IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i10p1066-d1656888.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Biofertilizer on Yield and Quality of Crops and Properties of Soil Under Field Conditions in China: A Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Baolei Pei

    (Jiangsu Provincial Agricultural Green and Low Carbon Production Technology Engineering Research Center, College of Life Science and Food Engineering, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huai’an 223003, China)

  • Ting Liu

    (Jiangsu Provincial Agricultural Green and Low Carbon Production Technology Engineering Research Center, College of Life Science and Food Engineering, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huai’an 223003, China)

  • Ziyan Xue

    (Jiangsu Provincial Agricultural Green and Low Carbon Production Technology Engineering Research Center, College of Life Science and Food Engineering, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huai’an 223003, China
    Jiangsu Coastal Area Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Yancheng 224002, China)

  • Jian Cao

    (Jiangsu Provincial Agricultural Green and Low Carbon Production Technology Engineering Research Center, College of Life Science and Food Engineering, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huai’an 223003, China)

  • Yunpeng Zhang

    (Jiangsu Provincial Agricultural Green and Low Carbon Production Technology Engineering Research Center, College of Life Science and Food Engineering, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huai’an 223003, China)

  • Mulan Yu

    (Jiangsu Provincial Agricultural Green and Low Carbon Production Technology Engineering Research Center, College of Life Science and Food Engineering, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huai’an 223003, China
    Jiangsu Coastal Area Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Yancheng 224002, China)

  • Engang Liu

    (Jiangsu Provincial Agricultural Green and Low Carbon Production Technology Engineering Research Center, College of Life Science and Food Engineering, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huai’an 223003, China
    Chaimihe Agriculture Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd., Huai’an 223002, China)

  • Jincheng Xing

    (Jiangsu Coastal Area Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Yancheng 224002, China)

  • Feibing Wang

    (Jiangsu Provincial Agricultural Green and Low Carbon Production Technology Engineering Research Center, College of Life Science and Food Engineering, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huai’an 223003, China)

  • Xuqin Ren

    (Jiangsu Provincial Agricultural Green and Low Carbon Production Technology Engineering Research Center, College of Life Science and Food Engineering, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huai’an 223003, China)

  • Zhenhua Zhang

    (Jiangsu Coastal Area Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Yancheng 224002, China
    School of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia)

Abstract

Biofertilizers play a crucial role in promoting sustainable agriculture in China; however, comprehensive quantification of their effects and limitations in field conditions remain unclear. In this study, a meta-analysis encompassing 1818 comparisons from 107 studies was conducted to quantify their systematic effects in field conditions in China. The results demonstrated that biofertilizers enhanced crop yields across 21 of the 23 investigated crops, with notable increases in millet (+65.42%), vegetables (e.g., Chinese cabbage +35.57%, ginger +39.18%), and legumes (kidney beans +54.03%), while cotton and rapeseed showed non-significant improvements. Nutritional quality was also improved, as evidenced by elevated levels of vitamin C (14.61%), protein (16.61%), and carotenoids (15.18%), alongside a reduction in nitrate content (21.94%). Soil health was significantly improved through increased organic matter (16.64%), enhanced enzymatic activities (urease: 57.60%; phosphatase: 43.51%), and a proliferation of beneficial microbes (bacteria: 157.10%; fungi: 30.28%), while pathogenic organisms were suppressed by 51.81%. The observed yield improvements were attributed to enhanced nutrient availability (total nitrogen: 16.67%; available phosphorus: 10.98%), optimized root growth (19.23% increase in volume), and a reduction in disease incidence (42.52%). The efficacy of biofertilizers was maximized when they were used in conjunction with organic amendments, resulting in a 29.20% increase in yield, particularly when applied prior to planting. These results show that biofertilizers boost productivity, quality, and soil functionality, depending on their production and field management practices. Their effectiveness is tied to optimizing soil properties and suppressing pathogens, providing strategies for sustainable agriculture in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Baolei Pei & Ting Liu & Ziyan Xue & Jian Cao & Yunpeng Zhang & Mulan Yu & Engang Liu & Jincheng Xing & Feibing Wang & Xuqin Ren & Zhenhua Zhang, 2025. "Effects of Biofertilizer on Yield and Quality of Crops and Properties of Soil Under Field Conditions in China: A Meta-Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-22, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:10:p:1066-:d:1656888
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/10/1066/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/10/1066/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baolei Pei & Yunpeng Zhang & Ting Liu & Jian Cao & Huai Ji & Zhenzhu Hu & Xinxin Wu & Feibing Wang & Ying Lu & Ningyi Chen & Junkang Zhou & Boqing Chen & Sa Zhou, 2024. "Effects of seaweed fertilizer application on crops’ yield and quality in field conditions in China-A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(7), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Johan Rockström & Will Steffen & Kevin Noone & Åsa Persson & F. Stuart Chapin & Eric F. Lambin & Timothy M. Lenton & Marten Scheffer & Carl Folke & Hans Joachim Schellnhuber & Björn Nykvist & Cynthia , 2009. "A safe operating space for humanity," Nature, Nature, vol. 461(7263), pages 472-475, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nelson, Ewan & Warren, Peter, 2020. "UK transport decoupling: On track for clean growth in transport?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 39-51.
    2. Richter, Andries & Dakos, Vasilis, 2015. "Profit fluctuations signal eroding resilience of natural resources," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 12-21.
    3. Rostami-Tabar, Bahman & Ali, Mohammad M. & Hong, Tao & Hyndman, Rob J. & Porter, Michael D. & Syntetos, Aris, 2022. "Forecasting for social good," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1245-1257.
    4. Huiyuan Guan & Yongping Bai & Chunyue Zhang, 2022. "Research on Ecosystem Security and Restoration Pattern of Urban Agglomeration in the Yellow River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Filipa Correia & Philipp Erfruth & Julie Bryhn, 2018. "The 2030 Agenda: The roadmap to GlobALLizaton," Working Papers 156, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    6. Birgit Kopainsky & Anita Frehner & Adrian Müller, 2020. "Sustainable and healthy diets: Synergies and trade‐offs in Switzerland," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 908-927, November.
    7. Hervé Corvellec & Johan Hultman & Anne Jerneck & Susanne Arvidsson & Johan Ekroos & Niklas Wahlberg & Timothy W. Luke, 2021. "Resourcification: A non‐essentialist theory of resources for sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(6), pages 1249-1256, November.
    8. Pérez-Sánchez, Laura & Velasco-Fernández, Raúl & Giampietro, Mario, 2021. "The international division of labor and embodied working time in trade for the US, the EU and China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    9. Islam, Moinul & Kotani, Koji & Managi, Shunsuke, 2016. "Climate perception and flood mitigation cooperation: A Bangladesh case study," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 117-133.
    10. Yutong Zhang & Wei Zhou & Danxue Luo, 2023. "The Relationship Research between Biodiversity Conservation and Economic Growth: From Multi-Level Attempts to Key Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    11. Carina Mueller & Christopher West & Mairon G. Bastos Lima & Bob Doherty, 2023. "Demand-Side Actors in Agricultural Supply Chain Sustainability: An Assessment of Motivations for Action, Implementation Challenges, and Research Frontiers," World, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-20, September.
    12. Janet Judy McIntyre‐Mills, 2013. "Anthropocentrism and Well‐being: A Way Out of the Lobster Pot?," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 136-155, March.
    13. Hametner, Markus, 2022. "Economics without ecology: How the SDGs fail to align socioeconomic development with environmental sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    14. Ronja Teschner & Jessica Ruppen & Basil Bornemann & Rony Emmenegger & Lucía Aguirre Sánchez, 2021. "Mapping Sustainable Diets: A Comparison of Sustainability References in Dietary Guidelines of Swiss Food Governance Actors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
    15. Kim, Yeon-Su & Rodrigues, Marcos & Robinne, François-Nicolas, 2021. "Economic drivers of global fire activity: A critical review using the DPSIR framework," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    16. Barbara Predan & Petra Černe Oven, 2023. "Developing a Pedagogical Approach with the Aim of Empowering Educators and Students to Address Emerging Global Issues such as Climate Change and Social Justice: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-22, December.
    17. Kaltenegger, Oliver & Löschel, Andreas & Pothen, Frank, 2017. "The effect of globalisation on energy footprints: Disentangling the links of global value chains," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(S1), pages 148-168.
    18. Hörisch, Jacob & Ortas, Eduardo & Schaltegger, Stefan & Álvarez, Igor, 2015. "Environmental effects of sustainability management tools: An empirical analysis of large companies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 241-249.
    19. Zhang, Yanjie & Pan, Ying & Li, Meng & Wang, Zhipeng & Wu, Junxi & Zhang, Xianzhou & Cao, Yanan, 2021. "Impacts of human appropriation of net primary production on ecosystem regulating services in Tibet," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    20. Gampe, Anja & Hubmann, Georg & Kapeller, Jakob, 2024. "Sozialer Fortschritt in offenen Gesellschaften des 21. Jahrhunderts: Unrealistische Utopie oder notwendige Möglichkeit?," ifso working paper series 31, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Socioeconomics (ifso).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:10:p:1066-:d:1656888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.