Author
Listed:
- Zetian Zhang
(International Magnesium Institute, College of Resources and Environment, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)
- Guangzhao Gao
(International Magnesium Institute, College of Resources and Environment, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)
- Jinghui Yu
(College of Bee Science and Biomedicine, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)
- Runzhi Zhan
(International Magnesium Institute, College of Resources and Environment, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)
- Hongyu Yang
(International Magnesium Institute, College of Resources and Environment, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)
- Zhengjia He
(International Magnesium Institute, College of Resources and Environment, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)
- Bin Dong
(College of Bee Science and Biomedicine, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)
- Jindun Fan
(College of Life Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)
- Yina Fang
(College of Horticulture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)
- Sisi Zeng
(International College, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)
- Xinyu Xuan
(International Magnesium Institute, College of Resources and Environment, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)
- Siyi Wang
(International Magnesium Institute, College of Resources and Environment, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)
- Liangquan Wu
(International Magnesium Institute, College of Resources and Environment, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)
- Wenhao Yang
(International Magnesium Institute, College of Resources and Environment, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)
- Lijin Guo
(International Magnesium Institute, College of Resources and Environment, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)
Abstract
In the context of agricultural green transformation, the balance between the environmental footprint and economic return is a key indicator for measuring the synergy of high yields, high efficiency, and environmental friendliness in agricultural systems. However, the pathways and mechanisms for achieving this synergy in orchard systems remain unclear. Based on a three-year field experiment in Pinghe County, Fujian Province, a comprehensive evaluation framework integrating life cycle assessment (LCA) was constructed. This framework was used to systematically analyze the differences in the net ecosystem economic benefit (EEB) and environmental impact of four fertilization regimes: the conventional farming regime with no mulching (A; 1084 kg N ha −1 , 914 kg P 2 O 5 ha −1 , and 906 kg K 2 O ha −1 ), the conventional farming regime with mulching (B), the optimized fertilization regime with water–fertilizer integration (C; 250 kg N ha −1 , 200 kg K 2 O ha −1 , 100 kg MgO ha −1 , and 400 kg CaO ha −1 ), and the optimized fertilization regime with controlled-release fertilizers (D). The results showed that regime D performed best in terms of yield, nutrient-use efficiency, and EEB, which increased by 220.5% and 297.5% compared with regime A, and reduced the input cost by CNY 63,100~69,000 hm −2 . Moreover, compared with regime A, regimes B, C, and D significantly reduced the carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus footprints, respectively, with the carbon footprint reduced by 6.7~21.7%, 72.4~74.8%, and 71.6~76.5%; the nitrogen footprint reduced by 2.6~19.0%, 80.7~82.2%, and 80.1~83.4%; and the phosphorus footprint reduced by 15.3%, 100%, and 100%. Furthermore, the comprehensive evaluation index (CEI) is D > C > B > A. In total, the three optimized regimes balanced high yield with environmental sustainability, with the D regime showing the best performance, offering scientific support for transitioning to low-carbon, high-value orchards in smallholder systems.
Suggested Citation
Zetian Zhang & Guangzhao Gao & Jinghui Yu & Runzhi Zhan & Hongyu Yang & Zhengjia He & Bin Dong & Jindun Fan & Yina Fang & Sisi Zeng & Xinyu Xuan & Siyi Wang & Liangquan Wu & Wenhao Yang & Lijin Guo, 2025.
"Balancing Productivity and Environmental Sustainability in Pomelo Production Through Controlled-Release Fertilizer Optimization,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-29, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:13:p:1367-:d:1687469
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:13:p:1367-:d:1687469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.