IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jchals/v13y2022i2p53-d950716.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient Methane Production from Anaerobic Digestion of Cow Dung: An Optimization Approach

Author

Listed:
  • KeChrist Obileke

    (Department of Physics, Renewable Energy Research Centre, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice 5700, South Africa
    Fort Hare Institute of Technology, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice 5700, South Africa)

  • Golden Makaka

    (Department of Physics, Renewable Energy Research Centre, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice 5700, South Africa)

  • Nwabunwanne Nwokolo

    (Department of Physics, Renewable Energy Research Centre, University of Fort Hare, Private Bag X1314, Alice 5700, South Africa)

Abstract

In the context of addressing the global challenge of facilitating a decision-making process based on methane production using a predictive model, the study seeks to evaluate the performance of a biogas digester in varying operating conditions for optimization purposes. One of the techniques for doing this is the application of constrained linear least-square optimization. This has been employed to optimize the input parameter with the corresponding measured desired response. The developed model was built from 430 measured data set points of all the predictors over an 18-day monitoring period with an interval of 30 min. The result showed that the difference between the optimized model and the general model output for methane production in the biogas digester was less than 4%. Hence, the performance of the model demonstrated a strong validity as the determination coefficient (R 2 ) between the modeled, and optimized output was 0.968 for the volume of methane produced in the biogas digester. The obtained determination coefficient of the developed and optimized model suggests that the modeled value of the methane fits well with the measured value of methane for validation. Thus, from the test dataset, the optimized and modeled methane volume was reported as 28%. In this scenario, under the various operational parameters, an increase of 26.5% in methane was obtained when comparing the maximum volume of methane from the optimization process with the maximum methane volume (54.5%) produced in the real biogas digester. Interestingly, the biogas digester produced a maximum methane yield of 0.24 m 3 and a methane composition of 60%. Evidently, methane yield was influenced by temperature as well as other meteorological factors in the developed model hence, these factors should be widely considered for sustainable biogas production.

Suggested Citation

  • KeChrist Obileke & Golden Makaka & Nwabunwanne Nwokolo, 2022. "Efficient Methane Production from Anaerobic Digestion of Cow Dung: An Optimization Approach," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-11, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:13:y:2022:i:2:p:53-:d:950716
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/13/2/53/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/13/2/53/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gueguim Kana, E.B. & Oloke, J.K. & Lateef, A. & Adesiyan, M.O., 2012. "Modeling and optimization of biogas production on saw dust and other co-substrates using Artificial Neural network and Genetic Algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 276-281.
    2. Matheri, A.N. & Ndiweni, S.N. & Belaid, M. & Muzenda, E. & Hubert, R., 2017. "Optimising biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of chicken manure and organic fraction of municipal solid waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 756-764.
    3. Zareei, Samira & Khodaei, Jalal, 2017. "Modeling and optimization of biogas production from cow manure and maize straw using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 423-427.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iftikhar Ahmad & Adil Sana & Manabu Kano & Izzat Iqbal Cheema & Brenno C. Menezes & Junaid Shahzad & Zahid Ullah & Muzammil Khan & Asad Habib, 2021. "Machine Learning Applications in Biofuels’ Life Cycle: Soil, Feedstock, Production, Consumption, and Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-27, August.
    2. Olatunji, Kehinde O. & Ahmed, Noor A. & Madyira, Daniel M. & Adebayo, Ademola O. & Ogunkunle, Oyetola & Adeleke, Oluwatobi, 2022. "Performance evaluation of ANFIS and RSM modeling in predicting biogas and methane yields from Arachis hypogea shells pretreated with size reduction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 288-303.
    3. Ao, Tianjie & Chen, Lin & Chen, Yichao & Liu, Xiaofeng & Wan, Liping & Li, Dong, 2021. "The screening of early warning indicators and microbial community of chicken manure thermophilic digestion at high organic loading rate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    4. Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Sarsaiya, Surendra & Wainaina, Steven & Rajendran, Karthik & Kumar, Sumit & Quan, Wang & Duan, Yumin & Awasthi, Sanjeev Kumar & Chen, Hongyu & Pandey, Ashok & Zhang, Zengqiang , 2019. "A critical review of organic manure biorefinery models toward sustainable circular bioeconomy: Technological challenges, advancements, innovations, and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 115-131.
    5. Huayong Zhang & Di An & Yudong Cao & Yonglan Tian & Jinxian He, 2021. "Modeling the Methane Production Kinetics of Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Agricultural Wastes Using Sigmoidal Functions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-12, January.
    6. Elahi, Ehsan & Zhang, Zhixin & Khalid, Zainab & Xu, Haiyun, 2022. "Application of an artificial neural network to optimise energy inputs: An energy- and cost-saving strategy for commercial poultry farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    7. Abdel daiem, Mahmoud M. & Hatata, Ahmed & Galal, Osama H. & Said, Noha & Ahmed, Dalia, 2021. "Prediction of biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge and wheat straw using two-dimensional mathematical models and an artificial neural network," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 226-240.
    8. Jha, Sunil Kr. & Bilalovic, Jasmin & Jha, Anju & Patel, Nilesh & Zhang, Han, 2017. "Renewable energy: Present research and future scope of Artificial Intelligence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 297-317.
    9. Zhou, Man & Li, Cheng & Ni, Fuquan & Chen, Anjun & Li, Meiliang & Shen, Guanghui & Deng, Yu & Deng, Liangwei, 2022. "Packed activated carbon particles triggered a more robust syntrophic pathway for acetate oxidation-hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis at extremely high ammonia concentrations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 305-317.
    10. Chinese, D. & Patrizio, P. & Nardin, G., 2014. "Effects of changes in Italian bioenergy promotion schemes for agricultural biogas projects: Insights from a regional optimization model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 189-205.
    11. Sakiewicz, P. & Piotrowski, K. & Ober, J. & Karwot, J., 2020. "Innovative artificial neural network approach for integrated biogas – wastewater treatment system modelling: Effect of plant operating parameters on process intensification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    12. Soltanali, Hamzeh & Nikkhah, Amin & Rohani, Abbas, 2017. "Energy audit of Iranian kiwifruit production using intelligent systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 646-654.
    13. Djatkov, Djordje & Effenberger, Mathias & Martinov, Milan, 2014. "Method for assessing and improving the efficiency of agricultural biogas plants based on fuzzy logic and expert systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 163-175.
    14. Willeghems, Gwen & Buysse, Jeroen, 2016. "Changing old habits: The case of feeding patterns in anaerobic digesters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 212-221.
    15. Abdullah Nsair & Senem Onen Cinar & Ayah Alassali & Hani Abu Qdais & Kerstin Kuchta, 2020. "Operational Parameters of Biogas Plants: A Review and Evaluation Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-27, July.
    16. Navodita Bhatnagar & David Ryan & Richard Murphy & Anne-Marie Enright, 2020. "Trace Element Supplementation and Enzyme Addition to Enhance Biogas Production by Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Litter," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-14, July.
    17. Leila Ezzatzadegan & Rubiyah Yusof & Noor Azian Morad & Parvaneh Shabanzadeh & Nur Syuhana Muda & Tohid N. Borhani, 2021. "Experimental and Artificial Intelligence Modelling Study of Oil Palm Trunk Sap Fermentation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, April.
    18. Małgorzata Smuga-Kogut & Tomasz Kogut & Roksana Markiewicz & Adam Słowik, 2021. "Use of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Amount of Bioethanol Obtained from Lignocellulosic Biomass with the Use of Ionic Liquids for Pretreatment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, January.
    19. Postawa, Karol & Szczygieł, Jerzy & Kułażyński, Marek, 2020. "A comprehensive comparison of ODE solvers for biochemical problems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 624-633.
    20. Izabela Konkol & Lesław Świerczek & Adam Cenian, 2023. "Chicken Manure Pretreatment for Enhancing Biogas and Methane Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-13, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:13:y:2022:i:2:p:53-:d:950716. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.