IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecnmx/v13y2025i1p4-d1568377.html

An Economic Theory with a Formal-Econometric Test of Its Empirical Relevance

Author

Listed:
  • Bernt Petter Stigum

    (Department of Economics, The University of Oslo, Pb. 1095 Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway)

Abstract

The paper contains five parts—a theory about entrepreneurial choice under uncertainty, a formal econometric structure for a test, the test, an appraisal of the test, and a description of the data generating process. Here, an entrepreneur is an individual who manages a firm that produces one commodity with labor, an intermediate good, and capital. He pays dividends to shareholders, invests in bonds and capital, and has an n -period planning horizon. Conditioned on the values of current-period prices, the entrepreneur aims to maximize the expected value of a utility function that varies with the dividends he pays each period and with his firm’s balance sheet variables at the end of the planning horizon. The test comprises a family of trials of theorems that I derive from the axioms of the theory part of the formal econometric structure. In the test, the theorems are appraised for their empirical relevance in an empirical context, where each one of a random sample of four hundred entrepreneurs has chosen the first-period part of his optimal n -period expenditure plan. My formal econometric arguments demonstrate that the theorems pass all the trials. At the end, I show that my formal econometric results imply that the theory is empirically relevant.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernt Petter Stigum, 2025. "An Economic Theory with a Formal-Econometric Test of Its Empirical Relevance," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecnmx:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:4-:d:1568377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1146/13/1/4/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2225-1146/13/1/4/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. BARTEN, Anton P., 1969. "Maximum likelihood estimation of a complete system of demand equations," LIDAM Reprints CORE 34, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    2. Barten, A. P., 1969. "Maximum likelihood estimation of a complete system of demand equations," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 7-73.
    3. Christophe Bontemps & Grayham E. Mizon, 2008. "Encompassing: Concepts and Implementation," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 70(s1), pages 721-750, December.
    4. Bernt P. Stigum, 1969. "Competitive Equilibria under Uncertainty," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 83(4), pages 533-561.
    5. Bernt P. Stigum, 2016. "The Status of Bridge Principles in Applied Econometrics," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Deaton, Angus S & Muellbauer, John, 1980. "An Almost Ideal Demand System," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(3), pages 312-326, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bernt P. Stigum, 2021. "Consumer Choice under Certainty and Uncertainty in Applied Econometrics," EERI Research Paper Series EERI RP 2021/08, Economics and Econometrics Research Institute (EERI), Brussels.
    2. Barnett, William A. & Serletis, Apostolos, 2008. "Consumer preferences and demand systems," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 147(2), pages 210-224, December.
    3. Keuzenkamp, Hugo A. & Barten, Anton P., 1995. "Rejection without falsification on the history of testing the homogeneity condition in the theory of consumer demand," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 103-127, May.
    4. James L. Seale & Mary A. Marchant & Alberto Basso, 2003. "Imports versus Domestic Production: A Demand System Analysis of the U.S. Red Wine Market," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 25(1), pages 187-202.
    5. Barnett, William A. & Serletis, Apostolos, 2008. "The Differential Approach to Demand Analysis and the Rotterdam Model," MPRA Paper 12319, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Paris, Quirino & Caracciolo, Francesco, 2012. "Quantity Versus Shares in Estimating Demand Systems," Working Papers 124575, University of California, Davis, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    7. Korir, Lilian & Rizov, Marian & Ruto, Eric, 2020. "Food security in Kenya: Insights from a household food demand model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 99-108.
    8. Seale, James L. & Solano, Alexis A., 2012. "The changing demand for energy in rich and poor countries over 25years," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1834-1844.
    9. Wisdom Akpalu & Michael Adu Okyere, 2023. "Fish Protein Transition in a Coastal Developing Country," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 84(3), pages 825-843, March.
    10. Holt, Matthew T., 2002. "Inverse demand systems and choice of functional form," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 117-142, January.
    11. Mateo Velásquez‐Giraldo & Gustavo Canavire‐Bacarreza & Kim P. Huynh & David T. Jacho‐Chavez, 2018. "Flexible Estimation of Demand Systems: A Copula Approach," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(7), pages 1109-1116, November.
    12. van Heeswijk, B J & de Boer, P M C & Harkema, R, 1993. "A Dynamic Specification of an AIDS Import Allocation Model," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 57-73.
    13. W D A Bryant, 2009. "General Equilibrium:Theory and Evidence," World Scientific Books, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., number 6875, September.
    14. repec:osf:socarx:cn7am_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Rodrigo García Arancibia & Edith Depetris Guiguet, 2020. "Brazilian Import Demand of Dairy Products with Emphasis in the Mercosul Context [Demanda brasileira de importações de laticínios com ênfase no contexo do Mercosul]," Nova Economia, Economics Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Brazil), vol. 30(2), pages 551-577, May-Augus.
    16. Paris, Quirino & Caracciolo, Francesco, "undated". "Testing the Adding Up Condition in Demand Systems," Working Papers 171748, University of California, Davis, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    17. William A. Barnett & Isaac Kalonda Kanyama, 2013. "Time-varying parameters in the almost ideal demand system and the Rotterdam model: will the best specification please stand up?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(29), pages 4169-4183, October.
    18. Yadavalli, Anita & Jones, Keithly, 2014. "Does media influence consumer demand? The case of lean finely textured beef in the United States," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(P1), pages 219-227.
    19. Serletis, Apostolos & Xu, Libo, 2020. "Functional monetary aggregates, monetary policy, and business cycles," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    20. Ariane Kehlbacher & Richard Tiffin & Adam Briggs & Mike Berners-Lee & Peter Scarborough, 2016. "The distributional and nutritional impacts and mitigation potential of emission-based food taxes in the UK," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 121-141, July.
    21. Braha, Kushtrim & Cupak, Andrej & Qineti, Artan & Pokrivcak, Jan, "undated". "Food Demand System in Transition Economies: Evidence from Kosovo," 162nd Seminar, April 26-27, 2018, Budapest, Hungary 272050, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecnmx:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:4-:d:1568377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.