IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i4p807-d492615.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generational Portrait of Spanish Society in the Face of Climate Change. A Question to Consider for the Green Economy under the Well-Being Approach

Author

Listed:
  • María-José Foncubierta-Rodríguez

    (Department of Business Organization, University of Cádiz, 11202 Algeciras, Spain)

  • Rafael Ravina-Ripoll

    (Department of Business Organization and INDESS, University of Cádiz, 11405 Jerez de la Frontera, Spain)

  • José Antonio López-Sánchez

    (Department of History, Geography and Philosophy and INDESS, University of Cádiz, 11405 Jerez de la Frontera, Spain)

Abstract

Climate change is emerging as an issue of progressive attention, and therefore awareness, in societies. In this work, the problem is addressed from a generational perspective in Spanish society and is carried out from the approaches of awareness, human action, and self-responsibility. All this from the search of the subjective well-being and the citizens’ happiness, as one of the bases of sustainable development initiatives. With data from the European Social Survey R8, from EUROSTAT, we work in two phases: (1) descriptive and inferential on possible associations of the items with the variable Age, and (2) calculation of probabilities between groups through logistic regression. The results confirm a general awareness, but with apparent statistical differences between age groups. In general, the youngest are the most aware, blame human activity most intensely, are the most concerned, and are the most willing to act. And it is the older people who are less aware of all these issues. Based on this finding, and from the approach mentioned above, it is recommended that leaders, both in the macroeconomic and microeconomic sectors, develop initiatives that sensitize and encourage older age groups.

Suggested Citation

  • María-José Foncubierta-Rodríguez & Rafael Ravina-Ripoll & José Antonio López-Sánchez, 2021. "Generational Portrait of Spanish Society in the Face of Climate Change. A Question to Consider for the Green Economy under the Well-Being Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:4:p:807-:d:492615
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/4/807/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/4/807/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rosario Ferrara, 2015. "The Smart City and the Green Economy in Europe: A Critical Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-11, May.
    2. Peter U. Clark & Jeremy D. Shakun & Shaun A. Marcott & Alan C. Mix & Michael Eby & Scott Kulp & Anders Levermann & Glenn A. Milne & Patrik L. Pfister & Benjamin D. Santer & Daniel P. Schrag & Susan So, 2016. "Consequences of twenty-first-century policy for multi-millennial climate and sea-level change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(4), pages 360-369, April.
    3. N. W. Arnell & J. A. Lowe & S. Brown & S. N. Gosling & P. Gottschalk & J. Hinkel & B. Lloyd-Hughes & R. J. Nicholls & T. J. Osborn & T. M. Osborne & G. A. Rose & P. Smith & R. F. Warren, 2013. "A global assessment of the effects of climate policy on the impacts of climate change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 3(5), pages 512-519, May.
    4. Jose R. Rubio-Valverde & Wilma J. Nusselder & Johan P. Mackenbach, 2019. "Educational inequalities in Global Activity Limitation Indicator disability in 28 European Countries: Does the choice of survey matter?," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 64(3), pages 461-474, April.
    5. Serhiy Lyeonov & Tetyana Pimonenko & Yuriy Bilan & Dalia Štreimikienė & Grzegorz Mentel, 2019. "Assessment of Green Investments’ Impact on Sustainable Development: Linking Gross Domestic Product Per Capita, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Renewable Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-12, October.
    6. Cristina Gómez-Román & Maria Luisa Lima & Gloria Seoane & Mónica Alzate & Marcos Dono & José-Manuel Sabucedo, 2020. "Testing Common Knowledge: Are Northern Europeans and Millennials More Concerned about the Environment?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gloria Jiménez-Marín & Rodrigo Elías Zambrano & Araceli Galiano-Coronil & Rafael Ravina-Ripoll, 2021. "Business and Energy Efficiency in the Age of Industry 4.0: The Hulten, Broweus and Van Dijk Sensory Marketing Model Applied to Spanish Textile Stores during the COVID-19 Crisis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-10, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aleksandra Kuzior & Aleksy Kwilinski & Ihor Hroznyi, 2021. "The Factorial-Reflexive Approach to Diagnosing the Executors’ and Contractors’ Attitude to Achieving the Objectives by Energy Supplying Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Wang, Xiuli, 2023. "Exploring the role of resource industry dependence and green finance in green development efficiency in the context of post-Covid-19 period," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    3. Iryna Sotnyk & Tetiana Kurbatova & Yaroslavna Romaniuk & Olha Prokopenko & Viktoriya Gonchar & Yuriy Sayenko & Gunnar Prause & Aleksander Sapiński, 2022. "Determining the Optimal Directions of Investment in Regional Renewable Energy Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-26, May.
    4. Alina Vysochyna & Natalia Stoyanets & Grzegorz Mentel & Tadeusz Olejarz, 2020. "Environmental Determinants of a Country’s Food Security in Short-Term and Long-Term Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, May.
    5. Carl-Friedrich Schleussner & Joeri Rogelj & Michiel Schaeffer & Tabea Lissner & Rachel Licker & Erich M. Fischer & Reto Knutti & Anders Levermann & Katja Frieler & William Hare, 2016. "Science and policy characteristics of the Paris Agreement temperature goal," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(9), pages 827-835, September.
    6. Radosław Miśkiewicz, 2020. "Efficiency of Electricity Production Technology from Post-Process Gas Heat: Ecological, Economic and Social Benefits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-15, November.
    7. Yahya, Farzan & Lee, Chien-Chiang, 2023. "Disentangling the asymmetric effect of financialization on the green output gap," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    8. Mariusz Dacko & Aleksandra Płonka & Łukasz Satoła & Aneta Dacko, 2021. "Sustainable Development According to the Opinions of Polish Experts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Sigit Perdana and Rod Tyers, 2020. "Global Climate Change Mitigation: Strategic Incentives," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3), pages 183-206.
    10. Valerii Havrysh & Antonina Kalinichenko & Grzegorz Mentel & Tadeusz Olejarz, 2020. "Commercial Biogas Plants: Lessons for Ukraine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, May.
    11. Jianzhuang Pang & Huilan Zhang, 2023. "Global map of a comprehensive drought/flood index and analysis of controlling environmental factors," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 116(1), pages 267-293, March.
    12. Timothy Osborn & Craig Wallace & Ian Harris & Thomas Melvin, 2016. "Pattern scaling using ClimGen: monthly-resolution future climate scenarios including changes in the variability of precipitation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 134(3), pages 353-369, February.
    13. Chien, FengSheng & Paramaiah, Ch & joseph, Robinson & Pham, Hong Chuong & Phan, Thi Thu Hien & Ngo, Thanh Quang, 2023. "The impact of eco-innovation, trade openness, financial development, green energy and government governance on sustainable development in ASEAN countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 259-268.
    14. Chien, Fengsheng & Hsu, Ching-Chi & Ozturk, Ilhan & Sharif, Arshian & Sadiq, Muhammad, 2022. "The role of renewable energy and urbanization towards greenhouse gas emission in top Asian countries: Evidence from advance panel estimations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 207-216.
    15. Armin Razmjoo & Meysam Majidi Nezhad & Lisa Gakenia Kaigutha & Mousa Marzband & Seyedali Mirjalili & Mehdi Pazhoohesh & Saim Memon & Mehdi A. Ehyaei & Giuseppe Piras, 2021. "Investigating Smart City Development Based on Green Buildings, Electrical Vehicles and Feasible Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-14, July.
    16. Tetyana Pimonenko & Yuriy Bilan & Jakub Horák & Liudmyla Starchenko & Waldemar Gajda, 2020. "Green Brand of Companies and Greenwashing under Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, February.
    17. Yurii Kharazishvili & Aleksy Kwilinski & Oleksandr Sukhodolia & Henryk Dzwigol & Dmytro Bobro & Janusz Kotowicz, 2021. "The Systemic Approach for Estimating and Strategizing Energy Security: The Case of Ukraine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-30, April.
    18. Luma Al-Qudah & Barbara Piontek & Judit Olah, 2021. "Economic Growth and Foreign Direct Investment in the Context of Financial Development: Evidence from Jordan," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 762-782.
    19. Pruethsan Sutthichaimethee & Chanintorn Jittawiriyanukoon, 2022. "The Impact of Causal Factors Relationship over the Changes in Future Scenario Management under the Sustainability Policy of Thailand," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(5), pages 36-46, September.
    20. Bartłomiej Bajan & Joanna Łukasiewicz & Aldona Mrówczyńska-Kamińska, 2021. "Energy Consumption and Its Structures in Food Production Systems of the Visegrad Group Countries Compared with EU-15 Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:4:p:807-:d:492615. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.