IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v13y2023i2p51-d1061330.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Warehouse Value-Added Services Using Pareto as a Quality Tool: A Case Study of Third-Party Logistics Service Provider

Author

Listed:
  • Luay Jum’a

    (Logistic Sciences Department, Business School, German Jordanian University, Amman 11180, Jordan)

  • Muath Esam Basheer

    (Logistic Sciences Department, Business School, German Jordanian University, Amman 11180, Jordan)

Abstract

The study aims to analyse warehouse value-added services (VAS) data for a third-party logistics (3PL) service provider, which leads to identifying service improvements and cost-cutting opportunities in performing VAS for clients using Pareto analysis as a quality tool. Using a case study approach, qualitative and quantitative data were collected from a leading 3PL firm in Belgium. The approach is conducted by applying major steps of Pareto analysis. Two pharmaceutical products were analysed according to medical general classification, namely narcotic analgesics (NA) and ophthalmic antihistamines and decongestants (OAD). The results showed that the Pareto principle is proven in the NA—ticketing case, and five activities consumed 83.3 percent of the total time of VAS operations. Furthermore, in the OAD—display case, the Pareto principle is proven and six activities were validated as they accounted for 81.26 percent of the total time of primary VAS operations. The study recommended a solution to each of the four causes of delay, including lack of training/best practices, inefficient space utilization, lack of automation, and lack of cohesiveness and planning. Despite the recognized importance of avoiding warehouse operation inefficiencies, the literature lacks studies applied to practice, and few contributions exist regarding analysing 3PL service providers’ warehousing VAS operations data. This study identified all VAS activities for temperature-controlled pharmaceutical products. Moreover, the study proposes a warehouse operations improvement framework for non-automated 3PL warehouses and guides managers through Pareto analysis to cut costs and improve service level.

Suggested Citation

  • Luay Jum’a & Muath Esam Basheer, 2023. "Analysis of Warehouse Value-Added Services Using Pareto as a Quality Tool: A Case Study of Third-Party Logistics Service Provider," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:51-:d:1061330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/13/2/51/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/13/2/51/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tritos Laosirihongthong & Dotun Adebanjo & Premaratne Samaranayake & Nachiappan Subramanian & Sakun Boon-itt, 2018. "Prioritizing warehouse performance measures in contemporary supply chains," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 67(9), pages 1703-1726, November.
    2. Rivera, Liliana & Sheffi, Yossi & Knoppen, Desirée, 2016. "Logistics clusters: The impact of further agglomeration, training and firm size on collaboration and value added services," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 285-294.
    3. Xumei Zhang & Xiaopeng Han & Xiangyu Liu & Ru Liu & Jinzhong Leng, 2015. "The pricing of product and value-added service under information asymmetry: a product life cycle perspective," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(1), pages 25-40, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luay Jum’a & Marwan Mansour, 2023. "Cruising to Success: Unveiling the Financial Harmony of Container Shipping Firms through Total Quality Management and Service Excellence," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-23, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Weihua Liu & Shangsong Long & Yanjie Liang & Jinkun Wang & Shuang Wei, 2023. "The influence of leadership and smart level on the strategy choice of the smart logistics platform: a perspective of collaborative innovation participation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 893-935, May.
    2. Liu, Weihua & Yan, Xiaoyu & Wei, Wanying & Xie, Dong, 2019. "Pricing decisions for service platform with provider’s threshold participating quantity, value-added service and matching ability," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 410-432.
    3. Pan, Jeh-Nan & Nguyen, Hung Thi Ngoc, 2015. "Achieving customer satisfaction through product–service systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 179-190.
    4. Yanan Ji & Yi Li & Wenzhi Tang, 2022. "Service Investment and Pricing Strategies in E-Commerce Platforms With Seller Competition," International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management (IJISSCM), IGI Global, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Shiming Yi & Liying Yu & Ziyuan Zhang, 2020. "Research on Pricing Strategy of Dual-Channel Supply Chain Based on Customer Value and Value-Added Service," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Liu, Sijing & He, Nannan & Cao, Xindan & Li, Guoqi & Jian, Ming, 2022. "Logistics cluster and its future development: A comprehensive research review," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    7. Yang, Zhiwei & Chen, Xiaohong & Pan, Ruixu & Yuan, Quan, 2022. "Exploring location factors of logistics facilities from a spatiotemporal perspective: A case study from Shanghai," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    8. Dominik Bertram & Tobias Chilla & Carola Wilhelm, 2021. "Short Value Chains in Food Production: The Role of Spatial Proximity for Economic and Land Use Dynamics," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, September.
    9. Gilseung Ahn & You-Jin Park & Sun Hur, 2017. "Probabilistic Graphical Framework for Estimating Collaboration Levels in Cloud Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Li, Hengyu & Chen, Huangen & Chai, Junwu & Shi, Victor, 2023. "Private label sourcing for an e-tailer with agency selling and service provision," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(1), pages 114-127.
    11. Dalila Ribaudo, 2023. "Tracking the Van: The role of forward linkages in logistics MNEs' location choices across European NUTS 3 regions," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 102(2), pages 331-362, April.
    12. Elisabeth F. Mueller & Carola Jungwirth, 2022. "Are cooperative firms more agile? A contingency perspective on small and medium-sized enterprises in agglomerations and peripheral areas," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 281-302, January.
    13. Fernanda Ilhéu & Gonçalo Simões, 2017. "Is the Logistics Sector in China Still a Constraint to Supplying its Domestic Market?," CEsA Working Papers 162, CEsA - Center for African and Development Studies.
    14. Tianjian Yang & Chunmei Li & Xiongping Yue & Beibei Zhang, 2022. "Decisions for Blockchain Adoption and Information Sharing in a Low Carbon Supply Chain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-23, June.
    15. Zheng, Zhijun & Li, Gang & Cheng, T.C.E & Wu, Feng, 2022. "Offline supplementary service strategies for the online marketplace: Third-party service or marketplace service?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    16. Meiling He & Jiaren Shen & Xiaohui Wu & Jianqiang Luo, 2018. "Logistics Space: A Literature Review from the Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, August.
    17. Dezhi Zhang & Jiehui Jiang & Shuangyan Li & Xiamiao Li & Qingwen Zhan, 2017. "Optimal Investment Timing and Size of a Logistics Park: A Real Options Perspective," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-12, December.
    18. Basso, Franco & Guajardo, Mario & Varas, Mauricio, 2020. "Collaborative job scheduling in the wine bottling process," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    19. Jiaxin Wang & Qinghong Xie & Xinyu Geng, 2024. "Exploring the Effects of Multi-Governance Mechanisms throughout the Dynamic Evolution of the Cooperative Innovation Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-27, February.
    20. Feng Fu & Shuangying Chen & Wei Yan, 2023. "Implications of e-tailers’ transition from reselling to the combined reselling and agency selling," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1885-1920, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:51-:d:1061330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.