IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i17p5449-d627177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Robust Optimization Approach for Optimal Power Flow Solutions Using Rao Algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Saket Gupta

    (Electrical Engineering Department, Delhi Technological University, Delhi 110042, India)

  • Narendra Kumar

    (Electrical Engineering Department, Delhi Technological University, Delhi 110042, India)

  • Laxmi Srivastava

    (Electrical Engineering Department, Madhav Institute of Technology & Science, Gwalior 474005, India)

  • Hasmat Malik

    (Berkeley Education Alliance for Research in Singapore (BEARS), University Town, NUS Campus, Singapore 138602, Singapore)

  • Amjad Anvari-Moghaddam

    (Department of Energy (AAU Energy), Aalborg University, 9220 Aalborg, Denmark)

  • Fausto Pedro García Márquez

    (Ingenium Research Group, Universidad Castilla-La Mancha, 13071 Ciudad Real, Spain)

Abstract

This paper offers three easy-to-use metaphor-less optimization algorithms proposed by Rao to solve the optimal power flow (OPF) problem. Rao algorithms are parameter-less optimization algorithms. As a result, algorithm-specific parameter tuning is not required at all. This quality makes these algorithms simple to use and able to solve various kinds of complex constrained optimization and engineering problems. In this paper, the main aim to solve the OPF problem is to find the optimal values of the control variables in a given electrical network for fuel cost minimization, real power losses minimization, emission cost minimization, voltage profile improvement, and voltage stability enhancement, while all the operating constraints are satisfied. To demonstrate the efficacy of Rao algorithms, these algorithms have been employed in three standard IEEE test systems (30-bus, 57-bus, and 118-bus) to solve the OPF problem. The OPF results of Rao algorithms and the results provided by other swarm intelligence (SI)/evolutionary computing (EC)-based algorithms published in recent literature have been compared. Based on the outcomes, Rao algorithms are found to be robust and superior to their competitors.

Suggested Citation

  • Saket Gupta & Narendra Kumar & Laxmi Srivastava & Hasmat Malik & Amjad Anvari-Moghaddam & Fausto Pedro García Márquez, 2021. "A Robust Optimization Approach for Optimal Power Flow Solutions Using Rao Algorithms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-28, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:17:p:5449-:d:627177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/17/5449/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/17/5449/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Warid Warid & Hashim Hizam & Norman Mariun & Noor Izzri Abdul-Wahab, 2016. "Optimal Power Flow Using the Jaya Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Niknam, Taher & Narimani, Mohammad rasoul & Jabbari, Masoud & Malekpour, Ahmad Reza, 2011. "A modified shuffle frog leaping algorithm for multi-objective optimal power flow," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 6420-6432.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammed Hamouda Ali & Ali M. El-Rifaie & Ahmed A. F. Youssef & Vladimir N. Tulsky & Mohamed A. Tolba, 2023. "Techno-Economic Strategy for the Load Dispatch and Power Flow in Power Grids Using Peafowl Optimization Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-29, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ali S. Alghamdi, 2022. "Optimal Power Flow in Wind–Photovoltaic Energy Regulation Systems Using a Modified Turbulent Water Flow-Based Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-27, December.
    2. Thanh Long Duong & Ngoc Anh Nguyen & Thuan Thanh Nguyen, 2020. "A Newly Hybrid Method Based on Cuckoo Search and Sunflower Optimization for Optimal Power Flow Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Gonggui Chen & Xingting Yi & Zhizhong Zhang & Hangtian Lei, 2018. "Solving the Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Problem Using the Multi-Objective Firefly Algorithm with a Constraints-Prior Pareto-Domination Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Murtadha Al-Kaabi & Virgil Dumbrava & Mircea Eremia, 2022. "Single and Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Based on Hunger Games Search with Pareto Concept Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-31, November.
    5. Abdullah Khan & Hashim Hizam & Noor Izzri Abdul-Wahab & Mohammad Lutfi Othman, 2020. "Solution of Optimal Power Flow Using Non-Dominated Sorting Multi Objective Based Hybrid Firefly and Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-24, August.
    6. Hao Su & Qun Niu & Zhile Yang, 2023. "Optimal Power Flow Using Improved Cross-Entropy Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-33, July.
    7. Gonggui Chen & Zhengmei Lu & Zhizhong Zhang, 2018. "Improved Krill Herd Algorithm with Novel Constraint Handling Method for Solving Optimal Power Flow Problems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-27, January.
    8. Usama Khaled & Ali M. Eltamaly & Abderrahmane Beroual, 2017. "Optimal Power Flow Using Particle Swarm Optimization of Renewable Hybrid Distributed Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, July.
    9. Niknam, Taher & Azizipanah-Abarghooee, Rasoul & Narimani, Mohammad Rasoul, 2012. "Reserve constrained dynamic optimal power flow subject to valve-point effects, prohibited zones and multi-fuel constraints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 451-464.
    10. Amr Khaled Khamees & Almoataz Y. Abdelaziz & Makram R. Eskaros & Mahmoud A. Attia & Mariam A. Sameh, 2022. "Optimal Power Flow with Stochastic Renewable Energy Using Three Mixture Component Distribution Functions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.
    11. Shabanpour-Haghighi, Amin & Seifi, Ali Reza, 2015. "Multi-objective operation management of a multi-carrier energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 430-442.
    12. Murtadha Al-Kaabi & Virgil Dumbrava & Mircea Eremia, 2022. "A Slime Mould Algorithm Programming for Solving Single and Multi-Objective Optimal Power Flow Problems with Pareto Front Approach: A Case Study of the Iraqi Super Grid High Voltage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-33, October.
    13. Elattar, Ehab E., 2019. "Environmental economic dispatch with heat optimization in the presence of renewable energy based on modified shuffle frog leaping algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 256-269.
    14. Fitiwi, Desta Z. & Olmos, L. & Rivier, M. & de Cuadra, F. & Pérez-Arriaga, I.J., 2016. "Finding a representative network losses model for large-scale transmission expansion planning with renewable energy sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 343-358.
    15. Elattar, Ehab E. & ElSayed, Salah K., 2019. "Modified JAYA algorithm for optimal power flow incorporating renewable energy sources considering the cost, emission, power loss and voltage profile improvement," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 598-609.
    16. Mohammed Hamouda Ali & Ali M. El-Rifaie & Ahmed A. F. Youssef & Vladimir N. Tulsky & Mohamed A. Tolba, 2023. "Techno-Economic Strategy for the Load Dispatch and Power Flow in Power Grids Using Peafowl Optimization Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-29, January.
    17. Ghasemi, Mojtaba & Ghavidel, Sahand & Ghanbarian, Mohammad Mehdi & Gharibzadeh, Masihallah & Azizi Vahed, Ali, 2014. "Multi-objective optimal power flow considering the cost, emission, voltage deviation and power losses using multi-objective modified imperialist competitive algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 276-289.
    18. Li, Shuijia & Gong, Wenyin & Wang, Ling & Yan, Xuesong & Hu, Chengyu, 2020. "Optimal power flow by means of improved adaptive differential evolution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    19. Özyön, Serdar & Temurtaş, Hasan & Durmuş, Burhanettin & Kuvat, Gültekin, 2012. "Charged system search algorithm for emission constrained economic power dispatch problem," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 420-430.
    20. Gracita Batista Rosas & Elizete Maria Lourenço & Djalma Mosqueira Falcão & Thelma Solange Piazza Fernandes, 2019. "An Expeditious Methodology to Assess the Effects of Intermittent Generation on Power Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:17:p:5449-:d:627177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.