IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i9p1587-d226043.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wind Turbines on German Farms—An Economic Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Clemens Fuchs

    (University of Applied Sciences, Departement of Agricultural Economics, 17033 Neubrandenburg, Germany)

  • Karl Marquardt

    (University of Applied Sciences, Departement of Agricultural Economics, 17033 Neubrandenburg, Germany)

  • Joachim Kasten

    (University of Applied Sciences, Departement of Agricultural Economics, 17033 Neubrandenburg, Germany)

  • Katharina Skau

    (University of Applied Sciences, Departement of Agricultural Economics, 17033 Neubrandenburg, Germany)

Abstract

Only a small number of German farmers invest in wind turbines on the land they own; rather, they tend to lease land for that purpose to external investors. In this study, an explorative qualitative analysis of the reasons for this investment pattern was conducted. Calculations of the economic efficiency (e.g., net present value, payoff) of wind turbines built the foundation of the study. In addition, farmers in the northeastern federal state of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania were interviewed to assess their motives for capital expenditure. A considerable amount of equity capital is required to set up a wind turbine. The capital invested frequently competes with the purchase of agricultural land. Erecting wind turbines involves risks. Substantial financial means for planning permission and other examinations precede the construction of a wind turbine. Only at the very end of these costly investigations will a construction permit be issued; as such, farmers face a high level of uncertainty during the whole process. Fluctuations in wind yield resulting in volatile revenues confront farmers with additional financial uncertainties. The risk-taking behavior of farmers was assessed normatively by the Hurwicz criterion. The results showed that farmers with the necessary funds at their disposal and a high level of optimism were more likely to take the risk to set up a wind turbine on their own land. They make this decision despite the fact that leasing one’s own land to external investors is predictably profitable and clearly less risky.

Suggested Citation

  • Clemens Fuchs & Karl Marquardt & Joachim Kasten & Katharina Skau, 2019. "Wind Turbines on German Farms—An Economic Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:9:p:1587-:d:226043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/9/1587/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/9/1587/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bolinger, Mark & Wiser, Ryan, 2006. "A comparative analysis of business structures suitable for farmer-owned wind power projects in the United States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(14), pages 1750-1761, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sylwia Mrozowska & Jan A. Wendt & Krzysztof Tomaszewski, 2021. "The Challenges of Poland’s Energy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Copena, Damián & Simón, Xavier, 2018. "Wind farms and payments to landowners: Opportunities for rural development for the case of Galicia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 38-47.
    2. Shoeib, Eman Ahmed Hamed & Hamin Infield, Elisabeth & Renski, Henry C., 2021. "Measuring the impacts of wind energy projects on U.S. rural counties’ community services and cost of living," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    3. Bergek, Anna & Mignon, Ingrid & Sundberg, Gunnel, 2013. "Who invests in renewable electricity production? Empirical evidence and suggestions for further research," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 568-581.
    4. Scarcioffolo, Alexandre Ribeiro & Perobelli, Fernanda Finotti Cordeiro & Chimeli, Ariaster Baumgratz, 2018. "Counterfactual comparisons of investment options for wind power and agricultural production in the United States: Lessons from Northern Ohio," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 299-309.
    5. Zhu, Lei & Fan, Ying, 2010. "Optimization of China's generating portfolio and policy implications based on portfolio theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 1391-1402.
    6. Blokhuis, Erik & Advokaat, Bart & Schaefer, Wim, 2012. "Assessing the performance of Dutch local energy companies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 680-690.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:9:p:1587-:d:226043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.