IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i7p1785-d342591.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of SOC Estimation between the Integer-Order Model and Fractional-Order Model Under Different Operating Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Guoqing Jin

    (Chongqing Changan Automobile Co., Ltd., Chongqing 400023, China)

  • Lan Li

    (State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmissions, School of Automotive Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Yidan Xu

    (State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmissions, School of Automotive Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Minghui Hu

    (State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmissions, School of Automotive Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Chunyun Fu

    (State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmissions, School of Automotive Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

  • Datong Qin

    (State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmissions, School of Automotive Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China)

Abstract

Accurate estimation of the state of charge (SOC) is an important criterion to prevent the batteries from being over-charged or over-discharged, and this assures an electric vehicle’s safety and reliability. To investigate the effect of different operating conditions on the SOC estimation results, a dual-polarization model (DPM) and a fractional-order model (FOM) are established in this study, taking into account the prediction accuracy and structural complexity of a battery model. Based on these two battery equivalent circuit models (ECMs), a hybrid Kalman filter (HKF) algorithm is adopted to estimate the SOC of the battery; the algorithm comprehensively utilizes the ampere-hour (Ah) integration method, the Kalman filter (KF) algorithm, and the extended Kalman filter (EKF) algorithm. The SOC estimation results of the DPM and FOM, under the dynamic stress test (DST), federal urban driving schedule (FUDS), and hybrid pulse power characteristic (HPPC) cycle conditions, are compared and analyzed through six sets of experiments. Simulation results show that the SOC estimation accuracy of both the models is high and that the errors are within the range of ±0.06. Under any operating conditions, the SOC estimation error, based on the FOM, is always lower than the SOC estimation error of the DPM, but the adaptability of the FOM is not as high as that of the DPM.

Suggested Citation

  • Guoqing Jin & Lan Li & Yidan Xu & Minghui Hu & Chunyun Fu & Datong Qin, 2020. "Comparison of SOC Estimation between the Integer-Order Model and Fractional-Order Model Under Different Operating Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:7:p:1785-:d:342591
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/7/1785/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/7/1785/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang Zhang & Bo Guo, 2015. "Online Capacity Estimation of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Novel Feature Extraction and Adaptive Multi-Kernel Relevance Vector Machine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Farmann, Alexander & Sauer, Dirk Uwe, 2018. "Comparative study of reduced order equivalent circuit models for on-board state-of-available-power prediction of lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 1102-1122.
    3. Qingxia Yang & Jun Xu & Binggang Cao & Xiuqing Li, 2017. "A simplified fractional order impedance model and parameter identification method for lithium-ion batteries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, February.
    4. Xiong, Rui & Sun, Fengchun & Chen, Zheng & He, Hongwen, 2014. "A data-driven multi-scale extended Kalman filtering based parameter and state estimation approach of lithium-ion olymer battery in electric vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 463-476.
    5. Sun, Fengchun & Hu, Xiaosong & Zou, Yuan & Li, Siguang, 2011. "Adaptive unscented Kalman filtering for state of charge estimation of a lithium-ion battery for electric vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3531-3540.
    6. Hu, Minghui & Li, Yunxiao & Li, Shuxian & Fu, Chunyun & Qin, Datong & Li, Zonghua, 2018. "Lithium-ion battery modeling and parameter identification based on fractional theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 153-163.
    7. He, HongWen & Zhang, YongZhi & Xiong, Rui & Wang, Chun, 2015. "A novel Gaussian model based battery state estimation approach: State-of-Energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 41-48.
    8. Ng, Kong Soon & Moo, Chin-Sien & Chen, Yi-Ping & Hsieh, Yao-Ching, 2009. "Enhanced coulomb counting method for estimating state-of-charge and state-of-health of lithium-ion batteries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(9), pages 1506-1511, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xin Zhang & Jiawei Hou & Zekun Wang & Yueqiu Jiang, 2022. "Joint SOH-SOC Estimation Model for Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on GWO-BP Neural Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Carlos Augusto Berlitz & Andrea Pietrelli & Fabien Mieyeville & Gaël Pillonnet & Bruno Allard, 2023. "Microbial Fuel Cell as Battery Range Extender for Frugal IoT," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Neha Bhushan & Saad Mekhilef & Kok Soon Tey & Mohamed Shaaban & Mehdi Seyedmahmoudian & Alex Stojcevski, 2022. "Overview of Model- and Non-Model-Based Online Battery Management Systems for Electric Vehicle Applications: A Comprehensive Review of Experimental and Simulation Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-31, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yujie & Tian, Jiaqiang & Sun, Zhendong & Wang, Li & Xu, Ruilong & Li, Mince & Chen, Zonghai, 2020. "A comprehensive review of battery modeling and state estimation approaches for advanced battery management systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    2. Lin, Cheng & Mu, Hao & Xiong, Rui & Cao, Jiayi, 2017. "Multi-model probabilities based state fusion estimation method of lithium-ion battery for electric vehicles: State-of-energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 560-568.
    3. Ingvild B. Espedal & Asanthi Jinasena & Odne S. Burheim & Jacob J. Lamb, 2021. "Current Trends for State-of-Charge (SoC) Estimation in Lithium-Ion Battery Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-24, June.
    4. Turksoy, Arzu & Teke, Ahmet & Alkaya, Alkan, 2020. "A comprehensive overview of the dc-dc converter-based battery charge balancing methods in electric vehicles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    5. Wenxian Duan & Chuanxue Song & Silun Peng & Feng Xiao & Yulong Shao & Shixin Song, 2020. "An Improved Gated Recurrent Unit Network Model for State-of-Charge Estimation of Lithium-Ion Battery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Hu, Lin & Hu, Xiaosong & Che, Yunhong & Feng, Fei & Lin, Xianke & Zhang, Zhiyong, 2020. "Reliable state of charge estimation of battery packs using fuzzy adaptive federated filtering," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    7. He, Hongwen & Xiong, Rui & Peng, Jiankun, 2016. "Real-time estimation of battery state-of-charge with unscented Kalman filter and RTOS μCOS-II platform," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1410-1418.
    8. Shahjalal, Mohammad & Roy, Probir Kumar & Shams, Tamanna & Fly, Ashley & Chowdhury, Jahedul Islam & Ahmed, Md. Rishad & Liu, Kailong, 2022. "A review on second-life of Li-ion batteries: prospects, challenges, and issues," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    9. Cuma, Mehmet Ugras & Koroglu, Tahsin, 2015. "A comprehensive review on estimation strategies used in hybrid and battery electric vehicles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 517-531.
    10. Yang, Jufeng & Huang, Wenxin & Xia, Bing & Mi, Chris, 2019. "The improved open-circuit voltage characterization test using active polarization voltage reduction method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 682-694.
    11. Guo, Feng & Hu, Guangdi & Xiang, Shun & Zhou, Pengkai & Hong, Ru & Xiong, Neng, 2019. "A multi-scale parameter adaptive method for state of charge and parameter estimation of lithium-ion batteries using dual Kalman filters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 79-88.
    12. Shrivastava, Prashant & Soon, Tey Kok & Idris, Mohd Yamani Idna Bin & Mekhilef, Saad, 2019. "Overview of model-based online state-of-charge estimation using Kalman filter family for lithium-ion batteries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    13. Dong, Guangzhong & Zhang, Xu & Zhang, Chenbin & Chen, Zonghai, 2015. "A method for state of energy estimation of lithium-ion batteries based on neural network model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 879-888.
    14. Yong Tian & Bizhong Xia & Mingwang Wang & Wei Sun & Zhihui Xu, 2014. "Comparison Study on Two Model-Based Adaptive Algorithms for SOC Estimation of Lithium-Ion Batteries in Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-19, December.
    15. Tang, Xiaopeng & Liu, Boyang & Lv, Zhou & Gao, Furong, 2017. "Observer based battery SOC estimation: Using multi-gain-switching approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1275-1283.
    16. Taimoor Zahid & Weimin Li, 2016. "A Comparative Study Based on the Least Square Parameter Identification Method for State of Charge Estimation of a LiFePO 4 Battery Pack Using Three Model-Based Algorithms for Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-16, September.
    17. Hu, Chao & Jain, Gaurav & Tamirisa, Prabhakar & Gorka, Tom, 2014. "Method for estimating capacity and predicting remaining useful life of lithium-ion battery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 182-189.
    18. Bizhong Xia & Zizhou Lao & Ruifeng Zhang & Yong Tian & Guanghao Chen & Zhen Sun & Wei Wang & Wei Sun & Yongzhi Lai & Mingwang Wang & Huawen Wang, 2017. "Online Parameter Identification and State of Charge Estimation of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Forgetting Factor Recursive Least Squares and Nonlinear Kalman Filter," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-23, December.
    19. Bizhong Xia & Zhen Sun & Ruifeng Zhang & Deyu Cui & Zizhou Lao & Wei Wang & Wei Sun & Yongzhi Lai & Mingwang Wang, 2017. "A Comparative Study of Three Improved Algorithms Based on Particle Filter Algorithms in SOC Estimation of Lithium Ion Batteries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.
    20. Dai, Haifeng & Xu, Tianjiao & Zhu, Letao & Wei, Xuezhe & Sun, Zechang, 2016. "Adaptive model parameter identification for large capacity Li-ion batteries on separated time scales," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 119-131.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:7:p:1785-:d:342591. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.