IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i12p3476-d190230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Cassava Starch with Corn as a Feedstock for Bioethanol Production

Author

Listed:
  • Sarocha Pradyawong

    (Department of Food Engineering and Bioprocess Technology, Asian Institute of Technology, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand)

  • Ankita Juneja

    (Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA)

  • Muhammad Bilal Sadiq

    (Department of Food Engineering and Bioprocess Technology, Asian Institute of Technology, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand)

  • Athapol Noomhorm

    (Department of Food Engineering and Bioprocess Technology, Asian Institute of Technology, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand)

  • Vijay Singh

    (Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA)

Abstract

Cassava is a high potential feedstock for bioethanol production in Asian countries, primarily due to high yield of carbohydrate per unit land, and its ability to grow on marginal lands with minimal agrochemical requirements. The objective of this study was to compare the bioethanol production from cassava starch with corn starch using a conventional and a raw/granular starch hydrolyzing process (GSH). The fermentation performance of cassava starch was compared with three corn starch types with different amylose: Amylopectin ratios. The final ethanol concentration with cassava starch was similar to that of two corn starch types, dent corn and waxy corn for both processes. For the cassava starch, the ethanol concentration achieved with GSH process was 2.8% higher than that in the conventional process. Cassava starch yielded the highest fermentation rates of the four starches investigated, during the conventional process. Ethanol production and fermentation profiles comparable with corn, a widely used feedstock, makes cassava starch an attractive substrate for bioethanol production.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarocha Pradyawong & Ankita Juneja & Muhammad Bilal Sadiq & Athapol Noomhorm & Vijay Singh, 2018. "Comparison of Cassava Starch with Corn as a Feedstock for Bioethanol Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-11, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:12:p:3476-:d:190230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/12/3476/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/12/3476/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdi Hanra Sebayang & Masjuki Haji Hassan & Hwai Chyuan Ong & Surya Dharma & Arridina Susan Silitonga & Fitranto Kusumo & Teuku Meurah Indra Mahlia & Aditiya Harjon Bahar, 2017. "Optimization of Reducing Sugar Production from Manihot glaziovii Starch Using Response Surface Methodology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Edgar Olguin-Maciel & Alfonso Larqué-Saavedra & Daisy Pérez-Brito & Luis F. Barahona-Pérez & Liliana Alzate-Gaviria & Tanit Toledano-Thompson & Patricia E. Lappe-Oliveras & Emy G. Huchin-Poot & Raúl T, 2017. "Brosimum Alicastrum as a Novel Starch Source for Bioethanol Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-10, October.
    3. Okudoh, Vincent & Trois, Cristina & Workneh, Tilahun & Schmidt, Stefan, 2014. "The potential of cassava biomass and applicable technologies for sustainable biogas production in South Africa: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 1035-1052.
    4. Chinmay V. Kurambhatti & Deepak Kumar & Kent D. Rausch & Mike E. Tumbleson & Vijay Singh, 2018. "Ethanol Production from Corn Fiber Separated after Liquefaction in the Dry Grind Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-12, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rezania, Shahabaldin & Oryani, Bahareh & Cho, Jinwoo & Talaiekhozani, Amirreza & Sabbagh, Farzaneh & Hashemi, Beshare & Rupani, Parveen Fatemeh & Mohammadi, Ali Akbar, 2020. "Different pretreatment technologies of lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol production: An overview," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    2. Nicoletta Gronchi & Lorenzo Favaro & Lorenzo Cagnin & Silvia Brojanigo & Valentino Pizzocchero & Marina Basaglia & Sergio Casella, 2019. "Novel Yeast Strains for the Efficient Saccharification and Fermentation of Starchy By-Products to Bioethanol," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Shiferaw Feleke & Steven Michael Cole & Haruna Sekabira & Rousseau Djouaka & Victor Manyong, 2021. "Circular Bioeconomy Research for Development in Sub-Saharan Africa: Innovations, Gaps, and Actions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Pinto, T. & Flores-Alsina, X. & Gernaey, K.V. & Junicke, H., 2021. "Alone or together? A review on pure and mixed microbial cultures for butanol production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhen, Guangyin & Lu, Xueqin & Kato, Hiroyuki & Zhao, Youcai & Li, Yu-You, 2017. "Overview of pretreatment strategies for enhancing sewage sludge disintegration and subsequent anaerobic digestion: Current advances, full-scale application and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 559-577.
    2. Baruah, Debendra Chandra & Enweremadu, Christopher Chintua, 2019. "Prospects of decentralized renewable energy to improve energy access: A resource-inventory-based analysis of South Africa," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 328-341.
    3. Ko, Ja Kyong & Lee, Jae Hoon & Jung, Je Hyeong & Lee, Sun-Mi, 2020. "Recent advances and future directions in plant and yeast engineering to improve lignocellulosic biofuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Rafał Łukajtis & Piotr Rybarczyk & Karolina Kucharska & Donata Konopacka-Łyskawa & Edyta Słupek & Katarzyna Wychodnik & Marian Kamiński, 2018. "Optimization of Saccharification Conditions of Lignocellulosic Biomass under Alkaline Pre-Treatment and Enzymatic Hydrolysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-27, April.
    5. Ozoegwu, C.G. & Eze, C. & Onwosi, C.O. & Mgbemene, C.A. & Ozor, P.A., 2017. "Biomass and bioenergy potential of cassava waste in Nigeria: Estimations based partly on rural-level garri processing case studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 625-638.
    6. Giwa, Adewale & Alabi, Adetunji & Yusuf, Ahmed & Olukan, Tuza, 2017. "A comprehensive review on biomass and solar energy for sustainable energy generation in Nigeria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 620-641.
    7. Kyriakou, Maria & Patsalou, Maria & Xiaris, Nikolas & Tsevis, Athanasios & Koutsokeras, Loukas & Constantinides, Georgios & Koutinas, Michalis, 2020. "Enhancing bioproduction and thermotolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae via cell immobilization on biochar: Application in a citrus peel waste biorefinery," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 53-64.
    8. Francisco Anguebes-Franseschi & Mohamed Abatal & Ali Bassam & Mauricio A. Escalante Soberanis & Oscar May Tzuc & Lauro Bucio-Galindo & Atl Victor Cordova Quiroz & Claudia Alejandra Aguilar Ucan & Migu, 2018. "Esterification Optimization of Crude African Palm Olein Using Response Surface Methodology and Heterogeneous Acid Catalysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, January.
    9. Qi Zhang & Zhenzhen Shi & Pengfei Zhang & Meng Zhang & Zhichao Li & Xi Chen & Jiping Zhou, 2018. "Ultrasonic-Assisted Pelleting of Sorghum Stalk: Predictive Models for Pellet Density and Durability Using Multiple Response Surface Methodology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, May.
    10. Divya, D. & Gopinath, L.R. & Merlin Christy, P., 2015. "A review on current aspects and diverse prospects for enhancing biogas production in sustainable means," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 690-699.
    11. Padi, Richard Kingsley & Chimphango, Annie, 2021. "Assessing the potential of integrating cassava residues-based bioenergy into national energy mix using long-range Energy Alternatives Planning systems approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    12. Obianuju P. Ilo & Mulala D. Simatele & S’phumelele L. Nkomo & Ntandoyenkosi M. Mkhize & Nagendra G. Prabhu, 2020. "The Benefits of Water Hyacinth ( Eichhornia crassipes ) for Southern Africa: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, November.
    13. Zhang, Tingting & Xie, Xiaomin & Huang, Zhen, 2017. "The policy recommendations on cassava ethanol in China: Analyzed from the perspective of life cycle “2E&W”," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 12-24.
    14. Sánchez, Antonio Santos & Silva, Yuri Lopes & Kalid, Ricardo Araújo & Cohim, Eduardo & Torres, Ednildo Andrade, 2017. "Waste bio-refineries for the cassava starch industry: New trends and review of alternatives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1265-1275.
    15. Li, Jun & Zhao, Renyong & Xu, Youjie & Wu, Xiaorong & Bean, Scott R. & Wang, Donghai, 2022. "Fuel ethanol production from starchy grain and other crops: An overview on feedstocks, affecting factors, and technical advances," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 223-239.
    16. Yusuf, Abdulfatah Abdu & Inambao, Freddie L., 2020. "Characterization of Ugandan biomass wastes as the potential candidates towards bioenergy production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    17. Jozef Martinka & Peter Rantuch & Igor Wachter, 2019. "Impact of Water Content on Energy Potential and Combustion Characteristics of Methanol and Ethanol Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-16, September.
    18. Chohan, Naseeha A. & Aruwajoye, G.S. & Sewsynker-Sukai, Y. & Gueguim Kana, E.B., 2020. "Valorisation of potato peel wastes for bioethanol production using simultaneous saccharification and fermentation: Process optimization and kinetic assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1031-1040.
    19. Roopnarain, Ashira & Adeleke, Rasheed, 2017. "Current status, hurdles and future prospects of biogas digestion technology in Africa," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1162-1179.
    20. Arielle Muniz Kubota & João Guilherme Dal Belo Leite & Marcos Watanabe & Otávio Cavalett & Manoel Regis Lima Verde Leal & Luis Cortez, 2017. "The Role of Small-Scale Biofuel Production in Brazil: Lessons for Developing Countries," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-12, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:12:p:3476-:d:190230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.