IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i17p6472-d906907.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental Study on the Compressive and Shear Mechanical Properties of Cement–Formation Interface Considering Surface Roughness and Drilling Mud Contamination

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China)

  • Bohang Liu

    (State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
    School of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China)

  • Hanzhi Yang

    (State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Yintong Guo

    (State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China)

  • Jing Li

    (School of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao 266580, China)

  • Hejuan Liu

    (State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China)

Abstract

In a casing-cement sheath-formation system, the cement–formation interface is usually weakly cemented for the residual of drilling mud, in which a leakage path would easily form, threatening the safe operation of underground energy exploitation and storage. To evaluate the compressive and shear mechanical behavior of the cement–formation interface, cement–rock composite cylindrical specimens were prepared. Uniaxial and triaxial compression and direct shear tests were implemented. The flushing efficiency of the rock surface, compressive strength, interface incompatible deformation, parameters of shear strength, and morphology of shear failure surface were acquired and analyzed. Results show that the flushing efficiency of shale surface decreases from 76.7% to 64.2% with the surface roughness increasing from 0 to 2 mm. The flushing efficiency of sandstone is only 44.7%, remarkably lower than that of shale. With the stress condition transforming from uniaxial to triaxial compression, the feature of the stress–strain curves changes from elastic-brittle to elastoplastic, and the compressive strength increases from 20.6~60.1 MPa to 110~120 MPa. The cement part presents noteworthy plastic deformation and several micro shear fractures develop. There is incompatible deformation between cement and rock, which induces interface debonding for almost all the composite specimens. The internal friction angle and cohesive strength both decrease with the increase in pollution degree of drilling mud, and increase with the rise in surface roughness. The shear facture surface is not exactly the rock–cement interface, but usually manifests as a shear zone, in which the rock, cement, and interface all contribute to the final shear failure. The above findings would be valuable for the revealing of cement–formation interface failure mechanism.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Wang & Bohang Liu & Hanzhi Yang & Yintong Guo & Jing Li & Hejuan Liu, 2022. "Experimental Study on the Compressive and Shear Mechanical Properties of Cement–Formation Interface Considering Surface Roughness and Drilling Mud Contamination," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:17:p:6472-:d:906907
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/17/6472/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/17/6472/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Honglin Xu & Tianshou Ma & Nian Peng & Bin Yang, 2018. "Influences of Fracturing Fluid Injection on Mechanical Integrity of Cement Sheath under Four Failure Modes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Liu, Wei & Zhang, Zhixin & Chen, Jie & Jiang, Deyi & Wu, Fei & Fan, Jinyang & Li, Yinping, 2020. "Feasibility evaluation of large-scale underground hydrogen storage in bedded salt rocks of China: A case study in Jiangsu province," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. Zhang, Nan & Shi, Xilin & Wang, Tongtao & Yang, Chunhe & Liu, Wei & Ma, Hongling & Daemen, J.J.K., 2017. "Stability and availability evaluation of underground strategic petroleum reserve (SPR) caverns in bedded rock salt of Jintan, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 504-514.
    4. Xiaogui Zhou & Haiming Liu & Yintong Guo & Lei Wang & Zhenkun Hou & Peng Deng, 2019. "An Evaluation Method of Brittleness Characteristics of Shale Based on the Unloading Experiment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-24, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bohang Liu & Lei Wang & Yintong Guo & Jing Li & Hanzhi Yang, 2022. "Experimental Investigation on the Evolution of Tensile Mechanical Behavior of Cement Stone Considering the Variation of Burial Depth," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Jingcui Li & Jifang Wan & Hangming Liu & Maria Jose Jurado & Yuxian He & Guangjie Yuan & Yan Xia, 2022. "Stability Analysis of a Typical Salt Cavern Gas Storage in the Jintan Area of China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Zhang, Xiong & Liu, Wei & Chen, Jie & Jiang, Deyi & Fan, Jinyang & Daemen, J.J.K. & Qiao, Weibiao, 2022. "Large-scale CO2 disposal/storage in bedded rock salt caverns of China: An evaluation of safety and suitability," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    4. Nan Zhang & Wei Liu & Yun Zhang & Pengfei Shan & Xilin Shi, 2020. "Microscopic Pore Structure of Surrounding Rock for Underground Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) Caverns in Bedded Rock Salt," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Wang, Junbao & Wang, Xiaopeng & Zhang, Qiang & Song, Zhanping & Zhang, Yuwei, 2021. "Dynamic prediction model for surface settlement of horizontal salt rock energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    6. Shaojie Song & Haiyang Lin & Peter Sherman & Xi Yang & Chris P. Nielsen & Xinyu Chen & Michael B. McElroy, 2021. "Production of hydrogen from offshore wind in China and cost-competitive supply to Japan," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-8, December.
    7. Salaheldin Elkatatny, 2019. "Development of a Homogenous Cement Slurry Using Synthetic Modified Phyllosilicate while Cementing HPHT Wells," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, March.
    8. Li, Hang & Ma, Hongling & Liu, Jiang & Zhu, Shijie & Zhao, Kai & Zheng, Zhuyan & Zeng, Zhen & Yang, Chunhe, 2023. "Large-scale CAES in bedded rock salt: A case study in Jiangsu Province, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    9. Usman, Muhammad R., 2022. "Hydrogen storage methods: Review and current status," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    10. Li, Jinlong & Zhang, Ning & Xu, Wenjie & Naumov, Dmitri & Fischer, Thomas & Chen, Yunmin & Zhuang, Duanyang & Nagel, Thomas, 2022. "The influence of cavern length on deformation and barrier integrity around horizontal energy storage salt caverns," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    11. Zhang, Xiong & Liu, Wei & Jiang, Deyi & Qiao, Weibiao & Liu, Enbin & Zhang, Nan & Fan, Jinyang, 2021. "Investigation on the influences of interlayer contents on stability and usability of energy storage caverns in bedded rock salt," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    12. Li, Jinlong & Shi, Xilin & Zhang, Shuai, 2020. "Construction modeling and parameter optimization of multi-step horizontal energy storage salt caverns," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    13. Chen, Wei & Liu, Jie & Peng, Wenqing & Zhao, Yanlin & Luo, Shilin & Wan, Wen & Wu, Qiuhong & Wang, Yuanzeng & Li, Shengnan & Tang, Xiaoyu & Zeng, Xiantao & Wu, Xiaofan & Zhou, Yu & Xie, Senlin, 2023. "Aging deterioration of mechanical properties on coal-rock combinations considering hydro-chemical corrosion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    14. Wei, Xinxing & Shi, Xilin & Li, Yinping & Liu, Hejuan & Li, Peng & Ban, Shengnan & Liang, Xiaopeng & Zhu, Shijie & Zhao, Kai & Yang, Kun & Huang, Si & Yang, Chunhe, 2023. "Advances in research on gas storage in sediment void of salt cavern in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    15. Aleksandra Małachowska & Natalia Łukasik & Joanna Mioduska & Jacek Gębicki, 2022. "Hydrogen Storage in Geological Formations—The Potential of Salt Caverns," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    16. Huiyong Song & Song Zhu & Jinlong Li & Zhuoteng Wang & Qingdong Li & Zexu Ning, 2023. "Design Criteria for the Construction of Energy Storage Salt Cavern Considering Economic Benefits and Resource Utilization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.
    17. Côté, Elizabeth & Salm, Sarah, 2022. "Risk-adjusted preferences of utility companies and institutional investors for battery storage and green hydrogen investment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    18. Lianchong Li & Mingyang Zhai & Liaoyuan Zhang & Zilin Zhang & Bo Huang & Aishan Li & Jiaqiang Zuo & Quansheng Zhang, 2019. "Brittleness Evaluation of Glutenite Based On Energy Balance and Damage Evolution," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-28, September.
    19. Li, Wenjing & Nan, Xing & Chen, Jiasong & Yang, Chunhe, 2021. "Investigation of thermal-mechanical effects on salt cavern during cycling loading," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    20. Abbassi, Abdelkader & Abbassi, Rabeh & Heidari, Ali Asghar & Oliva, Diego & Chen, Huiling & Habib, Arslan & Jemli, Mohamed & Wang, Mingjing, 2020. "Parameters identification of photovoltaic cell models using enhanced exploratory salp chains-based approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:17:p:6472-:d:906907. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.