IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v34y2006i14p1750-1761.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative analysis of business structures suitable for farmer-owned wind power projects in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Bolinger, Mark
  • Wiser, Ryan

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Bolinger, Mark & Wiser, Ryan, 2006. "A comparative analysis of business structures suitable for farmer-owned wind power projects in the United States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(14), pages 1750-1761, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:34:y:2006:i:14:p:1750-1761
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301-4215(05)00015-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clemens Fuchs & Karl Marquardt & Joachim Kasten & Katharina Skau, 2019. "Wind Turbines on German Farms—An Economic Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Scarcioffolo, Alexandre Ribeiro & Perobelli, Fernanda Finotti Cordeiro & Chimeli, Ariaster Baumgratz, 2018. "Counterfactual comparisons of investment options for wind power and agricultural production in the United States: Lessons from Northern Ohio," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 299-309.
    3. Shoeib, Eman Ahmed Hamed & Hamin Infield, Elisabeth & Renski, Henry C., 2021. "Measuring the impacts of wind energy projects on U.S. rural counties’ community services and cost of living," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    4. Zhu, Lei & Fan, Ying, 2010. "Optimization of China's generating portfolio and policy implications based on portfolio theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 1391-1402.
    5. Bergek, Anna & Mignon, Ingrid & Sundberg, Gunnel, 2013. "Who invests in renewable electricity production? Empirical evidence and suggestions for further research," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 568-581.
    6. Blokhuis, Erik & Advokaat, Bart & Schaefer, Wim, 2012. "Assessing the performance of Dutch local energy companies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 680-690.
    7. Copena, Damián & Simón, Xavier, 2018. "Wind farms and payments to landowners: Opportunities for rural development for the case of Galicia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 38-47.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:34:y:2006:i:14:p:1750-1761. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.