IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i3p413-d1350578.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design and Experiment of Profiling Furrow-Ridge Terrain by Cane Leaf-Chopping and Returning Machine

Author

Listed:
  • Biao Zhang

    (Guangxi Key Laboratory of Manufacturing Systems and Advanced Manufacturing Technology, College of Mechanical Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
    Guangxi Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Ecological Restoration Technology, Nanning 530007, China)

  • Cheng Gao

    (Guangxi Key Laboratory of Manufacturing Systems and Advanced Manufacturing Technology, College of Mechanical Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Weimin Shen

    (Guangxi Key Laboratory of Manufacturing Systems and Advanced Manufacturing Technology, College of Mechanical Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Baoshan Chen

    (Academy of Sugarcane and Sugar Industry, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

Abstract

Conventional straw-returning machines were incompatible with ridge cultivation terrain and unevenly distributed materials, resulting in substandard operations such as insufficient leaf fragmentation, damage to ratoon stumps, and high cutting energy consumption. In this regard, this paper proposes a novel profiling configuration of chopping and returning machine to adapt to the coverage characteristics of cane leaves in furrow-ridge terrain. The leaves piled at furrow sole are intensively collected and fed into the whirling space by the flexible hook teeth assembly, and are cooperatively broken by the unequal-length swing blades densely arranged along the double helix. Based on the measured topographic trends and dynamic analysis of the leaf-shredding process, experimental factors affecting profiling cutting and picking capabilities of the main components were determined. Further, using chopping qualification rate ( CQR ) and fragmentation degree ( CFD ) as indicators, field trails were conducted through a response surface method to test the comprehensive crushing performance of the machine. After multi-objective optimization, the optimal structural and operating parameters were determined as: blade length gradient of 1.57 cm, teeth spacing of 6.84 cm and feed speed of 3.2 km/h. With such adaptive configurations, CQR and CFD reached 81.14% and 0.101, respectively, which were significantly improved by 60.50% and 47.99% compared to those of conventional machines. Crushed leaves appeared to be more thoroughly mixed with the soil and more evenly spread in the field. Meanwhile, the traction resistance tended to be stable, with an effective RSM 45.85% lower than the value of higher-level blade gradient, indicating a better overall fit with the irregular terrain. This study can provide a reference for the development of leaf-chopping and returning machines suitable for ridge-type crops.

Suggested Citation

  • Biao Zhang & Cheng Gao & Weimin Shen & Baoshan Chen, 2024. "Design and Experiment of Profiling Furrow-Ridge Terrain by Cane Leaf-Chopping and Returning Machine," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:413-:d:1350578
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/3/413/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/3/413/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaab, Ali & Sharifi, Mohammad & Mobli, Hossein & Nabavi-Pelesaraei, Ashkan & Chau, Kwok-wing, 2019. "Use of optimization techniques for energy use efficiency and environmental life cycle assessment modification in sugarcane production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1298-1320.
    2. Xiaoxing Weng & Dapeng Tan & Gang Wang & Changqing Chen & Lianyou Zheng & Mingan Yuan & Duojiao Li & Bin Chen & Li Jiang & Xinrong Hu, 2023. "CFD Simulation and Optimization of the Leaf Collecting Mechanism for the Riding-Type Tea Plucking Machine," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-21, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fuzhong Chen & Guohai Jiang & Kangyin Dong, 2022. "How do FDI inflows curvilinearly affect carbon emissions? Threshold effects of energy service availability and cleanliness," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 798-824, December.
    2. Nabavi-Pelesaraei, Ashkan & Azadi, Hossein & Van Passel, Steven & Saber, Zahra & Hosseini-Fashami, Fatemeh & Mostashari-Rad, Fatemeh & Ghasemi-Mobtaker, Hassan, 2021. "Prospects of solar systems in production chain of sunflower oil using cold press method with concentrating energy and life cycle assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    3. Šarauskis, Egidijus & Romaneckas, Kęstutis & Jasinskas, Algirdas & Kimbirauskienė, Rasa & Naujokienė, Vilma, 2020. "Improving energy efficiency and environmental mitigation through tillage management in faba bean production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    4. Naseri, Hakim & Parashkoohi, Mohammad Gholami & Ranjbar, Iraj & Zamani, Davood Mohammad, 2021. "Energy-economic and life cycle assessment of sugarcane production in different tillage systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    5. Vida Dabkienė & Tomas Baležentis & Dalia Štreimikienė, 2022. "Reconciling the micro‐ and macro‐perspective in agricultural energy efficiency analysis for sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 149-164, February.
    6. Danzhu Zhang & Ruirui Zhang & Liping Chen & Linhuan Zhang & Tongchuan Yi & Quan Feng, 2025. "Adaptive Tracking and Cutting Control System for Tea Canopy: Design and Experimental Evaluation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, March.
    7. Takunda Shabani & Steven Jerie & Tapiwa Shabani, 2023. "Applicability of the Life Cycle Assessment Model in Solid Waste Management in Zimbabwe," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 2233-2253, December.
    8. Khanali, Majid & Akram, Asadollah & Behzadi, Javad & Mostashari-Rad, Fatemeh & Saber, Zahra & Chau, Kwok-wing & Nabavi-Pelesaraei, Ashkan, 2021. "Multi-objective optimization of energy use and environmental emissions for walnut production using imperialist competitive algorithm," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    9. Kumar Ganti, Praful & Naik, Hrushikesh & Kanungo Barada, Mohanty, 2022. "Environmental impact analysis and enhancement of factors affecting the photovoltaic (PV) energy utilization in mining industry by sparrow search optimization based gradient boosting decision tree appr," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    10. Li, Guoxuan & Wang, Shuai & Zhao, Jiangang & Qi, Huaqing & Ma, Zhaoyuan & Cui, Peizhe & Zhu, Zhaoyou & Gao, Jun & Wang, Yinglong, 2020. "Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of biomass-to-hydrogen production with methane tri-reforming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    11. Tiwari, Aviral Kumar & Boachie, Micheal Kofi & Suleman, Muhammed Tahir & Gupta, Rangan, 2021. "Structure dependence between oil and agricultural commodities returns: The role of geopolitical risks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    12. Asadi Fouzi, Mohammad Hossein & Namjoo, Amin & Kohestani, Akbar, 2025. "Analysis of energy scenarios and cumulative exergy demand of CDQ steam power plant based on life cycle perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    13. Zou, Songchun & Zhao, Wanzhong, 2020. "Energy optimization strategy of vehicle DCS system based on APSO algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    14. Heidari, Mohammad Davoud & Turner, Ian & Ardestani-Jaafari, Amir & Pelletier, Nathan, 2021. "Operations research for environmental assessment of crop-livestock production systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    15. Guodong Liu & Zhi Li & Yaosuo Xue & Kevin Tomsovic, 2022. "Microgrid Assisted Design for Remote Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-23, May.
    16. Zhu, Yuli & Liang, Ji & Yang, Qing & Zhou, Hewen & Peng, Kun, 2019. "Water use of a biomass direct-combustion power generation system in China: A combination of life cycle assessment and water footprint analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    17. Ciardiello, Adriana & Rosso, Federica & Dell'Olmo, Jacopo & Ciancio, Virgilio & Ferrero, Marco & Salata, Ferdinando, 2020. "Multi-objective approach to the optimization of shape and envelope in building energy design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    18. Liu, Yigang & Li, Guoxuan & Chen, Zhengrun & Shen, Yuanyuan & Zhang, Hongru & Wang, Shuai & Qi, Jianguang & Zhu, Zhaoyou & Wang, Yinglong & Gao, Jun, 2020. "Comprehensive analysis of environmental impacts and energy consumption of biomass-to-methanol and coal-to-methanol via life cycle assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    19. Zhe Du & Liyuan Zhang & Xinping Li & Xin Jin & Fan Yu, 2024. "Optimizing Efficiency of Tea Harvester Leaf-Collection Pipeline: Numerical Simulation and Experimental Validation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, April.
    20. Pedro Zea & Cristina Pascual & Luis G. García-Montero & Hugo Cedillo, 2025. "NDVI Performance for Monitoring Agricultural Energy Inputs Using Landsat Imagery: A Study in the Ecuadorian Andes (2012–2023)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-23, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:413-:d:1350578. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.