IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i7p1881-d526106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Blockchain Technology Applied to Energy Demand Response Service Tracking and Data Sharing

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandre Lucas

    (European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via E. Fermi 2749, I-21027 Ispra, Italy)

  • Dimitrios Geneiatakis

    (European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via E. Fermi 2749, I-21027 Ispra, Italy)

  • Yannis Soupionis

    (European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via E. Fermi 2749, I-21027 Ispra, Italy)

  • Igor Nai-Fovino

    (European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via E. Fermi 2749, I-21027 Ispra, Italy)

  • Evangelos Kotsakis

    (European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via E. Fermi 2749, I-21027 Ispra, Italy)

Abstract

Demand response (DR) services have the potential to enable large penetration of renewable energy by adjusting load consumption, thus providing balancing support to the grid. The success of such load flexibility provided by industry, communities, or prosumers and its integration in electricity markets, will depend on a redesign and adaptation of the current interactions between participants. New challenges are, however, bound to appear with the large scale contribution of smaller assets to flexibility, including, among others, the dispatch coordination, the validation of delivery of the DR provision, and the corresponding settlement of contracts, while assuring secured data access among interested parties. In this study we applied distributed ledger (DLT)/blockchain technology to securely track DR provision, focusing on the validation aspect, assuring data integrity, origin, fast registry, and sharing within a permissioned system, between all relevant parties (including transmission system operators (TSOs), aggregators, distribution system operators (DSOs), balance responsible parties (BRP), and prosumers). We propose a framework for DR registry and implemented it as a proof of concept on Hyperledger Fabric, using real assets in a laboratory environment, in order to study its feasibility and performance. The lab set up includes a 450 kW energy storage system, scheduled to provide DR services, upon a system operator request and the corresponding validations and verifications are done, followed by the publication on a blockchain. Results show the end to end execution time remained below 1 s, when below 32 requests/sec. The smart contract memory utilization did not surpass 1% for both active and passive nodes and the peer CPU utilization, remained below 5% in all cases simulated (3, 10, and 28 nodes). Smart Contract CPU utilization remained stable, below 1% in all cases. The performance of the implementation showed scalable results, which enables real world adoption of DLT in supporting the development of flexibility markets, with the advantages of blockchain technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandre Lucas & Dimitrios Geneiatakis & Yannis Soupionis & Igor Nai-Fovino & Evangelos Kotsakis, 2021. "Blockchain Technology Applied to Energy Demand Response Service Tracking and Data Sharing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:7:p:1881-:d:526106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/7/1881/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/7/1881/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mengelkamp, Esther & Gärttner, Johannes & Rock, Kerstin & Kessler, Scott & Orsini, Lawrence & Weinhardt, Christof, 2018. "Designing microgrid energy markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 870-880.
    2. Andoni, Merlinda & Robu, Valentin & Flynn, David & Abram, Simone & Geach, Dale & Jenkins, David & McCallum, Peter & Peacock, Andrew, 2019. "Blockchain technology in the energy sector: A systematic review of challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 143-174.
    3. Seong-Kyu Kim & Jun-Ho Huh, 2018. "A Study on the Improvement of Smart Grid Security Performance and Blockchain Smart Grid Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Loup-Noé Lévy & Jérémie Bosom & Guillaume Guerard & Soufian Ben Amor & Marc Bui & Hai Tran, 2022. "DevOps Model Appproach for Monitoring Smart Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-27, July.
    2. Hani Alshahrani & Noman Islam & Darakhshan Syed & Adel Sulaiman & Mana Saleh Al Reshan & Khairan Rajab & Asadullah Shaikh & Jaweed Shuja-Uddin & Aadar Soomro, 2023. "Sustainability in Blockchain: A Systematic Literature Review on Scalability and Power Consumption Issues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-24, February.
    3. Marco Vittorio Ecclesia & João Santos & Paul E. Brockway & Tiago Domingos, 2022. "A Comprehensive Societal Energy Return on Investment Study of Portugal Reveals a Low but Stable Value," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Maarten Evens & Patricia Ercoli & Alessia Arteconi, 2023. "Blockchain-Enabled Microgrids: Toward Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading and Flexible Demand Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-24, September.
    5. Yue Wu & Junxiang Li & Jin Gao, 2021. "Real-Time Bidding Model of Cryptocurrency Energy Trading Platform," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahl, A. & Yarime, M. & Goto, M. & Chopra, Shauhrat S. & Kumar, Nallapaneni Manoj. & Tanaka, K. & Sagawa, D., 2020. "Exploring blockchain for the energy transition: Opportunities and challenges based on a case study in Japan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    2. Koasidis, Konstantinos & Marinakis, Vangelis & Nikas, Alexandros & Chira, Katerina & Flamos, Alexandros & Doukas, Haris, 2022. "Monetising behavioural change as a policy measure to support energy management in the residential sector: A case study in Greece," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    3. Akhil Joseph & Patil Balachandra, 2020. "Energy Internet, the Future Electricity System: Overview, Concept, Model Structure, and Mechanism," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-26, August.
    4. Soto, Esteban A. & Bosman, Lisa B. & Wollega, Ebisa & Leon-Salas, Walter D., 2021. "Peer-to-peer energy trading: A review of the literature," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    5. Bischi, Aldo & Basile, Mariano & Poli, Davide & Vallati, Carlo & Miliani, Francesco & Caposciutti, Gianluca & Marracci, Mirko & Dini, Gianluca & Desideri, Umberto, 2021. "Enabling low-voltage, peer-to-peer, quasi-real-time electricity markets through consortium blockchains," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    6. Esmat, Ayman & de Vos, Martijn & Ghiassi-Farrokhfal, Yashar & Palensky, Peter & Epema, Dick, 2021. "A novel decentralized platform for peer-to-peer energy trading market with blockchain technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    7. Kouhizadeh, Mahtab & Saberi, Sara & Sarkis, Joseph, 2021. "Blockchain technology and the sustainable supply chain: Theoretically exploring adoption barriers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    8. Tseng, Fang-Mei & Palma Gil, Eunice Ina N. & Lu, Louis Y.Y., 2021. "Developmental trajectories of blockchain research and its major subfields," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    9. Capper, Timothy & Gorbatcheva, Anna & Mustafa, Mustafa A. & Bahloul, Mohamed & Schwidtal, Jan Marc & Chitchyan, Ruzanna & Andoni, Merlinda & Robu, Valentin & Montakhabi, Mehdi & Scott, Ian J. & Franci, 2022. "Peer-to-peer, community self-consumption, and transactive energy: A systematic literature review of local energy market models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    10. Wenting Zhao & Jun Lv & Xilong Yao & Juanjuan Zhao & Zhixin Jin & Yan Qiang & Zheng Che & Chunwu Wei, 2019. "Consortium Blockchain-Based Microgrid Market Transaction Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-22, October.
    11. Zhenya Ji & Zishan Guo & Hao Li & Qi Wang, 2021. "Automated Scheduling Approach under Smart Contract for Remote Wind Farms with Power-to-Gas Systems in Multiple Energy Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    12. Milad Afzalan & Farrokh Jazizadeh, 2021. "Quantification of Demand-Supply Balancing Capacity among Prosumers and Consumers: Community Self-Sufficiency Assessment for Energy Trading," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    13. Jun-Ho Huh & Seong-Kyu Kim, 2019. "The Blockchain Consensus Algorithm for Viable Management of New and Renewable Energies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-26, June.
    14. Soto, Esteban A. & Bosman, Lisa B. & Wollega, Ebisa & Leon-Salas, Walter D., 2022. "Comparison of net-metering with peer-to-peer models using the grid and electric vehicles for the electricity exchange," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    15. Wang, Longze & Liu, Jinxin & Yuan, Rongfang & Wu, Jing & Zhang, Delong & Zhang, Yan & Li, Meicheng, 2020. "Adaptive bidding strategy for real-time energy management in multi-energy market enhanced by blockchain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    16. Schwidtal, J.M. & Piccini, P. & Troncia, M. & Chitchyan, R. & Montakhabi, M. & Francis, C. & Gorbatcheva, A. & Capper, T. & Mustafa, M.A. & Andoni, M. & Robu, V. & Bahloul, M. & Scott, I.J. & Mbavarir, 2023. "Emerging business models in local energy markets: A systematic review of peer-to-peer, community self-consumption, and transactive energy models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    17. Oprea, Simona-Vasilica & Bâra, Adela, 2021. "Devising a trading mechanism with a joint price adjustment for local electricity markets using blockchain. Insights for policy makers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    18. van Leeuwen, Gijs & AlSkaif, Tarek & Gibescu, Madeleine & van Sark, Wilfried, 2020. "An integrated blockchain-based energy management platform with bilateral trading for microgrid communities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    19. Teng, Sin Yong & Touš, Michal & Leong, Wei Dong & How, Bing Shen & Lam, Hon Loong & Máša, Vítězslav, 2021. "Recent advances on industrial data-driven energy savings: Digital twins and infrastructures," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    20. Christie Etukudor & Benoit Couraud & Valentin Robu & Wolf-Gerrit Früh & David Flynn & Chinonso Okereke, 2020. "Automated Negotiation for Peer-to-Peer Electricity Trading in Local Energy Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:7:p:1881-:d:526106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.