IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i12p3625-d577210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying the Effects of Wave—Current Interactions on Tidal Energy Resource at Sites in the English Channel Using Coupled Numerical Simulations

Author

Listed:
  • Jon Hardwick

    (Renewable Energy Group, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn TR10 9FE, UK
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Ed B. L. Mackay

    (Renewable Energy Group, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn TR10 9FE, UK
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Ian G. C. Ashton

    (Renewable Energy Group, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn TR10 9FE, UK)

  • Helen C. M. Smith

    (Renewable Energy Group, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn TR10 9FE, UK)

  • Philipp R. Thies

    (Renewable Energy Group, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn TR10 9FE, UK)

Abstract

Numerical modeling of currents and waves is used throughout the marine energy industry for resource assessment. This study compared the output of numerical flow simulations run both as a standalone model and as a two-way coupled wave–current simulation. A regional coupled flow-wave model was established covering the English Channel using the Delft D-Flow 2D model coupled with a SWAN spectral wave model. Outputs were analyzed at three tidal energy sites: Alderney Race, Big Roussel (Guernsey), and PTEC (Isle of Wight). The difference in the power in the tidal flow between coupled and standalone model runs was strongly correlated to the relative direction of the waves and currents. The net difference between the coupled and standalone runs was less than 2.5%. However, when wave and current directions were aligned, the mean flow power was increased by up to 7%, whereas, when the directions were opposed, the mean flow power was reduced by as much as 9.6%. The D-Flow Flexible Mesh model incorporates the effects of waves into the flow calculations in three areas: Stokes drift, forcing by radiation stress gradients, and enhancement of the bed shear stress. Each of these mechanisms is discussed. Forcing from radiation stress gradients is shown to be the dominant mechanism affecting the flow conditions at the sites considered, primarily caused by dissipation of wave energy due to white-capping. Wave action is an important consideration at tidal energy sites. Although the net impact on the flow power was found to be small for the present sites, the effect is site specific and may be significant at sites with large wave exposure or strong asymmetry in the flow conditions and should thus be considered for detailed resource and engineering assessments.

Suggested Citation

  • Jon Hardwick & Ed B. L. Mackay & Ian G. C. Ashton & Helen C. M. Smith & Philipp R. Thies, 2021. "Quantifying the Effects of Wave—Current Interactions on Tidal Energy Resource at Sites in the English Channel Using Coupled Numerical Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:12:p:3625-:d:577210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3625/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/12/3625/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bahaj, A.S. & Myers, L., 2004. "Analytical estimates of the energy yield potential from the Alderney Race (Channel Islands) using marine current energy converters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(12), pages 1931-1945.
    2. Draper, Scott & Adcock, Thomas A.A. & Borthwick, Alistair G.L. & Houlsby, Guy T., 2014. "Estimate of the tidal stream power resource of the Pentland Firth," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 650-657.
    3. Coles, D.S. & Blunden, L.S. & Bahaj, A.S., 2017. "Assessment of the energy extraction potential at tidal sites around the Channel Islands," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 171-186.
    4. Lewis, M.J. & Neill, S.P. & Hashemi, M.R. & Reza, M., 2014. "Realistic wave conditions and their influence on quantifying the tidal stream energy resource," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 495-508.
    5. Blunden, L.S. & Bahaj, A.S., 2006. "Initial evaluation of tidal stream energy resources at Portland Bill, UK," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 121-132.
    6. Hashemi, M. Reza & Neill, Simon P. & Robins, Peter E. & Davies, Alan G. & Lewis, Matt J., 2015. "Effect of waves on the tidal energy resource at a planned tidal stream array," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 626-639.
    7. van Nieuwkoop, Joana C.C. & Smith, Helen C.M. & Smith, George H. & Johanning, Lars, 2013. "Wave resource assessment along the Cornish coast (UK) from a 23-year hindcast dataset validated against buoy measurements," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1-14.
    8. Fairley, Iain & Evans, Paul & Wooldridge, Chris & Willis, Miles & Masters, Ian, 2013. "Evaluation of tidal stream resource in a potential array area via direct measurements," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 70-78.
    9. Lewis, M. & Neill, S.P. & Robins, P.E. & Hashemi, M.R., 2015. "Resource assessment for future generations of tidal-stream energy arrays," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 403-415.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hannah Mullings & Samuel Draycott & Jérôme Thiébot & Sylvain Guillou & Philippe Mercier & Jon Hardwick & Ed Mackay & Philipp Thies & Tim Stallard, 2023. "Evaluation of Model Predictions of the Unsteady Tidal Stream Resource and Turbine Fatigue Loads Relative to Multi-Point Flow Measurements at Raz Blanchard," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-30, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thiébaut, Maxime & Sentchev, Alexei & du Bois, Pascal Bailly, 2019. "Merging velocity measurements and modeling to improve understanding of tidal stream resource in Alderney Race," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 460-470.
    2. Ian Masters & Alison Williams & T. Nick Croft & Michael Togneri & Matt Edmunds & Enayatollah Zangiabadi & Iain Fairley & Harshinie Karunarathna, 2015. "A Comparison of Numerical Modelling Techniques for Tidal Stream Turbine Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Van Thinh Nguyen & Alina Santa Cruz & Sylvain S. Guillou & Mohamad N. Shiekh Elsouk & Jérôme Thiébot, 2019. "Effects of the Current Direction on the Energy Production of a Tidal Farm: The Case of Raz Blanchard (France)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Pérez-Ortiz, Alberto & Borthwick, Alistair G.L. & McNaughton, James & Avdis, Alexandros, 2017. "Characterization of the tidal resource in Rathlin Sound," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PA), pages 229-243.
    5. Goh, Hooi-Bein & Lai, Sai-Hin & Jameel, Mohammed & Teh, Hee-Min, 2020. "Potential of coastal headlands for tidal energy extraction and the resulting environmental effects along Negeri Sembilan coastlines: A numerical simulation study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    6. Roche, R.C. & Walker-Springett, K. & Robins, P.E. & Jones, J. & Veneruso, G. & Whitton, T.A. & Piano, M. & Ward, S.L. & Duce, C.E. & Waggitt, J.J. & Walker-Springett, G.R. & Neill, S.P. & Lewis, M.J. , 2016. "Research priorities for assessing potential impacts of emerging marine renewable energy technologies: Insights from developments in Wales (UK)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1327-1341.
    7. Draycott, S. & Sellar, B. & Davey, T. & Noble, D.R. & Venugopal, V. & Ingram, D.M., 2019. "Capture and simulation of the ocean environment for offshore renewable energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 15-29.
    8. Fairley, Iain & Williamson, Benjamin J. & McIlvenny, Jason & King, Nicholas & Masters, Ian & Lewis, Matthew & Neill, Simon & Glasby, David & Coles, Daniel & Powell, Ben & Naylor, Keith & Robinson, Max, 2022. "Drone-based large-scale particle image velocimetry applied to tidal stream energy resource assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 839-855.
    9. Fairley, I. & Smith, H.C.M. & Robertson, B. & Abusara, M. & Masters, I., 2017. "Spatio-temporal variation in wave power and implications for electricity supply," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PA), pages 154-165.
    10. Neill, Simon P. & Vögler, Arne & Goward-Brown, Alice J. & Baston, Susana & Lewis, Matthew J. & Gillibrand, Philip A. & Waldman, Simon & Woolf, David K., 2017. "The wave and tidal resource of Scotland," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PA), pages 3-17.
    11. Frost, Carwyn H. & Evans, Paul S. & Harrold, Magnus J. & Mason-Jones, Allan & O'Doherty, Tim & O'Doherty, Daphne M., 2017. "The impact of axial flow misalignment on a tidal turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1333-1344.
    12. Nicolas Guillou & Georges Chapalain, 2017. "Tidal Turbines’ Layout in a Stream with Asymmetry and Misalignment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
    13. Lewis, M. & Neill, S.P. & Robins, P.E. & Hashemi, M.R., 2015. "Resource assessment for future generations of tidal-stream energy arrays," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 403-415.
    14. Robins, Peter E. & Neill, Simon P. & Lewis, Matt J. & Ward, Sophie L., 2015. "Characterising the spatial and temporal variability of the tidal-stream energy resource over the northwest European shelf seas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 510-522.
    15. Lewis, M. & Neill, S.P. & Robins, P. & Hashemi, M.R. & Ward, S., 2017. "Characteristics of the velocity profile at tidal-stream energy sites," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PA), pages 258-272.
    16. Piano, M. & Neill, S.P. & Lewis, M.J. & Robins, P.E. & Hashemi, M.R. & Davies, A.G. & Ward, S.L. & Roberts, M.J., 2017. "Tidal stream resource assessment uncertainty due to flow asymmetry and turbine yaw misalignment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 1363-1375.
    17. Guillou, Nicolas & Neill, Simon P. & Robins, Peter E., 2018. "Characterising the tidal stream power resource around France using a high-resolution harmonic database," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 706-718.
    18. Goward Brown, Alice J. & Neill, Simon P. & Lewis, Matthew J., 2017. "Tidal energy extraction in three-dimensional ocean models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PA), pages 244-257.
    19. Haverson, David & Bacon, John & Smith, Helen C.M. & Venugopal, Vengatesan & Xiao, Qing, 2018. "Modelling the hydrodynamic and morphological impacts of a tidal stream development in Ramsey Sound," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 876-887.
    20. Thiébaut, Maxime & Sentchev, Alexei, 2017. "Asymmetry of tidal currents off the W.Brittany coast and assessment of tidal energy resource around the Ushant Island," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 735-747.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:12:p:3625-:d:577210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.