IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v13y2023i2p32-d1047205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Human Resources Information System (HRIS) to Enhance Civil Servants’ Innovation Outcomes: Compulsory or Complimentary?

Author

Listed:
  • Evi Satispi

    (Faculty of Social Science and Political Science, Muhammadiyah University Jakarta, Banten 15419, Indonesia)

  • Ismi Rajiani

    (Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Lambung Mangkurat University, Banjarmasin 70123, Indonesia)

  • Mamun Murod

    (Faculty of Social Science and Political Science, Muhammadiyah University Jakarta, Banten 15419, Indonesia)

  • Andriansyah Andriansyah

    (Faculty of Social Science and Political Science, Muhammadiyah University Jakarta, Banten 15419, Indonesia)

Abstract

The Internet of things (IoT) has oriented organisations digitally in administrating human resources. In line with this trend, Indonesian public sectors are adopting Human Resources Information Systems (HRIS) to boost employee innovation outcomes. However, coercive pressure to implement HRIS has only resulted in fiascos for the technology, which cannot be fully considered to eliminate long, ineffective, and inefficient practices. This study examines the instrumental adoption factors to adopt HRIS in boosting employee innovation outcomes from technological, organisational, people, and social outlooks. The empirical data consisting of 500 valid datasets were obtained from public servants in Indonesia via web-based questionnaires. structural equation modelling (SEM), which was used to examine the relationship among constructs. Technology fit, organisational resources, knowledge, and social influences have positive impacts on technology adoption. However, when treated as a mediation, the negative path from HRIS to innovation outcomes implied that e-HRM reflected in HRIS implementation would not make employees innovative. The scrutinized under ability, motivation, and opportunity (AMO) framework and empirical insights clearly portray that Indonesian’s ability to fit into this framework is problematical, making technological innovation in the Indonesian public sector only complimentary, not compulsory. This study suggests that HRM reform in public organisations is a top priority if the country wishes to achieve world-class bureaucracy by 2025.

Suggested Citation

  • Evi Satispi & Ismi Rajiani & Mamun Murod & Andriansyah Andriansyah, 2023. "Human Resources Information System (HRIS) to Enhance Civil Servants’ Innovation Outcomes: Compulsory or Complimentary?," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:32-:d:1047205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/13/2/32/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/13/2/32/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcial Vazquez & Albert Sunyer, 2021. "Antecedents of User Acceptance of Electronic Human Resource Management Systems (e-HRM) at SEAT," International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals (IJHCITP), IGI Global, vol. 12(4), pages 65-84, October.
    2. Mohsin Shahzad & Ying Qu & Abaid Ullah Zafar & Andrea Appolloni, 2021. "Does the interaction between the knowledge management process and sustainable development practices boost corporate green innovation?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 4206-4222, December.
    3. Aris Ananta & Ahmad Irsan A. Moeis & Hendro Try Widianto & Heri Yulianto & Evi Nurvidya Arifin, 2021. "Pension and Active Ageing: Lessons Learned from Civil Servants in Indonesia," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Ross H. McLeod, 2006. "Private Sector Lessons for Public Sector Reform in Indonesia," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 13(3), pages 275-288.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rochgiyanti Rochgiyanti & Deasy Arisanty & Ismi Rajiani & Karunia Puji Hastuti & Jumriani Jumriani & Muhammad Muhaimin, 2024. "From Glimmer to Grind: Unveiling the Conflict Potential of South Kalimantan’s Diamonds," World, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-18, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Youtang Zhang & Hagos Mesfin Berhe, 2022. "The Impact of Green Investment and Green Marketing on Business Performance: The Mediation Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Ethiopia’s Chinese Textile Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Javier Martínez‐Falcó & Bartolomé Marco‐Lajara & Patrocinio Zaragoza‐Sáez & Luis A. Millán‐Tudela, 2023. "Analyzing the effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Green Innovation Performance in the Spanish wine industry: A structural equation modeling analysis," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 985-1006, October.
    3. Zeng, Chunying & Ma, Rong & Chen, Peilin, 2024. "Impact of mineral resource rents and fin-tech on green growth: Exploring the mediating role of environmental governance in developed economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    4. Zhou, Chao & Liao, Jinglin, 2024. "Home country digital finance development and post-entry internationalization speed of emerging market SMEs: Empirical evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Xu, Yong & Yuan, Ling & Khalfaoui, Rabeh & Radulescu, Magdalena & Mallek, Sabrine & Zhao, Xin, 2023. "Making technological innovation greener: Does firm digital transformation work?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    6. Violeta Jovanović & Sunčica Stanković & Vesna Krstić, 2023. "Environmental, Social and Economic Sustainability in Mining Companies as a Result of the Interaction between Knowledge Management and Green Innovation—The SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-15, August.
    7. Xinyue Li & Ikram Ullah Khan, 2025. "Green Transformation in Portfolio: The Role of Sustainable Practices in Investment Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-21, January.
    8. Yang, Yanwu & Ren, Haili & Liu, Yutong & Yang, Yusen, 2025. "Integration of technology and finance, digital transformation and corporate green innovation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    9. Liecheng Wang & Min Zhang & Hongwei Cao & Teng Teng, 2025. "The Impacts of Quality Management on Green Material Utilization: A Small- and Medium-Sized Chinese Enterprises’ Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-28, April.
    10. Kalyani K. Mehta & Leng Leng Thang, 2022. "The Introduction of the Special Issue: Asian Perspectives on Active Aging: Meaning, Purpose and Hope," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-3, April.
    11. Mario Vázquez-Maguirre & Alfonso E. Benito, 2022. "Impact or Outputs? Exploring Multinational’s CSR Activities in Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-12, March.
    12. Cheng, Qiang & Liu, Yue & Peng, Chun & He, Xingsong & Qu, Zhouqin & Dong, Qianyu, 2023. "Knowledge digitization: Characteristics, knowledge advantage and innovation performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    13. Krisztina Kis-Katos & Günther G. Schulze, 2013. "Corruption in Southeast Asia: a survey of recent research," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 27(1), pages 79-109, May.
    14. Paolo Maccarrone & Anna Maria Contri, 2021. "Integrating Corporate Social Responsibility into Corporate Strategy: The Role of Formal Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    15. Qader, Ghulam & Junaid, Muhammad & Abbas, Qamar & Mubarik, Muhammad Shujaat, 2022. "Industry 4.0 enables supply chain resilience and supply chain performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    16. Salamatu Bellah Conteh & Moiz Malik & Mohsin Shahzad & Sana Shahid, 2023. "Untangling the Potential of Sustainable Online Information Sources in Shaping Visitors’ Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, September.
    17. Tai Abdulrahman Alshammari & Khalid Mhasan Alshammary & Fahad Maiyah Alshammari, 2022. "Green Product and Process Innovation, Corporate Environmental Ethics and Competitive Advantages among Manufacturing Firms in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 14(2), pages 51-61.
    18. Zenona Ona Atkočiūnienė & Justas Gribovskis & Jurgita Raudeliūnienė, 2022. "Influence of Knowledge Management on Business Processes: Value-Added and Sustainability Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    19. Syahidun & Lenny C. Nawangsari, 2022. "The Effect of Green Human Capital, Green Structural Capital and Green Relation Capital on Company Sustainability by Mediating Green Environment Management," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 11, September.
    20. Jayaprada Putrevu & Charilaos Mertzanis & Ilias Kampouris, 2025. "Sustainable investment conditions, venture capital, and new business creation," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-37, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:32-:d:1047205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.