IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i18p3508-d266446.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Large Eddy Simulation of an Onshore Wind Farm with the Actuator Line Model Including Wind Turbine’s Control below and above Rated Wind Speed

Author

Listed:
  • Andrés Guggeri

    (IMFIA, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de la República, 11200 Montevideo, Uruguay)

  • Martín Draper

    (IMFIA, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de la República, 11200 Montevideo, Uruguay)

Abstract

As the size of wind turbines increases and their hub heights become higher, which partially explains the vertiginous increase of wind power worldwide in the last decade, the interaction of wind turbines with the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) and between each other is becoming more complex. There are different approaches to model and compute the aerodynamic loads, and hence the power production, on wind turbines subject to ABL inflow conditions ranging from the classical Blade Element Momentum (BEM) method to Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) approaches. Also, modern multi-MW wind turbines have a torque controller and a collective pitch controller to manage power output, particularly in maximizing power production or when it is required to down-regulate their production. In this work the results of a validated numerical method, based on a Large Eddy Simulation-Actuator Line Model framework, was applied to simulate a real 7.7 MNW onshore wind farm on Uruguay under different wind conditions, and hence operational situations are shown with the aim to assess the capability of this approach to model actual wind farm dynamics. A description of the implementation of these controllers in the CFD solver Caffa3d, presenting the methodology applied to obtain the controller parameters, is included. For validation, the simulation results were compared with 1 Hz data obtained from the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition System of the wind farm, focusing on the temporal evolution of the following variables: Wind velocity, rotor angular speed, pitch angle, and electric power. In addition to this, simulations applying active power control at the wind turbine level are presented under different de-rate signals, both constant and time-varying, and were subject to different wind speed profiles and wind directions where there was interaction between wind turbines and their wakes.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrés Guggeri & Martín Draper, 2019. "Large Eddy Simulation of an Onshore Wind Farm with the Actuator Line Model Including Wind Turbine’s Control below and above Rated Wind Speed," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:18:p:3508-:d:266446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/18/3508/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/18/3508/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stevens, Richard J.A.M. & Martínez-Tossas, Luis A. & Meneveau, Charles, 2018. "Comparison of wind farm large eddy simulations using actuator disk and actuator line models with wind tunnel experiments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 470-478.
    2. Fernando Porté-Agel & Yu-Ting Wu & Chang-Hung Chen, 2013. "A Numerical Study of the Effects of Wind Direction on Turbine Wakes and Power Losses in a Large Wind Farm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Sayed, M. & Klein, L. & Lutz, Th. & Krämer, E., 2019. "The impact of the aerodynamic model fidelity on the aeroelastic response of a multi-megawatt wind turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 304-318.
    4. Yang, Xiaolei & Pakula, Maggie & Sotiropoulos, Fotis, 2018. "Large-eddy simulation of a utility-scale wind farm in complex terrain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 767-777.
    5. Bai, Chi-Jeng & Wang, Wei-Cheng, 2016. "Review of computational and experimental approaches to analysis of aerodynamic performance in horizontal-axis wind turbines (HAWTs)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 506-519.
    6. Li, Y. & Castro, A.M. & Martin, J.E. & Sinokrot, T. & Prescott, W. & Carrica, P.M., 2017. "Coupled computational fluid dynamics/multibody dynamics method for wind turbine aero-servo-elastic simulation including drivetrain dynamics," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 1037-1051.
    7. Ryan Wiser & Karen Jenni & Joachim Seel & Erin Baker & Maureen Hand & Eric Lantz & Aaron Smith, 2016. "Expert elicitation survey on future wind energy costs," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 1(10), pages 1-8, October.
    8. Til Kristian Vrana & Damian Flynn & Emilio Gomez‐Lazaro & Juha Kiviluoma & Davy Marcel & Nicolaos Cutululis & J. Charles Smith, 2018. "Wind power within European grid codes: Evolution, status and outlook," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(3), May.
    9. Umberto Ciri & Giovandomenico Petrolo & Maria Vittoria Salvetti & Stefano Leonardi, 2017. "Large-Eddy Simulations of Two In-Line Turbines in a Wind Tunnel with Different Inflow Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-23, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cao, Jiu Fa & Zhu, Wei Jun & Shen, Wen Zhong & Sørensen, Jens Nørkær & Sun, Zhen Ye, 2020. "Optimizing wind energy conversion efficiency with respect to noise: A study on multi-criteria wind farm layout design," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 468-485.
    2. Qian, Guo-Wei & Song, Yun-Peng & Ishihara, Takeshi, 2022. "A control-oriented large eddy simulation of wind turbine wake considering effects of Coriolis force and time-varying wind conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).
    3. Rebecca J. Barthelmie & Tristan J. Shepherd & Jeanie A. Aird & Sara C. Pryor, 2020. "Power and Wind Shear Implications of Large Wind Turbine Scenarios in the US Central Plains," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Qiang & Luo, Kun & Yuan, Renyu & Wang, Shuai & Fan, Jianren & Cen, Kefa, 2020. "A multiscale numerical framework coupled with control strategies for simulating a wind farm in complex terrain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    2. Jagdeep Singh & Jahrul M Alam, 2023. "Large-Eddy Simulation of Utility-Scale Wind Farm Sited over Complex Terrain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-26, August.
    3. Tristan Revaz & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2021. "Large-Eddy Simulation of Wind Turbine Flows: A New Evaluation of Actuator Disk Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    4. Ahmadi, Mohammad H.B. & Yang, Zhiyin, 2020. "Numerical study of the coupling between the instantaneous blade loading/power of an axial wind turbine and upstream turbulence at high Reynolds numbers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    5. Zheng, Jiancai & Wang, Nina & Wan, Decheng & Strijhak, Sergei, 2023. "Numerical investigations of coupled aeroelastic performance of wind turbines by elastic actuator line model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 330(PB).
    6. Dhiman, Harsh S. & Deb, Dipankar & Foley, Aoife M., 2020. "Lidar assisted wake redirection in wind farms: A data driven approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 484-493.
    7. Zhaobin Li & Xiaohao Liu & Xiaolei Yang, 2022. "Review of Turbine Parameterization Models for Large-Eddy Simulation of Wind Turbine Wakes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-28, September.
    8. Khan, Mehtab Ahmad & Javed, Adeel & Shakir, Sehar & Syed, Abdul Haseeb, 2021. "Optimization of a wind farm by coupled actuator disk and mesoscale models to mitigate neighboring wind farm wake interference from repowering perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    9. Yunliang Li & Zhaobin Li & Zhideng Zhou & Xiaolei Yang, 2023. "Large-Eddy Simulation of Wind Turbine Wakes in Forest Terrain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-23, March.
    10. Ahmadi, Mohammad H.B. & Yang, Zhiyin, 2021. "On wind turbine power fluctuations induced by large-scale motions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    11. Carl R. Shapiro & Genevieve M. Starke & Charles Meneveau & Dennice F. Gayme, 2019. "A Wake Modeling Paradigm for Wind Farm Design and Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, August.
    12. Eid Gul & Giorgio Baldinelli & Pietro Bartocci, 2022. "Energy Transition: Renewable Energy-Based Combined Heat and Power Optimization Model for Distributed Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.
    13. Mauro, S. & Lanzafame, R. & Messina, M. & Brusca, S., 2023. "On the importance of the root-to-hub adapter effects on HAWT performance: A CFD-BEM numerical investigation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    14. Wang, Peilin & Liu, Qingsong & Li, Chun & Miao, Weipao & Yue, Minnan & Xu, Zifei, 2022. "Investigation of the aerodynamic characteristics of horizontal axis wind turbine using an active flow control method via boundary layer suction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 1032-1048.
    15. Stosic, Tatijana & Telesca, Luciano & Stosic, Borko, 2021. "Multiparametric statistical and dynamical analysis of angular high-frequency wind speed time series," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 566(C).
    16. Rubio-Domingo, G. & Linares, P., 2021. "The future investment costs of offshore wind: An estimation based on auction results," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    17. Shirizadeh, Behrang & Quirion, Philippe, 2021. "Low-carbon options for the French power sector: What role for renewables, nuclear energy and carbon capture and storage?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    18. Jiufa Cao & Weijun Zhu & Xinbo Wu & Tongguang Wang & Haoran Xu, 2018. "An Aero-acoustic Noise Distribution Prediction Methodology for Offshore Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    19. Albara M. Mustafa & Abbas Barabadi, 2022. "Criteria-Based Fuzzy Logic Risk Analysis of Wind Farms Operation in Cold Climate Regions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    20. Shields, Matt & Beiter, Philipp & Nunemaker, Jake & Cooperman, Aubryn & Duffy, Patrick, 2021. "Impacts of turbine and plant upsizing on the levelized cost of energy for offshore wind," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:18:p:3508-:d:266446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.