IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jdisab/v1y2021i3p16-217d607268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strengthening the Participation of Organisations of Persons with Disabilities in the Decision-Making of National Government and the United Nations: Further Analyses of the International Disability Alliance Global Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Joanne McVeigh

    (Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, W23 F2K8 Maynooth, Ireland
    Assisting Living and Learning (ALL) Institute, Maynooth University, W23 F2K8 Maynooth, Ireland)

  • Malcolm MacLachlan

    (Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, W23 F2K8 Maynooth, Ireland
    Assisting Living and Learning (ALL) Institute, Maynooth University, W23 F2K8 Maynooth, Ireland
    Olomouc University Social Health Institute (OUSHI), Palacký University, 77900 Olomouc, Czech Republic
    National Clinical Programme for People with Disabilities, Health Service Executive, Dublin 8, Ireland)

  • Delia Ferri

    (Assisting Living and Learning (ALL) Institute, Maynooth University, W23 F2K8 Maynooth, Ireland
    Department of Law, Maynooth University, W23 F2K8 Maynooth, Ireland
    Centre for European and Eurasian Studies, Maynooth University, W23 F2K8 Maynooth, Ireland)

  • Hasheem Mannan

    (School of Nursing, Midwifery, and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
    School of Liberal Education, Flame University, Pune 412115, India)

Abstract

The participation of organisations of persons with disabilities (OPDs) is crucial at each stage of policy processes at the local, regional, and international levels. However, decision-making mechanisms have traditionally excluded OPDs, failing to consult with them on decisions that impact on their daily lives. The overall aim of this study was to examine the participation of persons with disabilities and OPDs in development programmes and policies by exploring recommendations from a sample of OPDs on ways to strengthen their participation with government and the UN. Secondary data analysis was conducted using a global survey on the participation of OPDs, administered by the International Disability Alliance to OPD representatives. Two open-ended items were analysed, which explored participants’ recommendations on ways to strengthen their participation with government and the UN. Data were analysed using the descriptive and interpretive qualitative methods. Respondents provided recommendations on how to strengthen their participation with their national government and the UN, focusing on several issues including accessibility, human rights, and the need for inclusion of all OPDs and all groups of persons with disabilities. The synergy between the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Sustainable Development Goals presents opportunities for OPDs to increase their participation in development policies and programmes. It is vital, however, to dismantle the barriers to participation in decision-making by OPDs and persons with disabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanne McVeigh & Malcolm MacLachlan & Delia Ferri & Hasheem Mannan, 2021. "Strengthening the Participation of Organisations of Persons with Disabilities in the Decision-Making of National Government and the United Nations: Further Analyses of the International Disability All," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jdisab:v:1:y:2021:i:3:p:16-217:d:607268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7272/1/3/16/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7272/1/3/16/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laufey Löve & Rannveig Traustadóttir & Gerard Quinn & James Rice, 2017. "The Inclusion of the Lived Experience of Disability in Policymaking," Laws, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Raymond Lang & Marguerite Schneider & Maria Kett & Ellie Cole & Nora Groce, 2019. "Policy development: An analysis of disability inclusion in a selection of African Union policies," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 37(2), pages 155-175, March.
    3. Malcolm MacLachlan & Hasheem Mannan, 2013. "Is Disability a Health Problem?," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(2), pages 139-141.
    4. Bert Fraussen & Adrià Albareda & Caelesta Braun, 2020. "Conceptualizing consultation approaches: identifying combinations of consultation tools and analyzing their implications for stakeholder diversity," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(3), pages 473-493, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simon Fink & Eva Ruffing & Tobias Burst & Sara Katharina Chinnow, 2023. "Emotional citizens, detached interest groups? The use of emotional language in public policy consultations," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(3), pages 469-497, September.
    2. Joost Berkhout & Jan Beyers & Marcel Hanegraaff, 2023. "The Representative Potential of Interest Groups: Internal Voice in Post-Communist and Western European Countries," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(1), pages 50-64.
    3. Simplice A. Asongu & Samba Diop & Amsalu K. Addis, 2023. "Governance, Inequality and Inclusive Education in Sub-Saharan Africa," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(1), pages 43-68, January.
    4. Asongu, Simplice A. & Orim, Stella-Maris I. & Nting, Rexon T., 2019. "Inequality, information technology and inclusive education in sub-Saharan Africa," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 380-389.
    5. David Coen & Alexander Katsaitis, 2021. "Lobbying Brexit Negotiations: Who Lobbies Michel Barnier?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(1), pages 37-47.
    6. Nguyen, Sun V. & Langston, Nancy & Wellstead, Adam & Howlett, Michael, 2020. "Mining the evidence: Public comments and evidence-based policymaking in the controversial Minnesota PolyMet mining project," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    7. Hanna Björg Sigurjónsdóttir & James Gordon Rice, 2023. "“Alleged Disabilities”: The Evolving Tactics of Child Protection in a Disability Rights Environment," Laws, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, March.
    8. Brydie Clarke & Janelle Kwon & Boyd Swinburn & Gary Sacks, 2021. "Understanding the dynamics of obesity prevention policy decision-making using a systems perspective: A case study of Healthy Together Victoria," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, January.
    9. Yeboah, Samuel, 2023. "Balancing Growth and Green: Strategies for Sustainable Development in Developing Economies," MPRA Paper 118180, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 20 Jun 2023.
    10. Adrià Albareda & Caelesta Braun & Bert Fraussen, 2023. "Explaining why public officials perceive interest groups as influential: on the role of policy capacities and policy insiderness," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(2), pages 191-209, June.
    11. Laufey Löve & Rannveig Traustadóttir & James Rice, 2019. "Shifting the Balance of Power: The Strategic Use of the CRPD by Disabled People’s Organizations in Securing ‘a Seat at the Table’," Laws, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, May.
    12. Richard Lombard-Vance & Evelyn Soye & Delia Ferri & Emma McEvoy & Malcolm MacLachlan & Sari Sarlio-Siintola, 2023. "Applying the ‘Human Rights Model of Disability’ to Informed Consent: Experiences and Reflections from the SHAPES Project," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-20, January.
    13. Guix, Mireia & Font, Xavier, 2022. "Consulting on the European Union's 2050 tourism policies: An appreciative inquiry materiality assessment," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdisab:v:1:y:2021:i:3:p:16-217:d:607268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.