IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v219y2022ics095183202100692x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

AKSE: A novel adaptive Kriging method combining sampling region scheme and error-based stopping criterion for structural reliability analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Jinsheng
  • Xu, Guoji
  • Li, Yongle
  • Kareem, Ahsan

Abstract

The reliability analysis of complex structures usually involves implicit performance function and expensive-to-evaluate computational models, which pose a great challenge for the estimation of failure probability. In this paper, an adaptive Kriging-based method is proposed for the efficient estimation of failure probability with high accuracy. Starting from a small set of initial design of experiments (DoE), a Kriging model is constructed and iteratively refined by adding judiciously selected sample points to the DoE. To effectively select more sample points for updating the Kriging model, a new learning function is proposed for the selection of representative samples following the idea of the penalty function method in optimization. Besides, the inclusion of the term that measures the distance between the candidate samples and those in DoE controls the density of samples, and thus enables efficient exploration of the regions of interest. To improve the efficiency of the algorithm, this learning function is integrated with a sampling region scheme to filter out sample points in regions with rather low probability density from the candidate sampling pool. Moreover, a convergence criterion based on the error-based stopping criterion is developed to terminate the learning process at an appropriate stage. Hence, the proposed method is referred to as the Adaptive Kriging method combining Sampling region scheme and Error-based stopping criterion (AKSE). To further explore the possible schemes for the improvement of the proposed method, the combinations of AKSE with a dynamic Kriging method and the bootstrap variance are also investigated. For rare failure events, the Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) in AKSE is replaced by the importance sampling (IS) to establish an improved version of AKSE, namely the AKSE-IS. The performance of the proposed algorithm is evaluated through five numerical examples and the results demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed method both in terms of accuracy and efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Jinsheng & Xu, Guoji & Li, Yongle & Kareem, Ahsan, 2022. "AKSE: A novel adaptive Kriging method combining sampling region scheme and error-based stopping criterion for structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:219:y:2022:i:c:s095183202100692x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.108214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183202100692X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108214?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sun, Zhili & Wang, Jian & Li, Rui & Tong, Cao, 2017. "LIF: A new Kriging based learning function and its application to structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 152-165.
    2. D den Hertog & J P C Kleijnen & A Y D Siem, 2006. "The correct Kriging variance estimated by bootstrapping," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(4), pages 400-409, April.
    3. Zhang, Xufang & Wang, Lei & Sørensen, John Dalsgaard, 2019. "REIF: A novel active-learning function toward adaptive Kriging surrogate models for structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 440-454.
    4. Xiao, Ning-Cong & Zuo, Ming J. & Zhou, Chengning, 2018. "A new adaptive sequential sampling method to construct surrogate models for efficient reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 330-338.
    5. Bourinet, J.-M., 2016. "Rare-event probability estimation with adaptive support vector regression surrogates," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 210-221.
    6. Wang, Zeyu & Shafieezadeh, Abdollah, 2019. "REAK: Reliability analysis through Error rate-based Adaptive Kriging," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 33-45.
    7. Jing, Zhao & Chen, Jianqiao & Li, Xu, 2019. "RBF-GA: An adaptive radial basis function metamodeling with genetic algorithm for structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 42-57.
    8. Echard, B. & Gayton, N. & Lemaire, M. & Relun, N., 2013. "A combined Importance Sampling and Kriging reliability method for small failure probabilities with time-demanding numerical models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 232-240.
    9. Gaspar, B. & Teixeira, A.P. & Guedes Soares, C., 2017. "Adaptive surrogate model with active refinement combining Kriging and a trust region method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 277-291.
    10. Shi, Yan & Lu, Zhenzhou & He, Ruyang & Zhou, Yicheng & Chen, Siyu, 2020. "A novel learning function based on Kriging for reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    11. Cadini, F. & Santos, F. & Zio, E., 2014. "An improved adaptive kriging-based importance technique for sampling multiple failure regions of low probability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 109-117.
    12. Paolo Gardoni, 2017. "Risk and Reliability Analysis," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Paolo Gardoni (ed.), Risk and Reliability Analysis: Theory and Applications, pages 3-24, Springer.
    13. Roy, Atin & Chakraborty, Subrata, 2020. "Support vector regression based metamodel by sequential adaptive sampling for reliability analysis of structures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    14. Chen, Weidong & Xu, Chunlong & Shi, Yaqin & Ma, Jingxin & Lu, Shengzhuo, 2019. "A hybrid Kriging-based reliability method for small failure probabilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 31-41.
    15. Wen, Zhixun & Pei, Haiqing & Liu, Hai & Yue, Zhufeng, 2016. "A Sequential Kriging reliability analysis method with characteristics of adaptive sampling regions and parallelizability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 170-179.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhou, Tong & Peng, Yongbo, 2022. "Ensemble of metamodels-assisted probability density evolution method for structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    2. Zhou, Jin & Li, Jie, 2022. "An enhanced method for improving the accuracy of small failure probability of structures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    3. Luo, Changqi & Zhu, Shun-Peng & Keshtegar, Behrooz & Niu, Xiaopeng & Taylan, Osman, 2023. "An enhanced uniform simulation approach coupled with SVR for efficient structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    4. Ma, Yuan-Zhuo & Zhu, Yi-Chen & Li, Hong-Shuang & Nan, Hang & Zhao, Zhen-Zhou & Jin, Xiang-Xiang, 2022. "Adaptive Kriging-based failure probability estimation for multiple responses," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    5. Zhang, Yu & Dong, You & Xu, Jun, 2023. "An accelerated active learning Kriging model with the distance-based subdomain and a new stopping criterion for reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    6. Wang, Jinsheng & Xu, Guoji & Yuan, Peng & Li, Yongle & Kareem, Ahsan, 2024. "An efficient and versatile Kriging-based active learning method for structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    7. Zhang, Chi & Shafieezadeh, Abdollah, 2022. "Simulation-free reliability analysis with active learning and Physics-Informed Neural Network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    8. Zhang, Yu & Dong, You & Frangopol, Dan M., 2024. "An error-based stopping criterion for spherical decomposition-based adaptive Kriging model and rare event estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    9. Zhou, Tong & Peng, Yongbo, 2022. "Reliability analysis using adaptive Polynomial-Chaos Kriging and probability density evolution method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    10. Pepper, Nick & Crespo, Luis & Montomoli, Francesco, 2022. "Adaptive learning for reliability analysis using Support Vector Machines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Jinsheng & Xu, Guoji & Yuan, Peng & Li, Yongle & Kareem, Ahsan, 2024. "An efficient and versatile Kriging-based active learning method for structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    2. Jiang, Chen & Qiu, Haobo & Yang, Zan & Chen, Liming & Gao, Liang & Li, Peigen, 2019. "A general failure-pursuing sampling framework for surrogate-based reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 47-59.
    3. Zhang, Yu & Dong, You & Xu, Jun, 2023. "An accelerated active learning Kriging model with the distance-based subdomain and a new stopping criterion for reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    4. Saraygord Afshari, Sajad & Enayatollahi, Fatemeh & Xu, Xiangyang & Liang, Xihui, 2022. "Machine learning-based methods in structural reliability analysis: A review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    5. Chen, Weidong & Xu, Chunlong & Shi, Yaqin & Ma, Jingxin & Lu, Shengzhuo, 2019. "A hybrid Kriging-based reliability method for small failure probabilities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 31-41.
    6. Shi, Yan & Lu, Zhenzhou & He, Ruyang & Zhou, Yicheng & Chen, Siyu, 2020. "A novel learning function based on Kriging for reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    7. Teixeira, Rui & Martinez-Pastor, Beatriz & Nogal, Maria & O’Connor, Alan, 2021. "Reliability analysis using a multi-metamodel complement-basis approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    8. Wang, Zeyu & Shafieezadeh, Abdollah, 2020. "Real-time high-fidelity reliability updating with equality information using adaptive Kriging," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    9. Li, Junxiang & Chen, Jianqiao, 2019. "Solving time-variant reliability-based design optimization by PSO-t-IRS: A methodology incorporating a particle swarm optimization algorithm and an enhanced instantaneous response surface," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    10. Zhang, Jinhao & Gao, Liang & Xiao, Mi, 2020. "A composite-projection-outline-based approximation method for system reliability analysis with hybrid uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    11. Zhang, Xufang & Wang, Lei & Sørensen, John Dalsgaard, 2019. "REIF: A novel active-learning function toward adaptive Kriging surrogate models for structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 440-454.
    12. Wei, Pengfei & Liu, Fuchao & Tang, Chenghu, 2018. "Reliability and reliability-based importance analysis of structural systems using multiple response Gaussian process model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 183-195.
    13. Xiongxiong You & Mengya Zhang & Diyin Tang & Zhanwen Niu, 2022. "An active learning method combining adaptive kriging and weighted penalty for structural reliability analysis," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(1), pages 160-172, February.
    14. Jing, Zhao & Chen, Jianqiao & Li, Xu, 2019. "RBF-GA: An adaptive radial basis function metamodeling with genetic algorithm for structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 42-57.
    15. Wang, Zeyu & Shafieezadeh, Abdollah, 2020. "On confidence intervals for failure probability estimates in Kriging-based reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    16. Xiong, Yifang & Sampath, Suresh, 2021. "A fast-convergence algorithm for reliability analysis based on the AK-MCS," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    17. Keshtegar, Behrooz & Chakraborty, Subrata, 2018. "An efficient-robust structural reliability method by adaptive finite-step length based on Armijo line search," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 195-206.
    18. Ni, Pinghe & Li, Jun & Hao, Hong & Yan, Weimin & Du, Xiuli & Zhou, Hongyuan, 2020. "Reliability analysis and design optimization of nonlinear structures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    19. Teixeira, Rui & Nogal, Maria & O’Connor, Alan & Martinez-Pastor, Beatriz, 2020. "Reliability assessment with density scanned adaptive Kriging," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    20. Wang, Jian & Sun, Zhili & Cao, Runan, 2021. "An efficient and robust Kriging-based method for system reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:219:y:2022:i:c:s095183202100692x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.