IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fan/mesame/vhtml10.3280-mesa2023-126oa17287.html

Acquistare innovazione in sanit?: condividere responsabilit? e ruoli. Il caso degli acquisti dei servizi di diagnostica tumorale attraverso il Value-Based Procurement (VBP)

Author

Listed:
  • Fabio Amatucci
  • Manuela Brusoni

Abstract

Nei processi di acquisto di beni e servizi in sanit? si ? di recente affermato un approccio innovativo, denominato Value-Based Procurement (VBP), che rappresenta un cambiamento dal tradizionale modello di risparmio sui costi a breve termine verso un approccio pi? completo, in cui le prestazioni del sistema sanitario, i risultati per il paziente, nonch? l?efficienza e l?efficacia a lungo termine delle decisioni sono elementi fondamentali. Nel presente articolo, viene applicato questo modello all?acquisto del servizio di diagnosi per tumore, per il quale si sta affermando l?utilizzo del ?modello mutazionale?, caratterizzato dall?utilizzo di test diagnostici per la ricerca non tanto della sede tumorale, quanto della tipologia di mutazione genetica. Finalit? del lavoro ? la costruzione di un modello di acquisto basato sul valore, definendo obiettivi da perseguire, indicatori chiave per valutare gli effetti dell?innovazione, modalit? di misurazione del valore generato per i diversi attori in gioco (sistema sanitario; pazienti; fornitori), in un contesto di particolare complessit? scientifica, organizzativa e di impatto economico e sanitario.

Suggested Citation

  • Fabio Amatucci & Manuela Brusoni, 2023. "Acquistare innovazione in sanit?: condividere responsabilit? e ruoli. Il caso degli acquisti dei servizi di diagnostica tumorale attraverso il Value-Based Procurement (VBP)," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(126), pages 71-93.
  • Handle: RePEc:fan:mesame:v:html10.3280/mesa2023-126oa17287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=75378&Tipo=ArticoloPDF
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info: https://www.francoangeli.it/DownloadCredit
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eggleston, Karen, 2005. "Multitasking and mixed systems for provider payment," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 211-223, January.
    2. Dohmen, Peter J.G. & van Raaij, Erik M., 2019. "A new approach to preferred provider selection in health care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(3), pages 300-305.
    3. Frank Eijkenaar, 2013. "Key issues in the design of pay for performance programs," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 14(1), pages 117-131, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kristensen, Søren Rud & Siciliani, Luigi & Sutton, Matt, 2016. "Optimal price-setting in pay for performance schemes in health care," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 57-77.
    2. Oxholm, Anne Sophie & Kristensen, Søren Rud & Sutton, Matt, 2018. "Uncertainty about the effort–performance relationship in threshold-based payment schemes," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 69-83.
    3. Domenico Lisi & Luigi Siciliani & Odd Rune Straume, 2020. "Hospital competition under pay‐for‐performance: Quality, mortality, and readmissions," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 289-314, April.
    4. Katja Grašič & Adrián Villaseñor & James Gaughan & Nils Gutacker & Luigi Siciliani, 2025. "Incentivizing Hospital Quality Through Care Bundling," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(11), pages 2140-2160, November.
    5. Oxholm, Anne Sophie & Di Guida, Sibilla & Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte, 2021. "Allocation of health care under pay for performance: Winners and losers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    6. Luigi Siciliani & James Gaughan & Nils Gutacker & Hugh Gravelle & Martin Chalkley, 2026. "Paying for Health Gains Using Patient Reported Outcome Measures," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(5), pages 831-847, May.
    7. Iezzi, Elisa & Lippi Bruni, Matteo & Ugolini, Cristina, 2014. "The role of GP's compensation schemes in diabetes care: Evidence from panel data," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 104-120.
    8. Nuscheler, Robert & Roeder, Kerstin, 2015. "Financing and funding health care: Optimal policy and political implementability," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 197-208.
    9. Herbst, T. & Foerster, J. & Emmert, M., 2018. "The impact of pay-for-performance on the quality of care in ophthalmology: Empirical evidence from Germany," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(6), pages 667-673.
    10. Étienne Dumont & Bernard Fortin & Nicolas Jacquemet & Bruce Shearer, 2012. "Chapitre 9 : Rémunération mixte et comportement professionnel des spécialistes," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-01114074, HAL.
    11. Antonio Sánchez Soliño, 2019. "Sustainability of Public Services: Is Outsourcing the Answer?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Michele Fioretti & Hongming Wang, 2023. "Performance Pay in Insurance Markets: Evidence from Medicare," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 105(5), pages 1128-1144, September.
    13. Martin Chalkley, 2012. "Contracts, Information and Incentives in Health Care," Chapters, in: Andrew M. Jones (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Health Economics, Second Edition, chapter 22, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Ammi, Mehdi & Fortier, Grant, 2017. "The influence of welfare systems on pay-for-performance programs for general practitioners: A critical review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 157-166.
    15. Adolf Kwadzo Dzampe & Shingo Takahashi, 2024. "Financial incentives and health provider behaviour: Evidence from a capitation policy in Ghana," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 333-344, February.
    16. Jinhu Li & Jeremiah Hurley & Philip DeCicca & Gioia Buckley, 2014. "Physician Response To Pay‐For‐Performance: Evidence From A Natural Experiment," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(8), pages 962-978, August.
    17. David Bardey & Luigi Siciliani, 2021. "Nursing‐homes' competition and distributional implications when the market is two‐sided," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 472-500, May.
    18. Olivella, Pau & Siciliani, Luigi, 2017. "Reputational concerns with altruistic providers," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1-13.
    19. Vu, Thyna & Anderson, Kelly K. & Devlin, Rose Anne & Somé, Nibene H. & Sarma, Sisira, 2021. "Physician remuneration schemes, psychiatric hospitalizations and follow-up care: Evidence from blended fee-for-service and capitation models," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    20. Shandana Shoaib & Bahaudin G. Mujtaba, 2018. "Perverse Incentives and Peccable Behavior in Professionals - A Qualitative Study of the Faculty," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 441-459, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:mesame:v:html10.3280/mesa2023-126oa17287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rosato (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?IDRivista=180 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.