19. Hsien-Chung Wu, 2019. "Solving Fuzzy Linear Programming Problems with Fuzzy Decision Variables," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-105, June.
    20. Zhu, Huixing & Xu, Tianfu & Yuan, Yilong & Xia, Yingli & Xin, Xin, 2020. "Numerical investigation of the natural gas hydrate production tests in the Nankai Trough by incorporating sand migration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:18:p:6509-:d:908095. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.