IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2020i1p151-d470490.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychrophilic Full Scale Tubular Digester Operating over Eight Years: Complete Performance Evaluation and Microbiological Population

Author

Listed:
  • Jaime Jaimes-Estévez

    (Centro de Estudios en Investigaciones Ambientales (CEIAM) Research Group, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia)

  • German Zafra

    (Grupo de Investigación en Bioquímica y Microbiología (GIBIM), Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia)

  • Jaime Martí-Herrero

    (Biomass to Resources Group, Universidad Regional Amazonica Ikiam, Via Tena-Muyuna, Km.7, Tena, Napo, Ecuador
    Building Energy and Environment Group, Centre Internacional de Mètodes Numérics en Enginyeria (CIMNE), Terrassa, 08034 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Guillermo Pelaz

    (Chemical, Environmental and Bioprocess Engineering Group, Universidad de León, Av. Portugal 41, 24009 León, Spain)

  • Antonio Morán

    (Chemical, Environmental and Bioprocess Engineering Group, Universidad de León, Av. Portugal 41, 24009 León, Spain)

  • Alejandra Puentes

    (Centro de Estudios en Investigaciones Ambientales (CEIAM) Research Group, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia)

  • Christian Gomez

    (Centro de Estudios en Investigaciones Ambientales (CEIAM) Research Group, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia)

  • Liliana del Pilar Castro

    (Centro de Estudios en Investigaciones Ambientales (CEIAM) Research Group, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia)

  • Humberto Escalante Hernández

    (Centro de Estudios en Investigaciones Ambientales (CEIAM) Research Group, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia)

Abstract

Most biogas plants in the world run under psychrophilic conditions and are operated by small and medium farmers. There is a gap of knowledge on the performance of these systems after several years of operation. The aim of this research is to provide a complete evaluation of a psychrophilic, low-cost, tubular digester operated for eight years. The thermal performance was monitored for 50 days, and parameters such as pH, total volatile fatty acid (tVFA), chemical oxygen demand (COD) and volatile solids (VS) were measured every week for the influent and effluent. The digester operated at a stabilized slurry temperature of around 17.7 °C, with a mean organic load rate (OLR) equal to 0.52 kg VS/m 3 digester *d and an estimated hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 25 days. The VS reduction in the digester was around 77.58% and the COD reduction was 67 ± 3%, with a mean value for the effluent of 3.31 ± 1.20 g COD/Lt, while the tVFA decreased by 83.6 ± 15.5% and the presence of coliforms decreased 10.5%. A BioMethane potential test (BMP) for the influent and effluent showed that the digester reached a specific methane production of 0.40 Nm 3 CH 4 /kg VS and a 0.21 Nm 3 CH 4 /m 3 digester d with 63.1% CH 4 in the biogas. These results, together with a microbiological analysis, show stabilized anaerobic digestion and a biogas production that was higher than expected for the psychrophilic range and the short HRT; this may have been due to the presence of an anaerobic digestion microorganism consortium which was extremely well-adapted to psychrophilic conditions over the eight-year study period.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaime Jaimes-Estévez & German Zafra & Jaime Martí-Herrero & Guillermo Pelaz & Antonio Morán & Alejandra Puentes & Christian Gomez & Liliana del Pilar Castro & Humberto Escalante Hernández, 2020. "Psychrophilic Full Scale Tubular Digester Operating over Eight Years: Complete Performance Evaluation and Microbiological Population," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:151-:d:470490
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/1/151/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/1/151/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Massé, Daniel I. & Rajagopal, Rajinikanth & Singh, Gursharan, 2014. "Technical and operational feasibility of psychrophilic anaerobic digestion biotechnology for processing ammonia-rich waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 49-55.
    2. Martí-Herrero, J. & Soria-Castellón, G. & Diaz-de-Basurto, A. & Alvarez, R. & Chemisana, D., 2019. "Biogas from a full scale digester operated in psychrophilic conditions and fed only with fruit and vegetable waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 676-684.
    3. Garfí, Marianna & Martí-Herrero, Jaime & Garwood, Anna & Ferrer, Ivet, 2016. "Household anaerobic digesters for biogas production in Latin America: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 599-614.
    4. Dev, Subhabrata & Saha, Shouvik & Kurade, Mayur B. & Salama, El-Sayed & El-Dalatony, Marwa M. & Ha, Geon-Soo & Chang, Soon Woong & Jeon, Byong-Hun, 2019. "Perspective on anaerobic digestion for biomethanation in cold environments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 85-95.
    5. Martí-Herrero, Jaime & Chipana, Maria & Cuevas, Carlos & Paco, Gabriel & Serrano, Victor & Zymla, Bernhard & Heising, Klas & Sologuren, Jaime & Gamarra, Alba, 2014. "Low cost tubular digesters as appropriate technology for widespread application: Results and lessons learned from Bolivia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 156-165.
    6. Yao, Yao & Huang, Gordon & An, Chunjiang & Chen, Xiujuan & Zhang, Peng & Xin, Xiaying & Jian Shen, & Agnew, Joy, 2020. "Anaerobic digestion of livestock manure in cold regions: Technological advancements and global impacts," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Akindolire, Muyiwa Ajoke & Rama, Haripriya & Roopnarain, Ashira, 2022. "Psychrophilic anaerobic digestion: A critical evaluation of microorganisms and enzymes to drive the process," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    2. Tavera-Ruiz, C. & Martí-Herrero, J. & Mendieta, O. & Jaimes-Estévez, J. & Gauthier-Maradei, P. & Azimov, U. & Escalante, H. & Castro, L., 2023. "Current understanding and perspectives on anaerobic digestion in developing countries: Colombia case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    3. Juanpera, M. & Ferrer-Martí, L. & Diez-Montero, R. & Ferrer, I. & Castro, L. & Escalante, H. & Garfí, M., 2022. "A robust multicriteria analysis for the post-treatment of digestate from low-tech digesters. Boosting the circular bioeconomy of small-scale farms in Colombia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    4. Yao, Yao & Huang, Gordon & An, Chunjiang & Chen, Xiujuan & Zhang, Peng & Xin, Xiaying & Jian Shen, & Agnew, Joy, 2020. "Anaerobic digestion of livestock manure in cold regions: Technological advancements and global impacts," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    5. Noori M. Cata Saady & Daniel I. Massé, 2015. "Impact of Organic Loading Rate on Psychrophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Solid Dairy Manure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Ferraz de Campos, Victor Arruda & Silva, Valter Bruno & Cardoso, João Sousa & Brito, Paulo S. & Tuna, Celso Eduardo & Silveira, José Luz, 2021. "A review of waste management in Brazil and Portugal: Waste-to-energy as pathway for sustainable development," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 802-820.
    7. Martí-Herrero, J. & Soria-Castellón, G. & Diaz-de-Basurto, A. & Alvarez, R. & Chemisana, D., 2019. "Biogas from a full scale digester operated in psychrophilic conditions and fed only with fruit and vegetable waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 676-684.
    8. Yasar, Abdullah & Nazir, Saba & Rasheed, Rizwan & Tabinda, Amtul Bari & Nazar, Masooma, 2017. "Economic review of different designs of biogas plants at household level in Pakistan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 221-229.
    9. Basak, Bikram & Kumar, Ramesh & Tanpure, Rahul S. & Mishra, Amrita & Tripathy, Suraj K. & Chakrabortty, Sankha & Roh, Hyun-Seog & Yadav, Krishna Kumar & Chung, Woojin & Jeon, Byong-Hun, 2025. "Roles of engineered lignocellulolytic microbiota in bioaugmenting lignocellulose biomethanation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    10. Ferrer-Martí, Laia & Ferrer, Ivet & Sánchez, Elena & Garfí, Marianna, 2018. "A multi-criteria decision support tool for the assessment of household biogas digester programmes in rural areas. A case study in Peru," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 74-83.
    11. Choudhary, Ankur & Kumar, Ashish & Kumar, Sudhir, 2020. "Techno-economic analysis, kinetics, global warming potential comparison and optimization of a pilot-scale unheated semi-continuous anaerobic reactor in a hilly area: For north Indian hilly states," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1181-1190.
    12. Gaballah, Eid S. & Abdelkader, Tarek Kh & Luo, Shuai & Yuan, Qiaoxia & El-Fatah Abomohra, Abd, 2020. "Enhancement of biogas production by integrated solar heating system: A pilot study using tubular digester," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    13. Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Ferreira, Jorge A. & Sirohi, Ranjna & Sarsaiya, Surendra & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Baladi, Samin & Sindhu, Raveendran & Binod, Parameswaran & Pandey, Ashok & Juneja, Ankita & , 2021. "A critical review on the development stage of biorefinery systems towards the management of apple processing-derived waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    14. Yin, Dongxue & Liu, Wei & Zhai, Ningning & Wang, Yandong & Ren, Chengjie & Yang, Gaihe, 2017. "Regional differentiation of rural household biogas development and related driving factors in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1008-1018.
    15. Hollas, C.E. & Bolsan, A.C. & Chini, A. & Venturin, B. & Bonassa, G. & Cândido, D. & Antes, F.G. & Steinmetz, R.L.R. & Prado, N.V. & Kunz, A., 2021. "Effects of swine manure storage time on solid-liquid separation and biogas production: A life-cycle assessment approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    16. Fabiana Passos & Thiago Bressani-Ribeiro & Sonaly Rezende & Carlos A. L. Chernicharo, 2020. "Potential Applications of Biogas Produced in Small-Scale UASB-Based Sewage Treatment Plants in Brazil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-12, July.
    17. Chunjiang An & Mengfan Cai & Christophe Guy, 2020. "Rural Sustainable Environmental Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-5, August.
    18. Dev, Subhabrata & Saha, Shouvik & Kurade, Mayur B. & Salama, El-Sayed & El-Dalatony, Marwa M. & Ha, Geon-Soo & Chang, Soon Woong & Jeon, Byong-Hun, 2019. "Perspective on anaerobic digestion for biomethanation in cold environments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 85-95.
    19. Mukherjee, C. & Denney, J. & Mbonimpa, E.G. & Slagley, J. & Bhowmik, R., 2020. "A review on municipal solid waste-to-energy trends in the USA," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    20. Akhilesh Kumar Singh & Priti Pal & Saurabh Singh Rathore & Uttam Kumar Sahoo & Prakash Kumar Sarangi & Piotr Prus & Paweł Dziekański, 2023. "Sustainable Utilization of Biowaste Resources for Biogas Production to Meet Rural Bioenergy Requirements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-22, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:151-:d:470490. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.