IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i11p1159-d1666479.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Properties of Grassland Habitats in Organic and Conventional Farms Located in Mountainous Areas—A Case Study from the Western Sudetes

Author

Listed:
  • Krzysztof Solarz

    (Doctoral School, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-375 Wrocław, Poland
    Institute of Agroecology and Plant Production, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-361 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Dradrach

    (Institute of Agroecology and Plant Production, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-361 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Marta Czarniecka-Wiera

    (Institute of Agroecology and Plant Production, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-361 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Adam Bogacz

    (Institute of Soil Science, Plant Nutrition and Environmental Protection, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-357 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Anna Karczewska

    (Institute of Soil Science, Plant Nutrition and Environmental Protection, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-357 Wrocław, Poland)

Abstract

Organic farming is becoming increasingly important in agricultural production, especially in mountain and foothill areas. In organic farms, unlike conventional ones, no mineral fertilization or chemical plant protection is used, which often limits the economic efficiency of production. It is commonly believed that conventional farming poses a threat to biodiversity due to the use of mineral fertilization, chemical plant protection, and highly productive crop varieties, and the products obtained are in many respects of lower quality than those from organic farms. The aim of this work is to compare the quality and fertility of soils and the biodiversity of grasslands in organic and conventional farms, using the example of a foothill area within the commune of Kamienna Góra located in the Western Sudetes. Thirty-three areas representing 11 farms that produce dairy cattle in a grazing system were selected for analysis. The properties of soils in organic and conventional farms and their nutrient status did not differ significantly, except for the content of available potassium, which was higher in the group of organic farms. This fact seems to be related to the type of parent rock. All soils had acidic, slightly acidic, or strongly acidic pH levels. The greatest differences between pastures in organic and conventional farms concerned the sward species composition and biodiversity indices. Grasslands in organic farms were much richer in species, which was reflected by the species richness (SR) index and the F-fidelity index. The species inventoried clearly formed two groups that are characteristic of organic and conventional grasslands. The greater biodiversity of grasslands in organic farms did not have a significant effect on the fodder value of the sward, which should be considered good, allowing producers to participate in short supply chains. However, in all farms, regardless of their type, it would be advisable to carry out gentle liming.

Suggested Citation

  • Krzysztof Solarz & Agnieszka Dradrach & Marta Czarniecka-Wiera & Adam Bogacz & Anna Karczewska, 2025. "Properties of Grassland Habitats in Organic and Conventional Farms Located in Mountainous Areas—A Case Study from the Western Sudetes," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:11:p:1159-:d:1666479
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/11/1159/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/11/1159/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alon Tal, 2018. "Making Conventional Agriculture Environmentally Friendly: Moving beyond the Glorification of Organic Agriculture and the Demonization of Conventional Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Timothy C. Durham & Tamás Mizik, 2021. "Comparative Economics of Conventional, Organic, and Alternative Agricultural Production Systems," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-22, April.
    3. Aleksandra Kowalska & Milena Bieniek, 2022. "Meeting the European green deal objective of expanding organic farming," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 17(3), pages 607-633, September.
    4. Reddy, B. Suresh, 2010. "Organic Farming: Status, Issues and Prospects – A Review," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 23(2), July.
    5. Justyna Mencel & Barbara Futa & Agnieszka Mocek-Płóciniak & Łukasz Mendyk & Agnieszka Piernik & Tomasz Kaczmarek & Bartłomiej Glina, 2022. "Interplay between Selected Chemical and Biochemical Soil Properties in the Humus Horizons of Grassland Soils with Low Water Table Depth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-11, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aleksandra Kowalska & Julia Wojciechowska-Solis & Milena Bieniek & Monika Ratajczyk & Louise Manning, 2023. "Declared non-buyers of organic food: A study of young British and Polish consumer profiles," Ekonomista, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, issue 1, pages 28-50.
    2. Kalle Margus & Viacheslav Eremeev & Evelin Loit & Eve Runno-Paurson & Erkki Mäeorg & Anne Luik & Liina Talgre, 2022. "Impact of Farming System on Potato Yield and Tuber Quality in Northern Baltic Sea Climate Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-12, April.
    3. Bang, Rasmus & Hansen, Bjørn Gunnar & Guajardo, Mario & Sommerseth, Jon Kristian & Flaten, Ola & Asheim, Leif Jarle, 2024. "Conventional or organic cattle farming? Trade-offs between crop yield, livestock capacity, organic premiums, and government payments," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    4. Paula Silva, 2025. "Adolescents’ Perceptions of Sustainable Diets: Myths, Realities, and School-Based Interventions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-28, June.
    5. Giuseppe Craparo & Elisa Isabel Cano Montero & Jesús Fernando Santos Peñalver, 2024. "Trends in the circular economy applied to the agricultural sector in the framework of the SDGs," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 26699-26729, October.
    6. Anna Nowak & Monika Różańska‐Boczula, 2024. "A comparative view of the level of agricultural sustainability – The case of European Union member states," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 2638-2652, June.
    7. Luczka, Wladyslawa, 2023. "Problemy Rozwoju Rolnictwa Ekologicznego w Opinii Rolników," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2023(4).
    8. Hana Vašková & Pavel Saska, 2024. "Comparison of Organic and Conventional Agriculture in the Czech Republic: A Systematic Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Ruihao Ma & Shaohua Yin, 2024. "Rural Economic Transformation and Household Consumption Structure: An Empirical Study in the Context of Urbanization," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 18286-18302, December.
    10. Florian Ahrens & Johann Land & Susan Krumdieck, 2022. "Decarbonization of Nitrogen Fertilizer: A Transition Engineering Desk Study for Agriculture in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-24, July.
    11. Christian Nansen, 2024. "Active Learning, Living Laboratories, Student Empowerment, and Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-14, May.
    12. Bartłomiej Bajan & Joanna Łukasiewicz & Aldona Mrówczyńska-Kamińska, 2021. "Energy Consumption and Its Structures in Food Production Systems of the Visegrad Group Countries Compared with EU-15 Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, July.
    13. Tatiana Bullová & Zuzana Bajusová & Peter Bielik & Erwin Schmid & Rastislav Skalský & Jozef Takáč & Viktória Benďáková & Izabela Adamičková & Natália Turčeková & Ján Jobbágy, 2024. "Impact assessment of climate change at farm level: A methodological approach based on integrated biophysical and economic models," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(12), pages 577-590.
    14. Wladyslawa Luczka & Joanna Smoluk-Sikorska & Julia Wojciechowska-Solis, 2024. "Opportunities and Barriers to the Development of Organic Farming from the Perspective of Conventional Farms," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 607-619.
    15. Eliana Martinez & Carlos Alberto Marcillo-Paguay & Eliana Gisela Revelo-Gomez & Mónica Cuervo & Erika Paola Igua-Urbano, 2024. "Effect of Flowering Strips in Associated Broccoli and Lettuce Crops on Increasing Land Use Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-26, May.
    16. Sang-Mo Kang & Arjun Adhikari & Dibya Bhatta & Ho-Jun Gam & Min-Ji Gim & Joon-Ik Son & Jin Y. Shin & In-Jung Lee, 2022. "Comparison of Effects of Chemical and Food Waste-Derived Fertilizers on the Growth and Nutrient Content of Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L.)," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-12, February.
    17. Gábor Gyarmati, 2024. "Transformation of the Three Pillars of Agri-Food Sustainability around the COVID-19 Crisis—A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-31, June.
    18. Ruggiero Sardaro & Daniela Panio & Paweł Chmieliński & Piermichele La Sala, 2024. "Efficiency of the Integrated Production Systems: Evidence from the Winegrowing Firms in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, June.
    19. Hongyu Wang & Apurbo Sarkar & Lu Qian, 2021. "Evaluations of the Roles of Organizational Support, Organizational Norms and Organizational Learning for Adopting Environmentally Friendly Technologies: A Case of Kiwifruit Farmers’ Cooperatives of Me," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-23, March.
    20. Clarisse Mendoza Gonzalvo & Wilson Jr. Florendo Aala & Keshav Lall Maharjan, 2021. "Farmer Decision-Making on the Concept of Coexistence: A Comparative Analysis between Organic and Biotech Farmers in the Philippines," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:11:p:1159-:d:1666479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.