IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i16p4175-d398115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Laboratory Testing of Novel Polyfraction Nanoemulsion for EOR Processes in Carbonate Formations

Author

Listed:
  • Piotr Kasza

    (Oil and Gas Institute—National Research Institute, 25A Lubicz str., 31-503 Krakow, Poland)

  • Marek Czupski

    (Oil and Gas Institute—National Research Institute, 25A Lubicz str., 31-503 Krakow, Poland)

  • Klaudia Wilk

    (Oil and Gas Institute—National Research Institute, 25A Lubicz str., 31-503 Krakow, Poland)

  • Mateusz Masłowski

    (Oil and Gas Institute—National Research Institute, 25A Lubicz str., 31-503 Krakow, Poland)

  • Rafał Moska

    (Oil and Gas Institute—National Research Institute, 25A Lubicz str., 31-503 Krakow, Poland)

  • Łukasz Leśniak

    (Brenntag Polska, Jana Bema 21 str., 47-224 Kędzierzyn Koźle, Poland)

Abstract

Nanoemulsions and polymers are widely used for increasing the efficiency of enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes. The application of both these additives enables the synergistic use of several physical phenomena that are crucial to the process. One of the methods used for assessing these processes is laboratory core flooding tests using natural cores. In various experiments, carbonate rocks are subjected to oil displacement under high pressure and temperature. Polymer solutions and a newly developed polyfraction nanoemulsion are tested. The test results confirm the usefulness of these products for EOR processes and demonstrate their stability under high pressure, high temperature, and in the presence of H 2 S. Under these conditions the polymers maintain high efficiency in displacing crude oil from carbonate rocks, while the tested nanoemulsion improves the wettability of carbonate rocks and reduces interfacial tension, factors which increase the efficiency of oil displacement.The best result in the laboratory EOR simulation was obtained for polymer and nanoemulsion concentrations in dilute reservoir water of 0.05% and 1%, respectively. In this case, the measured oil recovery was 37.5% higher than that obtained when using water without additives.

Suggested Citation

  • Piotr Kasza & Marek Czupski & Klaudia Wilk & Mateusz Masłowski & Rafał Moska & Łukasz Leśniak, 2020. "Laboratory Testing of Novel Polyfraction Nanoemulsion for EOR Processes in Carbonate Formations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:16:p:4175-:d:398115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/16/4175/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/16/4175/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew Martin, 1997. "Introduction," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19.
    2. Vladimir Alvarado & Eduardo Manrique, 2010. "Enhanced Oil Recovery: An Update Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 3(9), pages 1-47, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Druetta, P. & Raffa, P. & Picchioni, F., 2019. "Chemical enhanced oil recovery and the role of chemical product design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Anas M. Hassan & Mohammed Ayoub & Mysara Eissa & Emad W. Al-Shalabi & Abdullah Al-Mansour & Abdulrahman Al-Quraishi, 2022. "Increasing Reservoir Recovery Efficiency through Laboratory-Proven Hybrid Smart Water-Assisted Foam (SWAF) Flooding in Carbonate Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-50, April.
    3. Schmidt, Manfred G., 2001. "Parteien und Staatstätigkeit," Working papers of the ZeS 02/2001, University of Bremen, Centre for Social Policy Research (ZeS).
    4. Xiankang Xin & Yiqiang Li & Gaoming Yu & Weiying Wang & Zhongzhi Zhang & Maolin Zhang & Wenli Ke & Debin Kong & Keliu Wu & Zhangxin Chen, 2017. "Non-Newtonian Flow Characteristics of Heavy Oil in the Bohai Bay Oilfield: Experimental and Simulation Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, October.
    5. Samin Raziperchikolaee & Ashwin Pasumarti & Srikanta Mishra, 2020. "The effect of natural fractures on CO2 storage performance and oil recovery from CO2 and WAG injection in an Appalachian basin reservoir," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(5), pages 1098-1114, October.
    6. Bera, Achinta & Babadagli, Tayfun, 2015. "Status of electromagnetic heating for enhanced heavy oil/bitumen recovery and future prospects: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 206-226.
    7. Welkenhuysen, Kris & Rupert, Jort & Compernolle, Tine & Ramirez, Andrea & Swennen, Rudy & Piessens, Kris, 2017. "Considering economic and geological uncertainty in the simulation of realistic investment decisions for CO2-EOR projects in the North Sea," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 745-761.
    8. Rui Dias & Paulo Alexandre & Nuno Teixeira & Mariana Chambino, 2023. "Clean Energy Stocks: Resilient Safe Havens in the Volatility of Dirty Cryptocurrencies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-24, July.
    9. Adedapo N. Awolayo & Hemanta K. Sarma & Long X. Nghiem, 2018. "Brine-Dependent Recovery Processes in Carbonate and Sandstone Petroleum Reservoirs: Review of Laboratory-Field Studies, Interfacial Mechanisms and Modeling Attempts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-66, November.
    10. Mattia Boscherini & Alba Storione & Matteo Minelli & Francesco Miccio & Ferruccio Doghieri, 2023. "New Perspectives on Catalytic Hydrogen Production by the Reforming, Partial Oxidation and Decomposition of Methane and Biogas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-33, September.
    11. Gálvez, Akemi & Iglesias, Andrés, 2016. "Particle-based meta-model for continuous breakpoint optimization in smooth local-support curve fitting," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 275(C), pages 195-212.
    12. Amjed M. Hassan & Mohamed A. Mahmoud & Abdulaziz A. Al-Majed & Ayman R. Al-Nakhli & Mohammed A. Bataweel & Salaheldin Elkatatny, 2019. "Mitigation of Condensate Banking Using Thermochemical Treatment: Experimental and Analytical Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-12, February.
    13. Michele Fioretti & Alessandro Iaria & Aljoscha Janssen & Robert K Perrons & Clément Mazet-Sonilhac, 2022. "Innovation Begets Innovation and Concentration: the Case of Upstream Oil & Gas in the North Sea," Working Papers hal-03791971, HAL.
    14. David Martin & Sidney Swearingen, 2019. "Improving Environmental Justice Analysis of Urban Tree Ecosystem Services: A Case Study from Asheville, NC," Working Papers 19-01, Davidson College, Department of Economics.
    15. Laura Osma & Luis García & Romel Pérez & Carolina Barbosa & Jesús Botett & Jorge Sandoval & Eduardo Manrique, 2019. "Benefit–Cost and Energy Efficiency Index to Support the Screening of Hybrid Cyclic Steam Stimulation Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Ali Shafiei & Mohammad Ali Ahmadi & Maurice B. Dusseault & Ali Elkamel & Sohrab Zendehboudi & Ioannis Chatzis, 2018. "Data Analytics Techniques for Performance Prediction of Steamflooding in Naturally Fractured Carbonate Reservoirs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-29, January.
    17. Sayed Ameenuddin Irfan & Afza Shafie & Noorhana Yahya & Nooraini Zainuddin, 2019. "Mathematical Modeling and Simulation of Nanoparticle-Assisted Enhanced Oil Recovery—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.
    18. World Bank, 2003. "Nicaragua - Poverty Assessment : Raising Welfare and Reducing Vulnerability," World Bank Publications - Reports 14668, The World Bank Group.
    19. Bai, Mingxing & Zhang, Zhichao & Cui, Xiaona & Song, Kaoping, 2017. "Studies of injection parameters for chemical flooding in carbonate reservoirs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1464-1471.
    20. Simon P. Philbin, 2020. "Critical Analysis and Evaluation of the Technology Pathways for Carbon Capture and Utilization," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:16:p:4175-:d:398115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.