IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i17p5520-d628832.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Possibility of Energetic Utilization of Biomass Obtained from Grass Mowing of a Large-Area Golf Course—A Case Study of Tuscany

Author

Listed:
  • Łukasz Sobol

    (Department of Applied Bioeconomy, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 51-630 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Arkadiusz Dyjakon

    (Department of Applied Bioeconomy, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 51-630 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Alessandro Suardi

    (Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e L’Analisi Dell’Economia Agraria (CREA), Centro di Ricerca Ingegneria e Trasformazioni Agroalimentari, Via Della Pascolare 16, 00015 Monterotondo, Rome, Italy)

  • Rainer Preißmann

    (Deutsche Golf Holding Ltd., Aktienstr. 177, D 45359 Essen, Germany)

Abstract

The mowing of sports fields generates a significant amount of waste biomass which requires appropriate management. On the largest scale, this problem affects golf courses with a grass surface area of up to 100 ha. Currently, the main directions for grass clippings management include composting, grass cycling, and waste. A certain alternative may be the energetic utilization of grass clippings, which not only solves the problem of organic waste management, but also brings measurable economic profits in the form of generated electricity and heat. This paper presents a techno-economic analysis of the application of a micro biogas plant, fed with grass clippings from a golf course project in Tuscany, with a grass surface of 111.21 ha. It has been shown that the annual biomass potential is 526.65 t DM ∙year −1 (±45.64 t DM ∙year −1 ), which makes it possible to build a micro biogas plant with an electric power of ca. 46 kW. The potential amount of electricity produced during the year is able to cover 16.95–37.35% (depending on the season) of electricity demand in the hotel resort, which includes two golf courses and practice facilities. The produced heat in the amount of 1388.41 GJ, in turn, is able to cover the annual heat demand in the range of 7.95–17.24% (depending on the season). In addition, the electricity and heat produced exceeds the energy expenditures for mowing, making the energy balance positive. Unfortunately, the analysis showed that the construction of a micro scale biogas plant is economically unprofitable and is characterized (in the period of 10 years) by negative IRR and ROI (−17.74% and −34.98%, respectively). However, it should be emphasized that with the additional income resulting from the avoidance of fees for the export and management of organic waste and the reduction of fertilization costs (fertilization of part of the golf course with digestate), the application of a micro biogas plant may turn out to be economically feasible (NPV > 0).

Suggested Citation

  • Łukasz Sobol & Arkadiusz Dyjakon & Alessandro Suardi & Rainer Preißmann, 2021. "Analysis of the Possibility of Energetic Utilization of Biomass Obtained from Grass Mowing of a Large-Area Golf Course—A Case Study of Tuscany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:17:p:5520-:d:628832
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/17/5520/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/17/5520/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adam Wąs & Piotr Sulewski & Vitaliy Krupin & Nazariy Popadynets & Agata Malak-Rawlikowska & Magdalena Szymańska & Iryna Skorokhod & Marcin Wysokiński, 2020. "The Potential of Agricultural Biogas Production in Ukraine—Impact on GHG Emissions and Energy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Sgroi, Filippo & Di Trapani, Anna Maria & Foderà, Mario & Testa, Riccardo & Tudisca, Salvatore, 2015. "Economic assessment of Eucalyptus (spp.) for biomass production as alternative crop in Southern Italy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 614-619.
    3. Michel Pirchio & Marco Fontanelli & Fabio Labanca & Mino Sportelli & Christian Frasconi & Luisa Martelloni & Michele Raffaelli & Andrea Peruzzi & Monica Gaetani & Simone Magni & Lisa Caturegli & Marco, 2019. "Energetic Aspects of Turfgrass Mowing: Comparison of Different Rotary Mowing Systems," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-6, August.
    4. Maurizio Carlini & Enrico Maria Mosconi & Sonia Castellucci & Mauro Villarini & Andrea Colantoni, 2017. "An Economical Evaluation of Anaerobic Digestion Plants Fed with Organic Agro-Industrial Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Przemysław Seruga, 2021. "The Municipal Solid Waste Management System with Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-9, April.
    6. Boumtje, Pierre I. & Florkowski, Wojciech J. & Landry, Gil W., Jr. & Escalante, Cesar L., 2004. "Factors Affecting The Profitability Of Golf Courses In Georgia," 2004 Annual Meeting, February 14-18, 2004, Tulsa, Oklahoma 34664, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    7. Gabriel Cucui & Constantin Aurelian Ionescu & Ioana Raluca Goldbach & Mihaela Denisa Coman & Elena Liliana Moiceanu Marin, 2018. "Quantifying the Economic Effects of Biogas Installations for Organic Waste from Agro-Industrial Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    8. Meike Nitsche & Frank Hensgen & Michael Wachendorf, 2017. "Using Grass Cuttings from Sports Fields for Anaerobic Digestion and Combustion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-11, March.
    9. Thamsiriroj, T. & Nizami, A.S. & Murphy, J.D., 2012. "Why does mono-digestion of grass silage fail in long term operation?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 64-76.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sergio Cappucci & Serena Nappi & Andrea Cappelli, 2022. "Green Public Areas and Urban Open Spaces Management: New GreenCAL Tool Algorithms and Circular Economy Implications," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-25, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Spyridon Achinas & Johan Horjus & Vasileios Achinas & Gerrit Jan Willem Euverink, 2019. "A PESTLE Analysis of Biofuels Energy Industry in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Hao Zhu & Xiaoning He & Shuqi Shang & Zhuang Zhao & Haiqing Wang & Ying Tan & Chengpeng Li & Dongwei Wang, 2022. "Evaluation of Soil-Cutting and Plant-Crushing Performance of Rotary Blades with Double-Eccentric Circular-Edge Curve for Harvesting Cyperus esculentus," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Bedoić, Robert & Dorotić, Hrvoje & Schneider, Daniel Rolph & Čuček, Lidija & Ćosić, Boris & Pukšec, Tomislav & Duić, Neven, 2021. "Synergy between feedstock gate fee and power-to-gas: An energy and economic analysis of renewable methane production in a biogas plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 12-23.
    4. Venkata Ravi Sankar Cheela & Michele John & Wahidul K. Biswas & Brajesh Dubey, 2021. "Environmental Impact Evaluation of Current Municipal Solid Waste Treatments in India Using Life Cycle Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, May.
    5. Moritz von Cossel & Andrea Bauerle & Meike Boob & Ulrich Thumm & Martin Elsaesser & Iris Lewandowski, 2019. "The Performance of Mesotrophic Arrhenatheretum Grassland under Different Cutting Frequency Regimes for Biomass Production in Southwest Germany," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Claudinei De Souza Guimarães & David Rodrigues da Silva Maia & Eduardo Gonçalves Serra, 2018. "Construction of Biodigesters to Optimize the Production of Biogas from Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Food Waste and Sewage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-10, April.
    7. Adam Wąs & Piotr Sulewski & Nataliia Gerasymchuk & Ludmila Stepasyuk & Vitaliy Krupin & Zoia Titenko & Kinga Pogodzińska, 2022. "The Potential of Ukrainian Agriculture’s Biomass to Generate Renewable Energy in the Context of Climate and Political Challenges—The Case of the Kyiv Region," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-16, September.
    8. Henrique Oliveira & Víctor Moutinho, 2021. "Renewable Energy, Economic Growth and Economic Development Nexus: A Bibliometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-28, July.
    9. Lübken, Manfred & Koch, Konrad & Gehring, Tito & Horn, Harald & Wichern, Marc, 2015. "Parameter estimation and long-term process simulation of a biogas reactor operated under trace elements limitation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 352-360.
    10. Ahmadi, Mohammad Mahdi & Keyhani, Alireza & Rosen, Marc A. & Lam, Su Shiung & Pan, Junting & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Aghbashlo, Mortaza, 2022. "Towards sustainable net-zero districts using the extended exergy accounting concept," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 747-764.
    11. Sara Rajabi Hamedani & Mauro Villarini & Andrea Colantoni & Maurizio Carlini & Massimo Cecchini & Francesco Santoro & Antonio Pantaleo, 2020. "Environmental and Economic Analysis of an Anaerobic Co-Digestion Power Plant Integrated with a Compost Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, May.
    12. Simone Magni & Mino Sportelli & Nicola Grossi & Marco Volterrani & Alberto Minelli & Michel Pirchio & Marco Fontanelli & Christian Frasconi & Monica Gaetani & Luisa Martelloni & Andrea Peruzzi & Miche, 2020. "Autonomous Mowing and Turf-Type Bermudagrass as Innovations for An Environment-Friendly Floor Management of a Vineyard in Coastal Tuscany," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-12, May.
    13. Dinko Đurđević & Saša Žiković & Paolo Blecich, 2022. "Sustainable Sewage Sludge Management Technologies Selection Based on Techno-Economic-Environmental Criteria: Case Study of Croatia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-23, May.
    14. Grażyna Kędzia & Barbara Ocicka & Aneta Pluta-Zaremba & Marta Raźniewska & Jolanta Turek & Beata Wieteska-Rosiak, 2022. "Social Innovations for Improving Compostable Packaging Waste Management in CE: A Multi-Solution Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-19, December.
    15. Nadia Palmieri & Alessandro Suardi & Francesco Latterini & Luigi Pari, 2020. "The Eucalyptus Firewood: Understanding Consumers’ Behaviour and Motivations," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, October.
    16. Van Meerbeek, Koenraad & Muys, Bart & Hermy, Martin, 2019. "Lignocellulosic biomass for bioenergy beyond intensive cropland and forests," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 139-149.
    17. Sahoo, Somadutta & van Stralen, Joost N.P. & Zuidema, Christian & Sijm, Jos & Yamu, Claudia & Faaij, André, 2022. "Regionalization of a national integrated energy system model: A case study of the northern Netherlands," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(PB).
    18. Ó Céileachair, Dónal & O'Shea, Richard & Murphy, Jerry D. & Wall, David M., 2021. "Alternative energy management strategies for large industry in non-gas-grid regions using on-farm biomethane," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    19. Giovanni Gadaleta & Sabino De Gisi & Michele Notarnicola, 2021. "Feasibility Analysis on the Adoption of Decentralized Anaerobic Co-Digestion for the Treatment of Municipal Organic Waste with Energy Recovery in Urban Districts of Metropolitan Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-17, February.
    20. Otton K. Roubinek & Anna Wilinska-Lisowska & Magdalena Jasinska & Andrzej G. Chmielewski & Krzysztof Czerwionka, 2023. "Production of Biogas from Distillation Residue as a Waste Material from the Distillery Industry in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-15, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:17:p:5520-:d:628832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.