IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i4p782-d1110428.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Short-Term Biochar Impacts on Crop Performance and Soil Quality in Arid Sandy Loam Soil

Author

Listed:
  • Lindsay Keller

    (Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, New Mexico State University, P.O. Box 30003, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA)

  • Omololu John Idowu

    (Department of Extension Plant Sciences, New Mexico State University, P.O. Box 30003, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA)

  • April Ulery

    (Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, New Mexico State University, P.O. Box 30003, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA)

  • Mohammed Omer

    (Department of Extension Plant Sciences, New Mexico State University, P.O. Box 30003, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA)

  • Catherine E. Brewer

    (Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, New Mexico State University, P.O. Box 30001, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA)

Abstract

A two-year field study was conducted in sandy loam soil to evaluate the impacts of biochar on soil quality and the growth and yields of pinto bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris ) and sorghum–Sudan ( Sorghum × drummondii ). A wood-derived commercial biochar was applied at three rates to pinto bean (PB) and sorghum–Sudan (SS) plots. The biochar application rates applied annually for two years to PB plots were 0, 2.2, and 11.2 Mg ha −1 , whereas the rates for SS plots were 0, 3.4, and 6.7 Mg ha −1 . Crop growth and harvest parameters were evaluated. Assessed soil measurements included pH, electrical conductivity, available nutrients, soil organic matter (SOM), permanganate oxidizable carbon (POXC), soil aggregates, and volumetric soil moisture content. The results showed no significant differences in plant growth parameters and yields over the two growing seasons for both PB and SS. Compared to the control treatment, the biochar at 11.2 Mg ha −1 in PB plots improved soil moisture retention after irrigation by 19% in the first year and 25% in the second year. The SOM in the SS plot at 6.7 Mg ha −1 biochar rate was higher (1.02%) compared to the control plot (0.82%), whereas a similar increase was not observed in the PB plot. Although biochar rates did not affect most of the soil measurements, there were significant changes in soil properties over time, regardless of biochar treatments: POXC increased in the PB and SS plots; SOM increased in the SS plot; and electrical conductivity, sodium adsorption ratio, and most soil micronutrients decreased. This research was conducted over two years; the effects of biochar can persist for much longer, indicating the need for longer-term biochar field studies in arid agroecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Lindsay Keller & Omololu John Idowu & April Ulery & Mohammed Omer & Catherine E. Brewer, 2023. "Short-Term Biochar Impacts on Crop Performance and Soil Quality in Arid Sandy Loam Soil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:782-:d:1110428
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/4/782/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/4/782/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mahmoodabadi, Majid & Yazdanpanah, Najme & Sinobas, Leonor Rodríguez & Pazira, Ebrahim & Neshat, Ali, 2013. "Reclamation of calcareous saline sodic soil with different amendments (I): Redistribution of soluble cations within the soil profile," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 30-38.
    2. Yunhe Zhang & Omololu John Idowu & Catherine E. Brewer, 2016. "Using Agricultural Residue Biochar to Improve Soil Quality of Desert Soils," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, March.
    3. Ana Castro & Nilcileny Da Silva Batista & Agnieszka E. Latawiec & Aline Rodrigues & Bernardo Strassburg & Daniel Silva & Ednaldo Araujo & Luiz Fernando D. De Moraes & Jose Guilherme Guerra & Gabriel G, 2018. "The Effects of Gliricidia -Derived Biochar on Sequential Maize and Bean Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, February.
    4. José Romualdo de Sousa Lima & Maria da Conceição Cavalcanti de Goes & Claude Hammecker & Antonio Celso Dantas Antonino & Érika Valente de Medeiros & Everardo Valadares de Sá Barretto Sampaio & Maria C, 2021. "Effects of Poultry Manure and Biochar on Acrisol Soil Properties and Yield of Common Bean. A Short-Term Field Experiment," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-11, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Laurențiu Constantin Vlăduțoiu & Georgiana Chişiu & Andrei Tudor & Nicolae-Valentin Vlăduț & Lucian Fechete Tutunaru & Eugen Marin & Iulia-Andrea Grigore, 2023. "Tribological Study of Chisel Knives in Sandy Soil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Sukhan Rattanaloeadnusorn & Nopparat Buddhakala & Thanasak Lomthong, 2023. "Utilization of Palm Oil Midrib Biochar as Soil Amendment with a Newly Isolated Bacillus sp. SM11 for Growth Enhancement and Nitrate Reduction in Romaine Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L. var. longifolia )," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-11, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fibrianty Minhal & Azwar Ma'as & Eko Hanudin & Putu Sudira, 2020. "Improvement of the chemical properties and buffering capacity of coastal sandy soil as affected by clays and organic by-product application," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 15(2), pages 93-100.
    2. María Alcívar & Andrés Zurita-Silva & Marco Sandoval & Cristina Muñoz & Mauricio Schoebitz, 2018. "Reclamation of Saline–Sodic Soils with Combined Amendments: Impact on Quinoa Performance and Biological Soil Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Wioletta Żukiewicz-Sobczak & Agnieszka Latawiec & Paweł Sobczak & Bernardo Strassburg & Dorota Plewik & Małgorzata Tokarska-Rodak, 2020. "Biochars Originating from Different Biomass and Pyrolysis Process Reveal to Have Different Microbial Characterization: Implications for Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-13, February.
    4. Wu, Zhuqing & Fan, Yaqiong & Qiu, Yuan & Hao, Xinmei & Li, Sien & Kang, Shaozhong, 2022. "Response of yield and quality of greenhouse tomatoes to water and salt stresses and biochar addition in Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    5. Das, Bianca T. & Menzies, Neal W. & Dalzell, Scott A. & McKenna, Brigid A. & Kopittke, Peter M., 2022. "Avoiding the point of no return: Maintaining infiltration to remediate saline-sodic Vertosols in high rainfall environments," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    6. Zhang, Tao & Wang, Ting & Liu, KS & Wang, Lixue & Wang, Kun & Zhou, Yan, 2015. "Effects of different amendments for the reclamation of coastal saline soil on soil nutrient dynamics and electrical conductivity responses," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 115-122.
    7. Chaganti, Vijayasatya N. & Crohn, David M. & Šimůnek, Jirka, 2015. "Leaching and reclamation of a biochar and compost amended saline–sodic soil with moderate SAR reclaimed water," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 255-265.
    8. Moritz Von Cossel & Iris Lewandowski & Berien Elbersen & Igor Staritsky & Michiel Van Eupen & Yasir Iqbal & Stefan Mantel & Danilo Scordia & Giorgio Testa & Salvatore Luciano Cosentino & Oksana Maliar, 2019. "Marginal Agricultural Land Low-Input Systems for Biomass Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-25, August.
    9. Katarzyna Anna Koryś & Agnieszka Ewa Latawiec & Katarzyna Grotkiewicz & Maciej Kuboń, 2019. "The Review of Biomass Potential for Agricultural Biogas Production in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-13, November.
    10. Li, Yanpei & Wang, Jiao & Shao, Ming’an, 2021. "Effects of earthworm casts on water and salt movement in typical Loess Plateau soils under brackish water irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    11. Zhang, Tibin & Zhan, Xiaoyun & He, Jianqiang & Feng, Hao & Kang, Yaohu, 2018. "Salt characteristics and soluble cations redistribution in an impermeable calcareous saline-sodic soil reclaimed with an improved drip irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 91-99.
    12. Monaliza Alves dos Santos & Maria Betânia Galvão Santos Freire & Fernando José Freire & Alexandre Tavares da Rocha & Pedro Gabriel de Lucena & Cinthya Mirella Pacheco Ladislau & Hidelblandi Farias de , 2022. "Reclamation of Saline Soil under Association between Atriplex nummularia L. and Glycophytes Plants," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, July.
    13. Zhongqi He & Dan C. Olk & Haile Tewolde & Hailin Zhang & Mark Shankle, 2019. "Carbohydrate and Amino Acid Profiles of Cotton Plant Biomass Products," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    14. Demis Andrade Foronda & Gilles Colinet, 2022. "Combined Application of Organic Amendments and Gypsum to Reclaim Saline–Alkali Soil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-10, July.
    15. Qurat-ul-Ain & Aisha Nazir & Sergio C. Capareda & Muhammad Shafiq & Firdaus-e-Bareen, 2021. "Valorization of Cotton Gin Trash through Thermal and Biological Conversion for Soil Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-12, December.
    16. Mandana Shaygan & Thomas Baumgartl, 2020. "Simulation of the Effect of Climate Variability on Reclamation Success of Brine-Affected Soil in Semi-Arid Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, January.
    17. Kafula Chisanga & Ernest Mbega & Patrick Alois Ndakidemi, 2020. "Maize ( Zea mays ) Response to Anthill Soil ( Termitaria ), Manure and NPK Fertilization Rate under Conventional and Reduced Tillage Cropping Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, January.
    18. Margarita Ramírez-Carmona & Leidy Rendón-Castrillón & Carlos Ocampo-López & Diego Sánchez-Osorno, 2022. "Fish Food Production Using Agro-Industrial Waste Enhanced with Spirulina sp," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:782-:d:1110428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.