IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i9p1410-d908964.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agricultural Equipment Design Optimization Based on the Inversion Method

Author

Listed:
  • Oleksiy Alfyorov

    (Department of Engineering Systems Design, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Sumy National Agrarian University, Herasima Kondratieva St., 160, 40000 Sumy, Ukraine)

  • Oleksandr Grynchenko

    (Department of Operation, Reliability, Strength and Construction, Kharkiv Petro Vasylenko National Technical University of Agriculture, Alchevskyh St., 44, 61002 Kharkiv, Ukraine)

  • Victor Ponomarenko

    (Department of Operation, Reliability, Strength and Construction, Kharkiv Petro Vasylenko National Technical University of Agriculture, Alchevskyh St., 44, 61002 Kharkiv, Ukraine)

  • Taras Shchur

    (Department of Cars and Tractors, Faculty of Mechanics, Energy and Information Technology, Lviv National Environmental University, 1 Volodymyr Great St., 80381 Dubliany, Ukraine)

  • Andrzej Tomporowski

    (Department of Machines and Technical Systems, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Al. Prof. S. Kaliskiego 7, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

  • Weronika Kruszelnicka

    (Department of Machines and Technical Systems, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Al. Prof. S. Kaliskiego 7, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

  • Patrycja Walichnowska

    (Department of Machines and Technical Systems, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, Al. Prof. S. Kaliskiego 7, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

Abstract

A representative statistical analysis of the operational information of the reliability of tillage units, which have operating devices with an oscillating motion, was carried out. The results of the working condition of thirteen cultivators in operation, with an accumulated operating time of more than 280 thousand hectares, were considered. A field investigation was carried out in seven regions in Ukraine, characterizing various edaphoclimatic conditions. The occurrence of sudden failures due to the fracture of the elastic struttings of cultivator operating devices was established. There were 42 sudden failures among 260 tested struttings. The inversion method was proposed to determine the elastic elements’ loading parameters being a combination of the theoretical reliability model, which was adapted to the probability of failure-free operation prediction due to the fact of sudden failures, and statistical model-specific indicators that were obtained depending on the operating elastic struttings. The given approach, based on the evaluation of the operating tillage units, made it possible to determine the impact of the load on the existing designs of the machines and their elements leading to the sudden failures. It was possible to present such an influence in the form of a probabilistically justified reserve factor, which had an empirical basis and allowed for the design of the next generation of technical systems and their elements to correct the theoretically assumed load value. Constructive and technological changes in the design, based on the approach described in this article, provide an opportunity to manage the level of reliability for economic and image reasons.

Suggested Citation

  • Oleksiy Alfyorov & Oleksandr Grynchenko & Victor Ponomarenko & Taras Shchur & Andrzej Tomporowski & Weronika Kruszelnicka & Patrycja Walichnowska, 2022. "Agricultural Equipment Design Optimization Based on the Inversion Method," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-9, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1410-:d:908964
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1410/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1410/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiao, Ning-Cong & Zuo, Ming J. & Zhou, Chengning, 2018. "A new adaptive sequential sampling method to construct surrogate models for efficient reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 330-338.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Jinhui & Tao, Yourui & Han, Xu, 2023. "Polynomial chaos expansion approximation for dimension-reduction model-based reliability analysis method and application to industrial robots," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    2. Puppo, L. & Pedroni, N. & Maio, F. Di & Bersano, A. & Bertani, C. & Zio, E., 2021. "A Framework based on Finite Mixture Models and Adaptive Kriging for Characterizing Non-Smooth and Multimodal Failure Regions in a Nuclear Passive Safety System," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    3. Chengning Zhou & Ning-Cong Xiao & Ming J Zuo & Xiaoxu Huang, 2020. "AK-PDF: An active learning method combining kriging and probability density function for efficient reliability analysis," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(3), pages 536-549, June.
    4. Wang, Jiaqi & Zhang, Limao & Yang, Hui & Liu, Huabei & Skibniewski, Mirosław J., 2024. "Dynamic reliability analysis of Aerial Building Machine under extreme wind loads using improved QBDC-based active learning," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    5. Jiang, Chen & Qiu, Haobo & Yang, Zan & Chen, Liming & Gao, Liang & Li, Peigen, 2019. "A general failure-pursuing sampling framework for surrogate-based reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 47-59.
    6. Keshtegar, Behrooz & Chakraborty, Subrata, 2018. "An efficient-robust structural reliability method by adaptive finite-step length based on Armijo line search," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 195-206.
    7. Fan Yang & Zhimin Xu, 2020. "Multidisciplinary reliability analysis of turbine blade with shape uncertainty by Kriging model and free-form deformation methods," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(4), pages 611-621, August.
    8. Li, Xiaoke & Zhu, Heng & Chen, Zhenzhong & Ming, Wuyi & Cao, Yang & He, Wenbin & Ma, Jun, 2022. "Limit state Kriging modeling for reliability-based design optimization through classification uncertainty quantification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    9. Jiang, Chen & Yan, Yifang & Wang, Dapeng & Qiu, Haobo & Gao, Liang, 2021. "Global and local Kriging limit state approximation for time-dependent reliability-based design optimization through wrong-classification probability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    10. Zhang, Xufang & Wang, Lei & Sørensen, John Dalsgaard, 2019. "REIF: A novel active-learning function toward adaptive Kriging surrogate models for structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 440-454.
    11. Zhang, Jinhao & Xiao, Mi & Gao, Liang, 2019. "An active learning reliability method combining Kriging constructed with exploration and exploitation of failure region and subset simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 90-102.
    12. Keshtegar, Behrooz & Chakraborty, Souvik, 2018. "Dynamical accelerated performance measure approach for efficient reliability-based design optimization with highly nonlinear probabilistic constraints," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 69-83.
    13. Wei, Pengfei & Liu, Fuchao & Tang, Chenghu, 2018. "Reliability and reliability-based importance analysis of structural systems using multiple response Gaussian process model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 183-195.
    14. Saraygord Afshari, Sajad & Enayatollahi, Fatemeh & Xu, Xiangyang & Liang, Xihui, 2022. "Machine learning-based methods in structural reliability analysis: A review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    15. Dong, Manman & Cheng, Yongbo & Wan, Liangqi, 2024. "A new adaptive multi-kernel relevance vector regression for structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    16. Jiang, Chen & Qiu, Haobo & Gao, Liang & Wang, Dapeng & Yang, Zan & Chen, Liming, 2020. "EEK-SYS: System reliability analysis through estimation error-guided adaptive Kriging approximation of multiple limit state surfaces," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    17. Teixeira, Rui & Martinez-Pastor, Beatriz & Nogal, Maria & O’Connor, Alan, 2021. "Reliability analysis using a multi-metamodel complement-basis approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    18. Wang, Run-Zi & Gu, Hang-Hang & Zhu, Shun-Peng & Li, Kai-Shang & Wang, Ji & Wang, Xiao-Wei & Hideo, Miura & Zhang, Xian-Cheng & Tu, Shan-Tung, 2022. "A data-driven roadmap for creep-fatigue reliability assessment and its implementation in low-pressure turbine disk at elevated temperatures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    19. Wang, Run-Zi & Gu, Hang-Hang & Liu, Yu & Miura, Hideo & Zhang, Xian-Cheng & Tu, Shan-Tung, 2023. "Surrogate-modeling-assisted creep-fatigue reliability assessment in a low-pressure turbine disc considering multi-source uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    20. Xiao, Ning-Cong & Yuan, Kai & Zhan, Hongyou, 2022. "System reliability analysis based on dependent Kriging predictions and parallel learning strategy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1410-:d:908964. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.