IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i4p802-d492520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Utilising Open Geospatial Data to Refine Weather Variables for Building Energy Performance Evaluation—Incident Solar Radiation and Wind-Driven Infiltration Modelling

Author

Listed:
  • Kristian Skeie

    (Department of Architecture and Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Alfred Getz vei 3, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Arild Gustavsen

    (Department of Architecture and Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Alfred Getz vei 3, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

Abstract

In building thermal energy characterisation, the relevance of proper modelling of the effects caused by solar radiation, temperature and wind is seen as a critical factor. Open geospatial datasets are growing in diversity, easing access to meteorological data and other relevant information that can be used for building energy modelling. However, the application of geospatial techniques combining multiple open datasets is not yet common in the often scripted workflows of data-driven building thermal performance characterisation. We present a method for processing time-series from climate reanalysis and satellite-derived solar irradiance services, by implementing land-use, and elevation raster maps served in an elevation profile web-service. The article describes a methodology to: (1) adapt gridded weather data to four case-building sites in Europe; (2) calculate the incident solar radiation on the building facades; (3) estimate wind and temperature-dependent infiltration using a single-zone infiltration model and (4) including separating and evaluating the sheltering effect of buildings and trees in the vicinity, based on building footprints. Calculations of solar radiation, surface wind and air infiltration potential are done using validated models published in the scientific literature. We found that using scripting tools to automate geoprocessing tasks is widespread, and implementing such techniques in conjunction with an elevation profile web service made it possible to utilise information from open geospatial data surrounding a building site effectively. We expect that the modelling approach could be further improved, including diffuse-shading methods and evaluating other wind shelter methods for urban settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristian Skeie & Arild Gustavsen, 2021. "Utilising Open Geospatial Data to Refine Weather Variables for Building Energy Performance Evaluation—Incident Solar Radiation and Wind-Driven Infiltration Modelling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-32, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:4:p:802-:d:492520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/4/802/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/4/802/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samuel Van Ackere & Greet Van Eetvelde & David Schillebeeckx & Enrica Papa & Karel Van Wyngene & Lieven Vandevelde, 2015. "Wind Resource Mapping Using Landscape Roughness and Spatial Interpolation Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Lukas Lundström & Jan Akander & Jesús Zambrano, 2019. "Development of a Space Heating Model Suitable for the Automated Model Generation of Existing Multifamily Buildings—A Case Study in Nordic Climate," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-27, February.
    3. Buffat, René & Grassi, Stefano & Raubal, Martin, 2018. "A scalable method for estimating rooftop solar irradiation potential over large regions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 389-401.
    4. Lingfors, D. & Bright, J.M. & Engerer, N.A. & Ahlberg, J. & Killinger, S. & Widén, J., 2017. "Comparing the capability of low- and high-resolution LiDAR data with application to solar resource assessment, roof type classification and shading analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1216-1230.
    5. Manfren, Massimiliano & Nastasi, Benedetto & Groppi, Daniele & Astiaso Garcia, Davide, 2020. "Open data and energy analytics - An analysis of essential information for energy system planning, design and operation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    6. Daniel Tabas & Jiannong Fang & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2019. "Wind Energy Prediction in Highly Complex Terrain by Computational Fluid Dynamics," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-12, April.
    7. Olauson, Jon, 2018. "ERA5: The new champion of wind power modelling?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 322-331.
    8. Miguel Centeno Brito & Paula Redweik & Cristina Catita & Sara Freitas & Miguel Santos, 2019. "3D Solar Potential in the Urban Environment: A Case Study in Lisbon," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-13, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Benedetto Nastasi & Massimiliano Manfren & Michel Noussan, 2021. "Open Data and Models for Energy and Environment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-2, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcela Bindzarova Gergelova & Slavomir Labant & Stefan Kuzevic & Zofia Kuzevicova & Henrieta Pavolova, 2020. "Identification of Roof Surfaces from LiDAR Cloud Points by GIS Tools: A Case Study of Lučenec, Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Sebastian Krapf & Nils Kemmerzell & Syed Khawaja Haseeb Uddin & Manuel Hack Vázquez & Fabian Netzler & Markus Lienkamp, 2021. "Towards Scalable Economic Photovoltaic Potential Analysis Using Aerial Images and Deep Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Benedetta Grassi & Edoardo Alessio Piana & Gian Paolo Beretta & Mariagrazia Pilotelli, 2020. "Dynamic Approach to Evaluate the Effect of Reducing District Heating Temperature on Indoor Thermal Comfort," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-25, December.
    4. Aslani, Mohammad & Seipel, Stefan, 2022. "Automatic identification of utilizable rooftop areas in digital surface models for photovoltaics potential assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PA).
    5. Massimiliano Manfren & Maurizio Sibilla & Lamberto Tronchin, 2021. "Energy Modelling and Analytics in the Built Environment—A Review of Their Role for Energy Transitions in the Construction Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-29, January.
    6. Manfren, Massimiliano & Nastasi, Benedetto & Tronchin, Lamberto & Groppi, Daniele & Garcia, Davide Astiaso, 2021. "Techno-economic analysis and energy modelling as a key enablers for smart energy services and technologies in buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    7. Gil Ruiz, Samuel Andrés & Barriga, Julio Eduardo Cañón & Martínez, J. Alejandro, 2021. "Wind power assessment in the Caribbean region of Colombia, using ten-minute wind observations and ERA5 data," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 158-176.
    8. Piotr Michalak, 2021. "Modelling of Solar Irradiance Incident on Building Envelopes in Polish Climatic Conditions: The Impact on Energy Performance Indicators of Residential Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-27, July.
    9. Arkaitz Rabanal & Alain Ulazia & Gabriel Ibarra-Berastegi & Jon Sáenz & Unai Elosegui, 2018. "MIDAS: A Benchmarking Multi-Criteria Method for the Identification of Defective Anemometers in Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Srihari Sundar & Michael T. Craig & Ashley E. Payne & David J. Brayshaw & Flavio Lehner, 2023. "Meteorological drivers of resource adequacy failures in current and high renewable Western U.S. power systems," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    11. Hayes, Liam & Stocks, Matthew & Blakers, Andrew, 2021. "Accurate long-term power generation model for offshore wind farms in Europe using ERA5 reanalysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    12. Shengli Liao & Xudong Tian & Benxi Liu & Tian Liu & Huaying Su & Binbin Zhou, 2022. "Short-Term Wind Power Prediction Based on LightGBM and Meteorological Reanalysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-21, August.
    13. Alain Ulazia & Ander Nafarrate & Gabriel Ibarra-Berastegi & Jon Sáenz & Sheila Carreno-Madinabeitia, 2019. "The Consequences of Air Density Variations over Northeastern Scotland for Offshore Wind Energy Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.
    14. Shih-Chieh Liao & Shih-Chieh Chang & Tsung-Chi Cheng, 2021. "Managing the Volatility Risk of Renewable Energy: Index Insurance for Offshore Wind Farms in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-27, August.
    15. Sweder Reuchlin & Rishikesh Joshi & Roland Schmehl, 2023. "Sizing of Hybrid Power Systems for Off-Grid Applications Using Airborne Wind Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-15, May.
    16. Francesco Castellani & Ravi Pandit & Francesco Natili & Francesca Belcastro & Davide Astolfi, 2023. "Advanced Methods for Wind Turbine Performance Analysis Based on SCADA Data and CFD Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-15, January.
    17. Italo Fernandes & Felipe M. Pimenta & Osvaldo R. Saavedra & Arcilan T. Assireu, 2022. "Exploring the Complementarity of Offshore Wind Sites to Reduce the Seasonal Variability of Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    18. Wiese, Frauke & Schlecht, Ingmar & Bunke, Wolf-Dieter & Gerbaulet, Clemens & Hirth, Lion & Jahn, Martin & Kunz, Friedrich & Lorenz, Casimir & Mühlenpfordt, Jonathan & Reimann, Juliane & Schill, Wolf-P, 2019. "Open Power System Data – Frictionless data for electricity system modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 401-409.
    19. Ulazia, Alain & Sáenz, Jon & Ibarra-Berastegi, Gabriel & González-Rojí, Santos J. & Carreno-Madinabeitia, Sheila, 2019. "Global estimations of wind energy potential considering seasonal air density changes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    20. Hettinga, Sanne & van ’t Veer, Rein & Boter, Jaap, 2023. "Large scale energy labelling with models: The EU TABULA model versus machine learning with open data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:4:p:802-:d:492520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.