IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i14p2784-d249978.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Battery Remaining Useful Life Prediction with Inheritance Particle Filtering

Author

Listed:
  • Lin Li

    (Industry 4.0 Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, School of Computer Science and Technology, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan 523808, China)

  • Alfredo Alan Flores Saldivar

    (Industry 4.0 Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, School of Computer Science and Technology, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan 523808, China)

  • Yun Bai

    (Industry 4.0 Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, School of Computer Science and Technology, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan 523808, China)

  • Yun Li

    (Industry 4.0 Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, School of Computer Science and Technology, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan 523808, China)

Abstract

Accurately forecasting a battery’s remaining useful life (RUL) plays an important role in the prognostics and health management of rechargeable batteries. An effective forecast is reported using a particle filter (PF), but it currently suffers from particle degeneracy and impoverishment deficiencies in RUL evaluations. In this paper, an inheritance PF is developed to predict lithium-ion battery RUL for the first time. A battery degradation model is first mapped onto a PF problem using the genetic algorithm (GA) framework. Then, a Lamarckian inheritance operator is designed to improve the light-weight particles by heavy-weight ones and thus to tackle particle degeneracy. In addition, the inheritance mechanism retains certain existing information to tackle particle impoverishment. The performance of the inheritance PF is compared with an elitism GA-based PF. The former has fewer tuning parameters than the latter and is less sensitive to tuning parameters. Both PFs are applied to the prediction of lithium-ion battery RUL, which is validated using capacity degradation data from the NASA Ames Research Center. The experimental results show that the inheritance PF method offers improved RUL prediction and wider applications. Further improvement is obtained with one-step ahead prediction when the charging and discharging cycles move along.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin Li & Alfredo Alan Flores Saldivar & Yun Bai & Yun Li, 2019. "Battery Remaining Useful Life Prediction with Inheritance Particle Filtering," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-18, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:14:p:2784-:d:249978
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/14/2784/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/14/2784/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zheng, Xiujuan & Fang, Huajing, 2015. "An integrated unscented kalman filter and relevance vector regression approach for lithium-ion battery remaining useful life and short-term capacity prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 74-82.
    2. Jinsong Yu & Baohua Mo & Diyin Tang & Jie Yang & Jiuqing Wan & Jingjing Liu, 2017. "Indirect State-of-Health Estimation for Lithium-Ion Batteries under Randomized Use," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Lingling Li & Pengchong Wang & Kuei-Hsiang Chao & Yatong Zhou & Yang Xie, 2016. "Remaining Useful Life Prediction for Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Gaussian Processes Mixture," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-13, September.
    4. M Dalal & J Ma & D He, 2011. "Lithium-ion battery life prognostic health management system using particle filtering framework," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 225(1), pages 81-90, March.
    5. Hu, Chao & Youn, Byeng D. & Chung, Jaesik, 2012. "A multiscale framework with extended Kalman filter for lithium-ion battery SOC and capacity estimation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 694-704.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qiangqiang Cheng & Yiqi Yan & Shichao Liu & Chunsheng Yang & Hicham Chaoui & Mohamad Alzayed, 2020. "Particle Filter-Based Electricity Load Prediction for Grid-Connected Microgrid Day-Ahead Scheduling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Wen, Pengfei & Zhao, Shuai & Chen, Shaowei & Li, Yong, 2021. "A generalized remaining useful life prediction method for complex systems based on composite health indicator," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    3. Ajaykumar Unagar & Yuan Tian & Manuel Arias Chao & Olga Fink, 2021. "Learning to Calibrate Battery Models in Real-Time with Deep Reinforcement Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-12, March.
    4. Zio, Enrico, 2022. "Prognostics and Health Management (PHM): Where are we and where do we (need to) go in theory and practice," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).
    5. Shaheer Ansari & Afida Ayob & Molla Shahadat Hossain Lipu & Aini Hussain & Mohamad Hanif Md Saad, 2021. "Multi-Channel Profile Based Artificial Neural Network Approach for Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Electric Vehicle Lithium-Ion Batteries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dai, Haifeng & Jiang, Bo & Hu, Xiaosong & Lin, Xianke & Wei, Xuezhe & Pecht, Michael, 2021. "Advanced battery management strategies for a sustainable energy future: Multilayer design concepts and research trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    2. Ding, Pan & Liu, Xiaojuan & Li, Huiqin & Huang, Zequan & Zhang, Ke & Shao, Long & Abedinia, Oveis, 2021. "Useful life prediction based on wavelet packet decomposition and two-dimensional convolutional neural network for lithium-ion batteries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    3. Jianxun Zhang & Xiao He & Xiaosheng Si & Changhua Hu & Donghua Zhou, 2017. "A Novel Multi-Phase Stochastic Model for Lithium-Ion Batteries’ Degradation with Regeneration Phenomena," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-24, October.
    4. Xiaodong Xu & Chuanqiang Yu & Shengjin Tang & Xiaoyan Sun & Xiaosheng Si & Lifeng Wu, 2019. "Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Wiener Processes with Considering the Relaxation Effect," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Tang, Ting & Yuan, Huimei, 2022. "A hybrid approach based on decomposition algorithm and neural network for remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion battery," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    6. Bai, Guangxing & Su, Yunsheng & Rahman, Maliha Maisha & Wang, Zequn, 2023. "Prognostics of Lithium-Ion batteries using knowledge-constrained machine learning and Kalman filtering," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    7. Wang, Yujie & Tian, Jiaqiang & Sun, Zhendong & Wang, Li & Xu, Ruilong & Li, Mince & Chen, Zonghai, 2020. "A comprehensive review of battery modeling and state estimation approaches for advanced battery management systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    8. Han, Xiaojuan & Wang, Zuran & Wei, Zixuan, 2021. "A novel approach for health management online-monitoring of lithium-ion batteries based on model-data fusion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    9. Li, Sai & Fang, Huajing & Shi, Bing, 2021. "Remaining useful life estimation of Lithium-ion battery based on interacting multiple model particle filter and support vector regression," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    10. Downey, Austin & Lui, Yu-Hui & Hu, Chao & Laflamme, Simon & Hu, Shan, 2019. "Physics-based prognostics of lithium-ion battery using non-linear least squares with dynamic bounds," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 1-12.
    11. Rauf, Huzaifa & Khalid, Muhammad & Arshad, Naveed, 2022. "Machine learning in state of health and remaining useful life estimation: Theoretical and technological development in battery degradation modelling," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    12. Zhengyu Liu & Jingjie Zhao & Hao Wang & Chao Yang, 2020. "A New Lithium-Ion Battery SOH Estimation Method Based on an Indirect Enhanced Health Indicator and Support Vector Regression in PHMs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    13. Qiaohua Fang & Xuezhe Wei & Tianyi Lu & Haifeng Dai & Jiangong Zhu, 2019. "A State of Health Estimation Method for Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Voltage Relaxation Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    14. Maya Santhira Sekeran & Milan Živadinović & Myra Spiliopoulou, 2022. "Transferability of a Battery Cell End-of-Life Prediction Model Using Survival Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.
    15. Wei, Jingwen & Chen, Chunlin, 2021. "A multi-timescale framework for state monitoring and lifetime prognosis of lithium-ion batteries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    16. Cai, Yishan & Yang, Lin & Deng, Zhongwei & Zhao, Xiaowei & Deng, Hao, 2018. "Online identification of lithium-ion battery state-of-health based on fast wavelet transform and cross D-Markov machine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 621-635.
    17. Sun, Li & Sun, Wen & You, Fengqi, 2020. "Core temperature modelling and monitoring of lithium-ion battery in the presence of sensor bias," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    18. Li, Yi & Liu, Kailong & Foley, Aoife M. & Zülke, Alana & Berecibar, Maitane & Nanini-Maury, Elise & Van Mierlo, Joeri & Hoster, Harry E., 2019. "Data-driven health estimation and lifetime prediction of lithium-ion batteries: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    19. Zhang, Yajun & Liu, Yajie & Wang, Jia & Zhang, Tao, 2022. "State-of-health estimation for lithium-ion batteries by combining model-based incremental capacity analysis with support vector regression," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    20. E. Skordilis & R. Moghaddass, 2017. "A condition monitoring approach for real-time monitoring of degrading systems using Kalman filter and logistic regression," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(19), pages 5579-5596, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:14:p:2784-:d:249978. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.