IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i12p4284-d836406.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

AERES: Thermodynamic and Economic Optimization Software for Hybrid Solar–Waste Heat Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Icaro Figueiredo Vilasboas

    (Industrial Engineering Program (PEI), Federal University of Bahia, Salvador 40210-630, Brazil)

  • Victor Gabriel Sousa Fagundes dos Santos

    (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering (DEEC), Federal University of Bahia, Salvador 40210-630, Brazil)

  • Vinicius Oliveira Braz de Morais

    (Industrial Engineering Program (PEI), Federal University of Bahia, Salvador 40210-630, Brazil)

  • Armando Sá Ribeiro

    (Department of Construction and Structures (DCE), Federal University of Bahia, Salvador 40210-630, Brazil)

  • Julio Augusto Mendes da Silva

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering (DEM), Federal University of Bahia, Salvador 40210-630, Brazil)

Abstract

Heliothermic technologies are affected by their low density, intermittence and low economic competitiveness. Hybrid solar–waste heat power systems can increase plant conversion efficiency and power generation while reducing intermittence. This study focused on the development of software (AERES) to economically optimize hybrid solar–waste heat power systems in terms of technology selection, sizing, operating conditions and power block characteristics. The technologies considered for algorithm selection were (i) heat exchangers that recover a wide range of waste heat sources, (ii) non-concentrating and concentrating solar collectors (a flat plate, an evacuated tube, a linear Fresnel and a parabolic trough), (iii) organic Rankine cycle power blocks and (iv) storage tanks (direct thermal storage systems). The last two technologies were represented by surrogate models so that a large number of decision variables could be optimized simultaneously. The optimization considered local climate conditions hourly to provide irradiation, local temperature and wind speed. The case studies indicated that optimized ORCs for waste heat recovery are economically competitive, reaching internal rates of return (IRRs) of 44%, 39% and 34% for a waste heat of 50 MWt at 350 °C, 300 °C and 250 °C, respectively. On the other hand, heliothermic technologies were not selected by the algorithm and provided non-competitive results for the analyzed cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Icaro Figueiredo Vilasboas & Victor Gabriel Sousa Fagundes dos Santos & Vinicius Oliveira Braz de Morais & Armando Sá Ribeiro & Julio Augusto Mendes da Silva, 2022. "AERES: Thermodynamic and Economic Optimization Software for Hybrid Solar–Waste Heat Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:12:p:4284-:d:836406
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/12/4284/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/12/4284/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jiménez-Arreola, Manuel & Wieland, Christoph & Romagnoli, Alessandro, 2019. "Direct vs indirect evaporation in Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems: A comparison of the dynamic behavior for waste heat recovery of engine exhaust," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 439-452.
    2. Barbara Mendecka & Lidia Lombardi & Paweł Gładysz & Wojciech Stanek, 2018. "Exergo-Ecological Assessment of Waste to Energy Plants Supported by Solar Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Han, Yu & Sun, Yingying & Wu, Junjie, 2021. "A low-cost and efficient solar/coal hybrid power generation mode: Integration of non-concentrating solar energy and air preheating process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    4. Brodrick, Philip G. & Brandt, Adam R. & Durlofsky, Louis J., 2017. "Operational optimization of an integrated solar combined cycle under practical time-dependent constraints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1569-1584.
    5. Rashid, Khalid & Safdarnejad, Seyed Mostafa & Ellingwood, Kevin & Powell, Kody M., 2019. "Techno-economic evaluation of different hybridization schemes for a solar thermal/gas power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 91-106.
    6. Pantaleo, Antonio M. & Camporeale, Sergio M. & Sorrentino, Arianna & Miliozzi, Adio & Shah, Nilay & Markides, Christos N., 2020. "Hybrid solar-biomass combined Brayton/organic Rankine-cycle plants integrated with thermal storage: Techno-economic feasibility in selected Mediterranean areas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P3), pages 2913-2931.
    7. Icaro Figueiredo Vilasboas & Victor Gabriel Sousa Fagundes dos Santos & Armando Sá Ribeiro & Julio Augusto Mendes da Silva, 2021. "Surrogate Models Applied to Optimized Organic Rankine Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Behar, Omar & Khellaf, Abdallah & Mohammedi, Kamal & Ait-Kaci, Sabrina, 2014. "A review of integrated solar combined cycle system (ISCCS) with a parabolic trough technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 223-250.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gang Liu & Yuanji Li & Pan Wei & Tian Xiao & Xiangzhao Meng & Xiaohu Yang, 2022. "Thermo-Economic Assessments on a Heat Storage Tank Filled with Graded Metal Foam," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Siqueira, Mario B. & Monteiro Filho, Arthur, 2021. "Hybrid concentrating solar-landfill gas power-generation concept for landfill energy recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    2. Rovira, Antonio & Abbas, Rubén & Sánchez, Consuelo & Muñoz, Marta, 2020. "Proposal and analysis of an integrated solar combined cycle with partial recuperation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. Brodrick, Philip G. & Brandt, Adam R. & Durlofsky, Louis J., 2018. "Optimal design and operation of integrated solar combined cycles under emissions intensity constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 979-990.
    4. Bame, Aaron T. & Furner, Joseph & Hoag, Ian & Mohammadi, Kasra & Powell, Kody & Iverson, Brian D., 2022. "Optimization of solar-coal hybridization for low solar augmentation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 319(C).
    5. Okoroigwe, Edmund & Madhlopa, Amos, 2016. "An integrated combined cycle system driven by a solar tower: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 337-350.
    6. Aunedi, Marko & Pantaleo, Antonio Marco & Kuriyan, Kamal & Strbac, Goran & Shah, Nilay, 2020. "Modelling of national and local interactions between heat and electricity networks in low-carbon energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    7. Oyekale, Joseph & Petrollese, Mario & Cau, Giorgio, 2020. "Modified auxiliary exergy costing in advanced exergoeconomic analysis applied to a hybrid solar-biomass organic Rankine cycle plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    8. Ma, Chenshuo & Zhang, Yifei & Ma, Keni & Li, Chanyun, 2023. "Study on the relationship between service scale and investment cost of energy service stations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    9. Ping, Xu & Yang, Fubin & Zhang, Hongguang & Xing, Chengda & Zhang, Wujie & Wang, Yan & Yao, Baofeng, 2023. "Dynamic response assessment and multi-objective optimization of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) under vehicle driving cycle conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    10. Haddad, Brahim & Liazid, Abdelkrim & Ferreira, Paula, 2017. "A multi-criteria approach to rank renewables for the Algerian electricity system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 462-472.
    11. Pablo Emilio Escamilla-García & Ana Lilia Coria-Páez & Francisco Pérez-Soto & Francisco Gutiérrez-Galicia & Carolina Caire & Blanca L. Martínez-Vargas, 2023. "Financial and Technical Evaluation of Energy Production by Biological and Thermal Treatments of MSW in Mexico City," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-14, April.
    12. Benkaciali, Saïd & Haddadi, Mourad & Khellaf, Abdellah, 2018. "Evaluation of direct solar irradiance from 18 broadband parametric models: Case of Algeria," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 694-711.
    13. Weiguang Su & Yilin Li & Tongyu Zhou & Jo Darkwa & Georgios Kokogiannakis & Zhao Li, 2019. "Microencapsulation of Paraffin with Poly (Urea Methacrylate) Shell for Solar Water Heater," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-9, September.
    14. Middelhoff, Ella & Madden, Ben & Ximenes, Fabiano & Carney, Catherine & Florin, Nick, 2022. "Assessing electricity generation potential and identifying possible locations for siting hybrid concentrated solar biomass (HCSB) plants in New South Wales (NSW), Australia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    15. Bataineh, Khaled M., 2016. "Optimization analysis of solar thermal water pump," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 603-613.
    16. Marta Muñoz & Antonio Rovira & María José Montes, 2022. "Thermodynamic cycles for solar thermal power plants: A review," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), March.
    17. Ji, Ling & Liang, Xiaolin & Xie, Yulei & Huang, Guohe & Wang, Bing, 2021. "Optimal design and sensitivity analysis of the stand-alone hybrid energy system with PV and biomass-CHP for remote villages," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    18. Gutiérrez, R.E. & Haro, P. & Gómez-Barea, A., 2021. "Techno-economic and operational assessment of concentrated solar power plants with a dual supporting system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    19. Ponce, Carolina V. & Sáez, Doris & Bordons, Carlos & Núñez, Alfredo, 2016. "Dynamic simulator and model predictive control of an integrated solar combined cycle plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 974-986.
    20. Sara Rajabi Hamedani & Mauro Villarini & Andrea Colantoni & Maurizio Carlini & Massimo Cecchini & Francesco Santoro & Antonio Pantaleo, 2020. "Environmental and Economic Analysis of an Anaerobic Co-Digestion Power Plant Integrated with a Compost Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:12:p:4284-:d:836406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.