IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jdisab/v2y2022i1p12-163d771457.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

"I Just Stay in the House So I Don't Need to Explain": A Qualitative Investigation of Persons with Invisible Disabilities

Author

Listed:
  • Gillian Hendry

    (School of Education and Social Sciences, Paisley Campus, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley PA1 2BE, UK)

  • Claire Wilson

    (School of Education, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK)

  • Mairi Orr

    (School of Education and Social Sciences, Paisley Campus, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley PA1 2BE, UK)

  • Rebecca Scullion

    (School of Education and Social Sciences, Paisley Campus, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley PA1 2BE, UK)

Abstract

Research has shown that persons with disabilities continually face discrimination. More research attention has focused on individuals’ experiences of visible disability, despite evidence that there are higher numbers worldwide of people with invisible disabilities. As such, persons with invisible disabilities can feel under-represented in disability literature. A qualitative study was conducted to address this. Twenty-five persons with an invisible disability were recruited to take part in focus groups and interviews aimed at understanding the lived experience of invisible disability on social life and within the workplace. Data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis, identifying themes of (1) Incongruity between looking and feeling, (2) The impact of others, (3), Adaptation, (4) Talking about disability, (5) (Un)supported and (un)accepted, and (6) Discrimination/legislation. The findings indicate that the language, attitudes and behaviour of others are important to support inclusion in the social and working lives of those with invisible disabilities. Persons without a disability should be willing to talk about disability, see the strengths of those with an invisible disability and be mindful of language used around visibility. Suggestions relating to what we can do to be better support those with an invisible disability in society are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Gillian Hendry & Claire Wilson & Mairi Orr & Rebecca Scullion, 2022. ""I Just Stay in the House So I Don't Need to Explain": A Qualitative Investigation of Persons with Invisible Disabilities," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jdisab:v:2:y:2022:i:1:p:12-163:d:771457
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7272/2/1/12/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7272/2/1/12/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kendall Goodrich & Rosemary Ramsey, 2013. "Do people with disabilities feel excluded? Comparision of learning and physical disabilities," Journal of Community Positive Practices, Catalactica NGO, issue 3, pages 74-87.
    2. Santuzzi, Alecia M. & Waltz, Pamela R. & Finkelstein, Lisa M. & Rupp, Deborah E., 2014. "Invisible Disabilities: Unique Challenges for Employees and Organizations," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 204-219, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lavanya Vijayasingham & Uma Jogulu & Pascale Allotey, 2018. "Enriching the Organizational Context of Chronic Illness Experience Through an Ethics of Care Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 29-40, November.
    2. Nancy Elizabeth Doyle & Almuth McDowall & Raymond Randall & Kate Knight, 2022. "Does it work? Using a Meta-Impact score to examine global effects in quasi-experimental intervention studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Nigel Golden & Kadambari Devarajan & Cathleen Balantic & Joseph Drake & Michael T Hallworth & Toni Lyn Morelli, 2021. "Ten simple rules for productive lab meetings," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(5), pages 1-13, May.
    4. Edna Rabenu & Aharon Tziner, 2016. "Selection of Employees with Disabilities – Has the Burden on the Employer Become too Heavy?," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 18(42), pages 423-423, May.
    5. Nancy Elizabeth Doyle & Almuth McDowall, 2019. "Context matters: A review to formulate a conceptual framework for coaching as a disability accommodation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-30, August.
    6. Shae Wissell & Leila Karimi & Tanya Serry & Lisa Furlong & Judith Hudson, 2022. "Leading Diverse Workforces: Perspectives from Managers and Employers about Dyslexic Employees in Australian Workplaces," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, September.
    7. Ernest Nkansah‐Dwamena, 2022. "How can we create a diverse, equitable and inclusive workplace in society without the voice of disability? Lessons from Ghana," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(5), pages 1028-1047, July.
    8. Damien Aimar & Jean-François Chanlat, 2018. "The environment for managing invisible handicap in France: A case study of dyslexic workers’ idiosyncratic skills," Post-Print hal-01894839, HAL.
    9. Sarah Richard & Sophie Hennekam, 2020. "When Can a Disability Quota System Empower Disabled Individuals in the Workplace? The Case of France," Post-Print hal-03232751, HAL.
    10. Shae Wissell & Leila Karimi & Tanya Serry & Lisa Furlong & Judith Hudson, 2022. "“You Don’t Look Dyslexic”: Using the Job Demands—Resource Model of Burnout to Explore Employment Experiences of Australian Adults with Dyslexia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-20, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdisab:v:2:y:2022:i:1:p:12-163:d:771457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.