IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i17p5239-d620870.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermodynamic Modeling of Mutual Solubilities in Gas-Laden Brines Systems Containing CO 2 , CH 4 , N 2 , O 2 , H 2 , H 2 O, NaCl, CaCl 2 , and KCl: Application to Degassing in Geothermal Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Salaheddine Chabab

    (Laboratoire de Thermique, Energetique et Procédés (LaTEP), University of Pau and Pays de l’Adour, Rue Jules Ferry BP 7511, CEDEX, 64075 Pau, France)

  • José Lara Cruz

    (Laboratoire de Thermique, Energetique et Procédés (LaTEP), University of Pau and Pays de l’Adour, Rue Jules Ferry BP 7511, CEDEX, 64075 Pau, France)

  • Marie Poulain

    (Laboratoire de Thermique, Energetique et Procédés (LaTEP), University of Pau and Pays de l’Adour, Rue Jules Ferry BP 7511, CEDEX, 64075 Pau, France)

  • Marion Ducousso

    (Laboratoire de Thermique, Energetique et Procédés (LaTEP), University of Pau and Pays de l’Adour, Rue Jules Ferry BP 7511, CEDEX, 64075 Pau, France)

  • François Contamine

    (Laboratoire de Thermique, Energetique et Procédés (LaTEP), University of Pau and Pays de l’Adour, Rue Jules Ferry BP 7511, CEDEX, 64075 Pau, France)

  • Jean Paul Serin

    (Laboratoire de Thermique, Energetique et Procédés (LaTEP), University of Pau and Pays de l’Adour, Rue Jules Ferry BP 7511, CEDEX, 64075 Pau, France)

  • Pierre Cézac

    (Laboratoire de Thermique, Energetique et Procédés (LaTEP), University of Pau and Pays de l’Adour, Rue Jules Ferry BP 7511, CEDEX, 64075 Pau, France)

Abstract

With the growing interest in geothermal energy as a renewable and sustainable energy source, nowadays engineers and researchers are facing technological and environmental challenges during geothermal wells’ operation or energy recovery improvement by optimizing surface installations. One of the major problems encountered is the degassing of geothermal brines which are often loaded with dissolved gases, resulting in technical problems (scale formation, corrosion, reduced process efficiency, etc.) and environmental problems through the possible emission of greenhouse gases (CO 2 , CH 4 and water vapor) into the atmosphere. In this work, a method to predict, from readily available information such as temperature and GLR, the bubble point pressure of geothermal fluids as well as the GHG emission rate depending on the surface conditions is presented. This method is based on an extended version of the Soreide and Whitson model with new parameters optimized on the solubility data of several gases (CO 2 , CH 4 , N 2 , O 2 and H 2 ) in brine (NaCl + CaCl 2 + KCl). The developed approach has been successfully used for the prediction of water content of different gases and their solubilities in different types of brines over a wide temperature and pressure range, and has been applied for the prediction of bubble point pressure and GHG emissions by comparing the results with available industrial data of geothermal power plants including the Upper Rhine Graben sites.

Suggested Citation

  • Salaheddine Chabab & José Lara Cruz & Marie Poulain & Marion Ducousso & François Contamine & Jean Paul Serin & Pierre Cézac, 2021. "Thermodynamic Modeling of Mutual Solubilities in Gas-Laden Brines Systems Containing CO 2 , CH 4 , N 2 , O 2 , H 2 , H 2 O, NaCl, CaCl 2 , and KCl: Application to Degassing in Geothermal Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-22, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:17:p:5239-:d:620870
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/17/5239/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/17/5239/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lu, Shyi-Min, 2018. "A global review of enhanced geothermal system (EGS)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2902-2921.
    2. Aksoy, Niyazi, 2014. "Power generation from geothermal resources in Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 595-601.
    3. Haehnlein, Stefanie & Bayer, Peter & Blum, Philipp, 2010. "International legal status of the use of shallow geothermal energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 2611-2625, December.
    4. Pan, Shu-Yuan & Gao, Mengyao & Shah, Kinjal J. & Zheng, Jianming & Pei, Si-Lu & Chiang, Pen-Chi, 2019. "Establishment of enhanced geothermal energy utilization plans: Barriers and strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 19-32.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anderson, Austin & Rezaie, Behnaz, 2019. "Geothermal technology: Trends and potential role in a sustainable future," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 18-34.
    2. Tsagarakis, Konstantinos P. & Efthymiou, Loukia & Michopoulos, Apostolos & Mavragani, Amaryllis & Anđelković, Aleksandar S. & Antolini, Francesco & Bacic, Mario & Bajare, Diana & Baralis, Matteo & Bog, 2020. "A review of the legal framework in shallow geothermal energy in selected European countries: Need for guidelines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P2), pages 2556-2571.
    3. Soltani, M. & Moradi Kashkooli, Farshad & Souri, Mohammad & Rafiei, Behnam & Jabarifar, Mohammad & Gharali, Kobra & Nathwani, Jatin S., 2021. "Environmental, economic, and social impacts of geothermal energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    4. Ma, Yuanyuan & Li, Shibin & Zhang, Ligang & Liu, Songze & Liu, Zhaoyi & Li, Hao & Shi, Erxiu, 2020. "Study on the effect of well layout schemes and fracture parameters on the heat extraction performance of enhanced geothermal system in fractured reservoir," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    5. Chen, Heng & Wang, Yihan & Li, Jiarui & Xu, Gang & Lei, Jing & Liu, Tong, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis and economic assessment of an improved geothermal power system integrated with a biomass-fired cogeneration plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    6. Ma, Yuanyuan & Li, Shibin & Zhang, Ligang & Liu, Songze & Liu, Zhaoyi & Li, Hao & Shi, Erxiu & Zhang, Haijun, 2020. "Numerical simulation study on the heat extraction performance of multi-well injection enhanced geothermal system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 782-795.
    7. Malek, Adam E. & Adams, Benjamin M. & Rossi, Edoardo & Schiegg, Hans O. & Saar, Martin O., 2022. "Techno-economic analysis of Advanced Geothermal Systems (AGS)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 927-943.
    8. Ren, Yaqian & Kong, Yanlong & Pang, Zhonghe & Wang, Jiyang, 2023. "A comprehensive review of tracer tests in enhanced geothermal systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    9. Cassina, Lisa & Laloui, Lyesse & Rotta Loria, Alessandro F., 2022. "Thermal interactions among vertical geothermal borehole fields," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 1204-1220.
    10. Rivera, Jaime A. & Blum, Philipp & Bayer, Peter, 2015. "Ground energy balance for borehole heat exchangers: Vertical fluxes, groundwater and storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1341-1351.
    11. Tomasz Sliwa & Aneta Sapińska-Śliwa & Andrzej Gonet & Tomasz Kowalski & Anna Sojczyńska, 2021. "Geothermal Boreholes in Poland—Overview of the Current State of Knowledge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, June.
    12. Zheng, Bobo & Xu, Jiuping & Ni, Ting & Li, Meihui, 2015. "Geothermal energy utilization trends from a technological paradigm perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 430-441.
    13. Sommer, Wijbrand & Valstar, Johan & Leusbrock, Ingo & Grotenhuis, Tim & Rijnaarts, Huub, 2015. "Optimization and spatial pattern of large-scale aquifer thermal energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 322-337.
    14. Jizhe Guo & Zengchao Feng & Xuecheng Li, 2023. "Shear Strength and Energy Evolution of Granite under Real-Time Temperature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    15. Wentao Zhao & Yilong Yuan & Tieya Jing & Chenghao Zhong & Shoucheng Wei & Yulong Yin & Deyuan Zhao & Haowei Yuan & Jin Zheng & Shaomin Wang, 2023. "Heat Production Performance from an Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) Using CO 2 as the Working Fluid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-16, October.
    16. Wang, Gaosheng & Song, Xianzhi & Shi, Yu & Yang, Ruiyue & Yulong, Feixue & Zheng, Rui & Li, Jiacheng, 2021. "Heat extraction analysis of a novel multilateral-well coaxial closed-loop geothermal system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 974-986.
    17. Hu, Xincheng & Banks, Jonathan & Guo, Yunting & Liu, Wei Victor, 2022. "Utilizing geothermal energy from enhanced geothermal systems as a heat source for oil sands separation: A numerical evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    18. Linkai Li & Xiao Guo & Ming Zhou & Gang Xiang & Ning Zhang & Yue Wang & Shengyuan Wang & Arnold Landjobo Pagou, 2021. "The Investigation of Fracture Networks on Heat Extraction Performance for an Enhanced Geothermal System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    19. Zhang, Bo & Guo, Tiankui & Qu, Zhanqing & Wang, Jiwei & Chen, Ming & Liu, Xiaoqiang, 2023. "Numerical simulation of fracture propagation and production performance in a fractured geothermal reservoir using a 2D FEM-based THMD coupling model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    20. Trumpy, Eugenio & Bertani, Ruggero & Manzella, Adele & Sander, Marietta, 2015. "The web-oriented framework of the world geothermal production database: A business intelligence platform for wide data distribution and analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 379-389.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:17:p:5239-:d:620870. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.