IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i11p2991-d179886.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biochemical Conversion and Microbial Community in Response to Ternary pH Buffer System during Anaerobic Digestion of Swine Manure

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoshan Meng

    (School of Chemical & Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
    State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China)

  • Yuxiu Zhang

    (School of Chemical & Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Qianwen Sui

    (State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
    Department of Water Pollution Control Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China)

  • Junya Zhang

    (State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
    Department of Water Pollution Control Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China)

  • Rui Wang

    (State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
    Department of Water Pollution Control Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China)

  • Dawei Yu

    (State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
    Department of Water Pollution Control Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China)

  • Yawei Wang

    (State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
    Department of Water Pollution Control Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China)

  • Yuansong Wei

    (State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
    Department of Water Pollution Control Technology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
    College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

Abstract

The ternary pH buffer system with ammonia-carbonates-volatile fatty acids (VFAs) is essential to anaerobes for bioenergy recovery via anaerobic digestion (AD). However, ammonia and VFAs are recognized as potential inhibitors that depress methanogenesis. In this study, biochemical conversion and the microbial community in batch AD at total solid (TS) from 4% to 14% were investigated to reveal their response to the ternary pH buffer system. The rapid ammonia release, probably promoted by Anaerosphaera and Eubacterium inferred from the concurrent peak of their relative abundance, triggered total ammonia (TAN) inhibition with the accumulation of VFAs in the start-up stage of high solid AD (HSAD, TS ≥ 8%). Along with evolution of the microbial community to resist high TAN and VFAs, methanogenesis recovered with improved degradation of VFAs and reduction of COD. When exposed to 3500 mg·N·L −1 TAN at 8% TS, aceticlastic Methanosarcina became dominant first and then together with hydrogenotrophic Methanoculleus , achieved the optimal biochemical conversion. While in HSAD at 11–14% TS, the main pathway of methanogenesis appeared to have shifted from the aceticlastic pathway to the hydrogenotrophic pathway, as inferred by changes in the relative abundance of methanogens, and this could have been induced by the increasing concentration of high free ammonia (FAN, ≥588 mg·N·L −1 ). Although the anaerobes had acclimatized to high TAN, the propionate-oxidizing bacteria and acetate-oxidizing bacteria might have again been inhibited by high FAN, frustrating the H 2 supply for FAN-tolerant Methanoculleus and causing an 8.2–11.3% depression of COD reduction (mainly propionate residual).

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoshan Meng & Yuxiu Zhang & Qianwen Sui & Junya Zhang & Rui Wang & Dawei Yu & Yawei Wang & Yuansong Wei, 2018. "Biochemical Conversion and Microbial Community in Response to Ternary pH Buffer System during Anaerobic Digestion of Swine Manure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:11:p:2991-:d:179886
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/11/2991/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/11/2991/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander Keucken & Moshe Habagil & Damien Batstone & Ulf Jeppsson & Magnus Arnell, 2018. "Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Sludge and Organic Food Waste—Performance, Inhibition, and Impact on the Microbial Community," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Na Duan & Xia Ran & Ruirui Li & Panagiotis G. Kougias & Yuanhui Zhang & Cong Lin & Hongbin Liu, 2018. "Performance Evaluation of Mesophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure with Algal Digestate," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-11, July.
    3. Yuan, Haiping & Zhu, Nanwen, 2016. "Progress in inhibition mechanisms and process control of intermediates and by-products in sewage sludge anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 429-438.
    4. Fuchs, Werner & Wang, Xuemei & Gabauer, Wolfgang & Ortner, Markus & Li, Zifu, 2018. "Tackling ammonia inhibition for efficient biogas production from chicken manure: Status and technical trends in Europe and China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 186-199.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ievgeniia Morozova & Nadiia Nikulina & Hans Oechsner & Johannes Krümpel & Andreas Lemmer, 2020. "Effects of Increasing Nitrogen Content on Process Stability and Reactor Performance in Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Juhee Shin & Si-Kyung Cho & Joonyeob Lee & Kwanghyun Hwang & Jae Woo Chung & Hae-Nam Jang & Seung Gu Shin, 2019. "Performance and Microbial Community Dynamics in Anaerobic Digestion of Waste Activated Sludge: Impact of Immigration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Susanne Theuerl & Johanna Klang & Annette Prochnow, 2019. "Process Disturbances in Agricultural Biogas Production—Causes, Mechanisms and Effects on the Biogas Microbiome: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arora, Amarpreet Singh & Nawaz, Alam & Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Ismail, Sherif & Aslam, Muhammad & Tawfik, Ahmed & Yun, Choa Mun & Lee, Moonyong, 2021. "Energy saving anammox technology-based nitrogen removal and bioenergy recovery from wastewater: Inhibition mechanisms, state-of-the-art control strategies, and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    2. Yellezuome, Dominic & Zhu, Xianpu & Wang, Zengzhen & Liu, Ronghou, 2022. "Mitigation of ammonia inhibition in anaerobic digestion of nitrogen-rich substrates for biogas production by ammonia stripping: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    3. Bi, Shaojie & Westerholm, Maria & Hu, Wanrong & Mahdy, Ahmed & Dong, Taili & Sun, Yingcai & Qiao, Wei & Dong, Renjie, 2021. "The metabolic performance and microbial communities of anaerobic digestion of chicken manure under stressed ammonia condition: A case study of a 10-year successful biogas plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 644-651.
    4. Ao, Tianjie & Chen, Lin & Chen, Yichao & Liu, Xiaofeng & Wan, Liping & Li, Dong, 2021. "The screening of early warning indicators and microbial community of chicken manure thermophilic digestion at high organic loading rate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    5. El Ibrahimi, Mohammed & Khay, Ismail & El Maakoul, Anas & Bakhouya, Mohamed, 2022. "Effects of the temperature range on the energy performance of mixed and unmixed digesters with submerged waste: An experimental and CFD simulation study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1092-1104.
    6. Garcia, Natalia Herrero & Mattioli, Andrea & Gil, Aida & Frison, Nicola & Battista, Federico & Bolzonella, David, 2019. "Evaluation of the methane potential of different agricultural and food processing substrates for improved biogas production in rural areas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 1-10.
    7. Adele Folino & Demetrio Antonio Zema & Paolo S. Calabrò, 2020. "Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Swine Wastewater Treatments Using Ammonia Stripping and Anaerobic Digestion: A Short Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-28, June.
    8. Kumar, Atul & Samadder, S.R., 2020. "Performance evaluation of anaerobic digestion technology for energy recovery from organic fraction of municipal solid waste: A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    9. Wu, Di & Li, Lei & Peng, Yun & Yang, Pingjin & Peng, Xuya & Sun, Yongming & Wang, Xiaoming, 2021. "State indicators of anaerobic digestion: A critical review on process monitoring and diagnosis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    10. Margarita Andreas Dareioti & Aikaterini Ioannis Vavouraki & Konstantina Tsigkou & Michael Kornaros, 2021. "Assessment of Single- vs. Two-Stage Process for the Anaerobic Digestion of Liquid Cow Manure and Cheese Whey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, August.
    11. Susanne Theuerl & Christiane Herrmann & Monika Heiermann & Philipp Grundmann & Niels Landwehr & Ulrich Kreidenweis & Annette Prochnow, 2019. "The Future Agricultural Biogas Plant in Germany: A Vision," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-32, January.
    12. Di Capua, Francesco & Spasiano, Danilo & Giordano, Andrea & Adani, Fabrizio & Fratino, Umberto & Pirozzi, Francesco & Esposito, Giovanni, 2020. "High-solid anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge: challenges and opportunities," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    13. Jara Laso & Isabel García-Herrero & María Margallo & Alba Bala & Pere Fullana-i-Palmer & Angel Irabien & Rubén Aldaco, 2019. "LCA-Based Comparison of Two Organic Fraction Municipal Solid Waste Collection Systems in Historical Centres in Spain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, April.
    14. D’ Silva, Tinku Casper & Isha, Adya & Chandra, Ram & Vijay, Virendra Kumar & Subbarao, Paruchuri Mohan V. & Kumar, Ritunesh & Chaudhary, Ved Prakash & Singh, Harjit & Khan, Abid Ali & Tyagi, Vinay Kum, 2021. "Enhancing methane production in anaerobic digestion through hydrogen assisted pathways – A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    15. Nicola Di Costanzo & Alessandra Cesaro & Francesco Di Capua & Giovanni Esposito, 2021. "Exploiting the Nutrient Potential of Anaerobically Digested Sewage Sludge: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-25, December.
    16. Spyridon Achinas & Johan Horjus & Vasileios Achinas & Gerrit Jan Willem Euverink, 2019. "A PESTLE Analysis of Biofuels Energy Industry in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, October.
    17. Sedighi, Afsane & Karrabi, Mohsen & Shahnavaz, Bahar & Mostafavinezhad, Morteza, 2022. "Bioenergy production from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and sewage sludge using mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion: An experimental and kinetic modeling study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    18. Shabib, Ahmad & Abdallah, Mohamed & Shanableh, Abdallah & Sartaj, Majid, 2022. "Effect of substrates and voltages on the performance of bio-electrochemical anaerobic digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 16-27.
    19. Elalami, D. & Carrere, H. & Monlau, F. & Abdelouahdi, K. & Oukarroum, A. & Barakat, A., 2019. "Pretreatment and co-digestion of wastewater sludge for biogas production: Recent research advances and trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    20. Xue, Shengrong & Song, Jinghui & Wang, Xiaojiao & Shang, Zezhou & Sheng, Chenjing & Li, Chongyuan & Zhu, Yufan & Liu, Jingyu, 2020. "A systematic comparison of biogas development and related policies between China and Europe and corresponding insights," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:11:p:2991-:d:179886. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.