IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i24p4623-d294605.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parametric Optimization and Thermodynamic Performance Comparison of Organic Trans-Critical Cycle, Steam Flash Cycle, and Steam Dual-Pressure Cycle for Waste Heat Recovery

Author

Listed:
  • Liya Ren

    (MOE Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Low and Medium Grade Energy, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

  • Huaixin Wang

    (MOE Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Low and Medium Grade Energy, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

Abstract

Compared with the basic organic and steam Rankine cycles, the organic trans-critical cycle (OTC), steam flash cycle (SFC) and steam dual-pressure cycle (SDC) can be regarded as the improved cycle configurations for the waste heat power recovery since they can achieve better temperature matching between the heat source and working fluid in the heat addition process. This study investigates and compares the thermodynamic performance of the OTC, SFC, and SDC based on the waste heat source from the cement kiln with an initial temperature of 320 °C and mass flow rate of 86.2 kg/s. The effects of the main parameters on the cycle performance are analyzed and the parameter optimization is performed with net power output as the objective function. Results indicate that the maximum net power output of SDC is slightly higher than that of SFC and the OTC using n-pentane provides a 19.74% increase in net power output over the SDC since it can achieve the higher use of waste heat and higher turbine efficiency. However, the turbine inlet temperature of the OTC is limited by the thermal stability of the organic working fluid, hence the SDC outputs more power than that of the OTC when the initial temperature of the exhaust gas exceeds 415 °C.

Suggested Citation

  • Liya Ren & Huaixin Wang, 2019. "Parametric Optimization and Thermodynamic Performance Comparison of Organic Trans-Critical Cycle, Steam Flash Cycle, and Steam Dual-Pressure Cycle for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-22, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:24:p:4623-:d:294605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/24/4623/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/24/4623/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marco Altosole & Giovanni Benvenuto & Ugo Campora & Michele Laviola & Alessandro Trucco, 2017. "Waste Heat Recovery from Marine Gas Turbines and Diesel Engines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-24, May.
    2. Wang, Tianyou & Zhang, Yajun & Peng, Zhijun & Shu, Gequn, 2011. "A review of researches on thermal exhaust heat recovery with Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 2862-2871, August.
    3. Verschoor, M.J.E. & Brouwer, E.P., 1995. "Description of the SMR cycle, which combines fluid elements of steam and organic Rankine cycles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 295-303.
    4. Astolfi, Marco & Romano, Matteo C. & Bombarda, Paola & Macchi, Ennio, 2014. "Binary ORC (organic Rankine cycles) power plants for the exploitation of medium–low temperature geothermal sources – Part A: Thermodynamic optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 423-434.
    5. Fu, Jianqin & Liu, Jingping & Ren, Chengqin & Wang, Linjun & Deng, Banglin & Xu, Zhengxin, 2012. "An open steam power cycle used for IC engine exhaust gas energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 544-554.
    6. Astolfi, Marco & Romano, Matteo C. & Bombarda, Paola & Macchi, Ennio, 2014. "Binary ORC (Organic Rankine Cycles) power plants for the exploitation of medium–low temperature geothermal sources – Part B: Techno-economic optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 435-446.
    7. Toffolo, Andrea & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Manente, Giovanni & Paci, Marco, 2014. "A multi-criteria approach for the optimal selection of working fluid and design parameters in Organic Rankine Cycle systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 219-232.
    8. Wang, Jiangfeng & Yan, Zhequan & Wang, Man & Ma, Shaolin & Dai, Yiping, 2013. "Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of an (organic Rankine cycle) ORC using low grade heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 356-365.
    9. Manente, Giovanni & Da Lio, Luca & Lazzaretto, Andrea, 2016. "Influence of axial turbine efficiency maps on the performance of subcritical and supercritical Organic Rankine Cycle systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 761-772.
    10. Bao, Junjiang & Zhao, Li, 2013. "A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 325-342.
    11. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen & Liu, Qiang, 2018. "Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 409-421.
    12. Mondal, Subha & De, Sudipta, 2017. "Power by waste heat recovery from low temperature industrial flue gas by Organic Flash Cycle (OFC) and transcritical-CO2 power cycle: A comparative study through combined thermodynamic and economic an," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 832-840.
    13. Karellas, S. & Leontaritis, A.-D. & Panousis, G. & Bellos, E. & Kakaras, E., 2013. "Energetic and exergetic analysis of waste heat recovery systems in the cement industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 147-156.
    14. Jesper Graa Andreasen & Andrea Meroni & Fredrik Haglind, 2017. "A Comparison of Organic and Steam Rankine Cycle Power Systems for Waste Heat Recovery on Large Ships," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, April.
    15. Li, Chengyu & Wang, Huaixin, 2016. "Power cycles for waste heat recovery from medium to high temperature flue gas sources – from a view of thermodynamic optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 707-721.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liya Ren & Huaixin Wang, 2020. "Optimization and Comparison of Two Combined Cycles Consisting of CO 2 and Organic Trans-Critical Cycle for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liya Ren & Jianyu Liu & Huaixin Wang, 2020. "Thermodynamic Optimization of a Waste Heat Power System under Economic Constraint," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Meroni, Andrea & Andreasen, Jesper Graa & Persico, Giacomo & Haglind, Fredrik, 2018. "Optimization of organic Rankine cycle power systems considering multistage axial turbine design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 339-354.
    3. Martelli, Emanuele & Capra, Federico & Consonni, Stefano, 2015. "Numerical optimization of Combined Heat and Power Organic Rankine Cycles – Part A: Design optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 310-328.
    4. Yu, Haoshui & Eason, John & Biegler, Lorenz T. & Feng, Xiao, 2017. "Simultaneous heat integration and techno-economic optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for multiple waste heat stream recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 322-333.
    5. Li, Jing & Alvi, Jahan Zeb & Pei, Gang & Su, Yuehong & Li, Pengcheng & Gao, Guangtao & Ji, Jie, 2016. "Modelling of organic Rankine cycle efficiency with respect to the equivalent hot side temperature," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 668-683.
    6. van Kleef, Luuk M.T. & Oyewunmi, Oyeniyi A. & Markides, Christos N., 2019. "Multi-objective thermo-economic optimization of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) power systems in waste-heat recovery applications using computer-aided molecular design techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Mondejar, M.E. & Andreasen, J.G. & Pierobon, L. & Larsen, U. & Thern, M. & Haglind, F., 2018. "A review of the use of organic Rankine cycle power systems for maritime applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 126-151.
    8. Andreas Diga Pratama Putera & Annisa Nurul Hidayah & Alison Subiantoro, 2019. "Thermo-Economic Analysis of A Geothermal Binary Power Plant in Indonesia—A Pre-Feasibility Case Study of the Wayang Windu Site," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-19, November.
    9. Li, Chengyu & Wang, Huaixin, 2016. "Power cycles for waste heat recovery from medium to high temperature flue gas sources – from a view of thermodynamic optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 707-721.
    10. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua, 2016. "Economic performances optimization of an organic Rankine cycle system with lower global warming potential working fluids in geothermal application," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 1201-1213.
    11. Lee, Ung & Mitsos, Alexander, 2017. "Optimal multicomponent working fluid of organic Rankine cycle for exergy transfer from liquefied natural gas regasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 489-501.
    12. Steven Lecompte & Sanne Lemmens & Henk Huisseune & Martijn Van den Broek & Michel De Paepe, 2015. "Multi-Objective Thermo-Economic Optimization Strategy for ORCs Applied to Subcritical and Transcritical Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-28, April.
    13. Youcef Redjeb & Khatima Kaabeche-Djerafi & Anna Stoppato & Alberto Benato, 2021. "The IRC-PD Tool: A Code to Design Steam and Organic Waste Heat Recovery Units," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-37, September.
    14. Lira-Barragán, Luis Fernando & Ponce-Ortega, José María & Serna-González, Medardo & El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M., 2014. "Optimal design of process energy systems integrating sustainable considerations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 139-160.
    15. Zhang, Jianan & Qin, Kan & Li, Daijin & Luo, Kai & Dang, Jianjun, 2020. "Potential of Organic Rankine Cycles for Unmanned Underwater Vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    16. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua, 2015. "Thermo-economic optimization of an organic Rankine cycle system for large marine diesel engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 256-268.
    17. Van Erdeweghe, Sarah & Van Bael, Johan & Laenen, Ben & D’haeseleer, William, 2019. "Design and off-design optimization procedure for low-temperature geothermal organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 716-731.
    18. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2017. "Integrated thermoeconomic optimization of standard and regenerative ORC for different heat source types and capacities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 570-598.
    19. Liu, Qiang & Shang, Linlin & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2016. "Performance analyses of a hybrid geothermal–fossil power generation system using low-enthalpy geothermal resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 149-162.
    20. Guido Francesco Frate & Lorenzo Ferrari & Umberto Desideri, 2020. "Rankine Carnot Batteries with the Integration of Thermal Energy Sources: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-28, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:24:p:4623-:d:294605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.