IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i12p2207-d1289492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Variability in Estimating Crop Model Genotypic Parameters: The Impact of Different Sampling Methods and Sizes

Author

Listed:
  • Xintian Ma

    (State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-arid Arable Land in Northern China, The Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Xiangyi Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-arid Arable Land in Northern China, The Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Yingbin He

    (State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-arid Arable Land in Northern China, The Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
    Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Yan Zha

    (State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-arid Arable Land in Northern China, The Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Huicong Chen

    (School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300387, China)

  • Shengnan Han

    (Agricultural Information Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

Generic parameter calibration for crop growth models is a very important step in model use. However, studies of the effect of sample size and sampling methods on the calibration and validation of genotypic parameters have seldom been conducted. Scientists commonly apply the hold-out (HO) method, by default, to deal with samples for calibration and validation in the practice of model use. In this paper, we applied the hold-out, cross-validation (CA), and bootstrapping (BS) methods with different sample sizes to analyze the influence of sampling methods and sample size on the final calibration results of genotypic parameters. The results showed that, (1) overall, CA and BS performed better than HO at most observation stations. However, there was great variability in the calibration and validation results obtained from the three methods. (2) Because of data quality differences, we could not conclude that the more samples there were, the greater the validation accuracy of the three methods. (3) The CV of the genotypic parameter values for the three methods and sample sizes varied greatly. Thus, when genotypic parameter calibration is performed, both sampling methods and sample size should be considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Xintian Ma & Xiangyi Wang & Yingbin He & Yan Zha & Huicong Chen & Shengnan Han, 2023. "Variability in Estimating Crop Model Genotypic Parameters: The Impact of Different Sampling Methods and Sizes," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:12:p:2207-:d:1289492
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/12/2207/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/12/2207/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ines, Amor V.M. & Honda, Kiyoshi & Das Gupta, Ashim & Droogers, Peter & Clemente, Roberto S., 2006. "Combining remote sensing-simulation modeling and genetic algorithm optimization to explore water management options in irrigated agriculture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 83(3), pages 221-232, June.
    2. Wang, Haidong & Cheng, Minghui & Liao, Zhenqi & Guo, Jinjin & Zhang, Fucang & Fan, Junliang & Feng, Hao & Yang, Qiliang & Wu, Lifeng & Wang, Xiukang, 2023. "Performance evaluation of AquaCrop and DSSAT-SUBSTOR-Potato models in simulating potato growth, yield and water productivity under various drip fertigation regimes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hosein Sheibani & Hosein Alizadeh & Mojtaba Shourian, 2019. "Optimum Design and Operation of a Reservoir and Irrigation Network Considering Uncertainty of Hydrologic, Agronomic and Economic Factors," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(2), pages 863-879, January.
    2. Jiang, Yao & Xu, Xu & Huang, Quanzhong & Huo, Zailin & Huang, Guanhua, 2016. "Optimizing regional irrigation water use by integrating a two-level optimization model and an agro-hydrological model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 76-88.
    3. Hassan-Esfahani, Leila & Torres-Rua, Alfonso & McKee, Mac, 2015. "Assessment of optimal irrigation water allocation for pressurized irrigation system using water balance approach, learning machines, and remotely sensed data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 42-50.
    4. Bastiaanssen, W.G.M. & Allen, R.G. & Droogers, P. & D'Urso, G. & Steduto, P., 2007. "Twenty-five years modeling irrigated and drained soils: State of the art," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 111-125, September.
    5. S. Dutta & B.C. Sahoo & Rajashree Mishra & S. Acharya, 2016. "Fuzzy Stochastic Genetic Algorithm for Obtaining Optimum Crops Pattern and Water Balance in a Farm," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(12), pages 4097-4123, September.
    6. Geerts, Sam & Raes, Dirk, 2009. "Deficit irrigation as an on-farm strategy to maximize crop water productivity in dry areas," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(9), pages 1275-1284, September.
    7. Ngo-Hoang, Dai-Long, 2019. "Writing Research Articles for Publication," AgriXiv qmd3y, Center for Open Science.
    8. Jiang, Yao & Xu, Xu & Huang, Quanzhong & Huo, Zailin & Huang, Guanhua, 2015. "Assessment of irrigation performance and water productivity in irrigated areas of the middle Heihe River basin using a distributed agro-hydrological model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 67-81.
    9. Jesus Puma-Cahua & Germán Belizario & Wilber Laqui & Roberto Alfaro & Edilberto Huaquisto & Elmer Calizaya, 2023. "Evaluating the Yields of the Rainfed Potato Crop under Climate Change Scenarios Using the AquaCrop Model in the Peruvian Altiplano," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Pinto, Victor Meriguetti & Reichardt, Klaus & van Dam, Jos & Lier, Quirijn de Jong van & Bruno, Isabeli Pereira & Durigon, Angelica & Dourado-Neto, Durval & Bortolotto, Rafael Pivotto, 2015. "Deep drainage modeling for a fertigated coffee plantation in the Brazilian savanna," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 130-140.
    11. Li, Xuemin & Zhang, Jingwen & Cai, Ximing & Huo, Zailin & Zhang, Chenglong, 2023. "Simulation-optimization based real-time irrigation scheduling: A human-machine interactive method enhanced by data assimilation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    12. Chen, Serena H. & Jakeman, Anthony J. & Norton, John P., 2008. "Artificial Intelligence techniques: An introduction to their use for modelling environmental systems," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 379-400.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:12:p:2207-:d:1289492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.