IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v237y2019icp682-694.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The improved open-circuit voltage characterization test using active polarization voltage reduction method

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Jufeng
  • Huang, Wenxin
  • Xia, Bing
  • Mi, Chris

Abstract

The correlation between state of charge (SoC) and open-circuit voltage (OCV) is a crucial characteristic parameter in many aspects of the battery management system (BMS). However, it is a challenging task to obtain the accurate SoC-OCV correlation with a high test efficiency. In this paper, an improved OCV characterization test is proposed to actively reduce the polarization voltage. Based on the third-order equivalent circuit model (ECM), two sets of current pulses are applied to accelerate the convergence of the battery terminal voltage, thus the test time is effectively shortened compared to the conventional incremental OCV characterization test. Furthermore, the parametric sensitivity of the imposed current excitation to battery model parameters is analyzed. Subsequently, the parametric determination method for the imposed current excitation is provided. Experiments are conducted on a lithium-ion polymer battery to prove the feasibility of the proposed test procedure. Comparison with the conventional OCV characterization test further demonstrated the superiority of the proposed test procedure.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Jufeng & Huang, Wenxin & Xia, Bing & Mi, Chris, 2019. "The improved open-circuit voltage characterization test using active polarization voltage reduction method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C), pages 682-694.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:237:y:2019:i:c:p:682-694
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261919300601
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.060?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Waag, Wladislaw & Sauer, Dirk Uwe, 2013. "Adaptive estimation of the electromotive force of the lithium-ion battery after current interruption for an accurate state-of-charge and capacity determination," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 416-427.
    2. Dai, Haifeng & Wei, Xuezhe & Sun, Zechang & Wang, Jiayuan & Gu, Weijun, 2012. "Online cell SOC estimation of Li-ion battery packs using a dual time-scale Kalman filtering for EV applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 227-237.
    3. Yang, Jufeng & Xia, Bing & Huang, Wenxin & Fu, Yuhong & Mi, Chris, 2018. "Online state-of-health estimation for lithium-ion batteries using constant-voltage charging current analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1589-1600.
    4. Diao, Weiping & Xue, Nan & Bhattacharjee, Vikram & Jiang, Jiuchun & Karabasoglu, Orkun & Pecht, Michael, 2018. "Active battery cell equalization based on residual available energy maximization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 690-698.
    5. Zheng, Fangdan & Xing, Yinjiao & Jiang, Jiuchun & Sun, Bingxiang & Kim, Jonghoon & Pecht, Michael, 2016. "Influence of different open circuit voltage tests on state of charge online estimation for lithium-ion batteries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 513-525.
    6. Lin, Cheng & Yu, Quanqing & Xiong, Rui & Wang, Le Yi, 2017. "A study on the impact of open circuit voltage tests on state of charge estimation for lithium-ion batteries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 892-902.
    7. Sun, Fengchun & Xiong, Rui & He, Hongwen & Li, Weiqing & Aussems, Johan Eric Emmanuel, 2012. "Model-based dynamic multi-parameter method for peak power estimation of lithium–ion batteries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 378-386.
    8. Mu, Hao & Xiong, Rui & Zheng, Hongfei & Chang, Yuhua & Chen, Zeyu, 2017. "A novel fractional order model based state-of-charge estimation method for lithium-ion battery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 384-393.
    9. Kang, Jianqiang & Yan, Fuwu & Zhang, Pei & Du, Changqing, 2014. "Comparison of comprehensive properties of Ni-MH (nickel-metal hydride) and Li-ion (lithium-ion) batteries in terms of energy efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 618-625.
    10. Farmann, Alexander & Sauer, Dirk Uwe, 2018. "Comparative study of reduced order equivalent circuit models for on-board state-of-available-power prediction of lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 1102-1122.
    11. Jufeng Yang & Bing Xia & Yunlong Shang & Wenxin Huang & Chris Mi, 2016. "Improved Battery Parameter Estimation Method Considering Operating Scenarios for HEV/EV Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-20, December.
    12. Zhu, Wenhua H. & Zhu, Ying & Davis, Zenda & Tatarchuk, Bruce J., 2013. "Energy efficiency and capacity retention of Ni–MH batteries for storage applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 307-313.
    13. Li, Shi & Pischinger, Stefan & He, Chaoyi & Liang, Liliuyuan & Stapelbroek, Michael, 2018. "A comparative study of model-based capacity estimation algorithms in dual estimation frameworks for lithium-ion batteries under an accelerated aging test," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1522-1536.
    14. Ng, Kong Soon & Moo, Chin-Sien & Chen, Yi-Ping & Hsieh, Yao-Ching, 2009. "Enhanced coulomb counting method for estimating state-of-charge and state-of-health of lithium-ion batteries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(9), pages 1506-1511, September.
    15. Xing, Yinjiao & He, Wei & Pecht, Michael & Tsui, Kwok Leung, 2014. "State of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries using the open-circuit voltage at various ambient temperatures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 106-115.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmed, Mostafa Shaban & Raihan, Sheikh Arif & Balasingam, Balakumar, 2020. "A scaling approach for improved state of charge representation in rechargeable batteries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    2. Yang, Jufeng & Cai, Yingfeng & Pan, Chaofeng & Mi, Chris, 2019. "A novel resistor-inductor network-based equivalent circuit model of lithium-ion batteries under constant-voltage charging condition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    3. Gao, Yizhao & Sun, Ziqiang & Zhang, Dong & Shi, Dapai & Zhang, Xi, 2023. "Determination of half-cell open-circuit potential curve of silicon-graphite in a physics-based model for lithium-ion batteries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 349(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmed, Mostafa Shaban & Raihan, Sheikh Arif & Balasingam, Balakumar, 2020. "A scaling approach for improved state of charge representation in rechargeable batteries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    2. Oh, Ki-Yong & Epureanu, Bogdan I., 2016. "Characterization and modeling of the thermal mechanics of lithium-ion battery cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 633-646.
    3. Shrivastava, Prashant & Soon, Tey Kok & Idris, Mohd Yamani Idna Bin & Mekhilef, Saad, 2019. "Overview of model-based online state-of-charge estimation using Kalman filter family for lithium-ion batteries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Muhammad Umair Ali & Amad Zafar & Sarvar Hussain Nengroo & Sadam Hussain & Muhammad Junaid Alvi & Hee-Je Kim, 2019. "Towards a Smarter Battery Management System for Electric Vehicle Applications: A Critical Review of Lithium-Ion Battery State of Charge Estimation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-33, January.
    5. Wang, Yujie & Zhang, Chenbin & Chen, Zonghai, 2015. "A method for state-of-charge estimation of Li-ion batteries based on multi-model switching strategy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 427-434.
    6. Wang, Yujie & Tian, Jiaqiang & Sun, Zhendong & Wang, Li & Xu, Ruilong & Li, Mince & Chen, Zonghai, 2020. "A comprehensive review of battery modeling and state estimation approaches for advanced battery management systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    7. Avvari, G.V. & Pattipati, B. & Balasingam, B. & Pattipati, K.R. & Bar-Shalom, Y., 2015. "Experimental set-up and procedures to test and validate battery fuel gauge algorithms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 404-418.
    8. Ruifeng Zhang & Bizhong Xia & Baohua Li & Libo Cao & Yongzhi Lai & Weiwei Zheng & Huawen Wang & Wei Wang, 2018. "State of the Art of Lithium-Ion Battery SOC Estimation for Electrical Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-36, July.
    9. Ingvild B. Espedal & Asanthi Jinasena & Odne S. Burheim & Jacob J. Lamb, 2021. "Current Trends for State-of-Charge (SoC) Estimation in Lithium-Ion Battery Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-24, June.
    10. Fan, Guodong & Li, Xiaoyu & Zhang, Ruigang, 2021. "Global Sensitivity Analysis on Temperature-Dependent Parameters of A Reduced-Order Electrochemical Model And Robust State-of-Charge Estimation at Different Temperatures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    11. Ng, Selina S.Y. & Xing, Yinjiao & Tsui, Kwok L., 2014. "A naive Bayes model for robust remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion battery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 114-123.
    12. Li, Shi & Pischinger, Stefan & He, Chaoyi & Liang, Liliuyuan & Stapelbroek, Michael, 2018. "A comparative study of model-based capacity estimation algorithms in dual estimation frameworks for lithium-ion batteries under an accelerated aging test," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1522-1536.
    13. He, Hongwen & Xiong, Rui & Peng, Jiankun, 2016. "Real-time estimation of battery state-of-charge with unscented Kalman filter and RTOS μCOS-II platform," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1410-1418.
    14. Wang, Yujie & Zhang, Chenbin & Chen, Zonghai, 2014. "A method for joint estimation of state-of-charge and available energy of LiFePO4 batteries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 81-87.
    15. Cuma, Mehmet Ugras & Koroglu, Tahsin, 2015. "A comprehensive review on estimation strategies used in hybrid and battery electric vehicles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 517-531.
    16. Sun, Daoming & Yu, Xiaoli & Wang, Chongming & Zhang, Cheng & Huang, Rui & Zhou, Quan & Amietszajew, Taz & Bhagat, Rohit, 2021. "State of charge estimation for lithium-ion battery based on an Intelligent Adaptive Extended Kalman Filter with improved noise estimator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    17. Dong, Guangzhong & Zhang, Xu & Zhang, Chenbin & Chen, Zonghai, 2015. "A method for state of energy estimation of lithium-ion batteries based on neural network model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 879-888.
    18. Yong Tian & Bizhong Xia & Mingwang Wang & Wei Sun & Zhihui Xu, 2014. "Comparison Study on Two Model-Based Adaptive Algorithms for SOC Estimation of Lithium-Ion Batteries in Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-19, December.
    19. Theodoros Kalogiannis & Md Sazzad Hosen & Mohsen Akbarzadeh Sokkeh & Shovon Goutam & Joris Jaguemont & Lu Jin & Geng Qiao & Maitane Berecibar & Joeri Van Mierlo, 2019. "Comparative Study on Parameter Identification Methods for Dual-Polarization Lithium-Ion Equivalent Circuit Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-35, October.
    20. Seo, Minhwan & Song, Youngbin & Kim, Jake & Paek, Sung Wook & Kim, Gi-Heon & Kim, Sang Woo, 2021. "Innovative lumped-battery model for state of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries under various ambient temperatures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:237:y:2019:i:c:p:682-694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.