IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fan/macoma/vhtml10.3280-maco2025-001002.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping and measuring IC in Knowledge- Intensive Organizations: An interventionist study

Author

Listed:
  • Domenica Lavorato
  • Alessandra Lardo
  • Rita Lamboglia

Abstract

This research proposes a conceptual framework for mapping and measuring intellectual capital (IC) in knowledge-intensive organizations (KIOs) and designs a tool specifically aimed at identifying and evaluating the processes that lead to the creation, enhancement and maintenance of IC. IC is increasingly recognized as a key strategic asset in today's competitive business environment. However, its intangible nature presents challenges for quantification and it is particularly relevant in KIOs. Despite various frameworks proposed by literature, the practical implementation of IC measurement remains inconsistent, with limited evidence of its adoption and benefits in organizations. This study adopts an interventionist approach, with academics working with a research center to address the issues of IC mapping and measurement. The research findings present a conceptual framework and an IC tool, composed of processes and processes indicators, which has been subsequently tested in a selected department, representing our pilot case. This article contributes to both research and practice on non-financial measurement, by conceptualizing an innovative approach to mapping and measuring IC in the complex context of KIOs.

Suggested Citation

  • Domenica Lavorato & Alessandra Lardo & Rita Lamboglia, 2025. "Mapping and measuring IC in Knowledge- Intensive Organizations: An interventionist study," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2025(1), pages 15-37.
    • Handle: RePEc:fan:macoma:v:html10.3280/maco2025-001002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=77487&Tipo=ArticoloPDF
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info: https://www.francoangeli.it/DownloadCredit
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Slovic, 1993. "Perceived Risk, Trust, and Democracy," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(6), pages 675-682, December.
    2. Bryan J. Hubbell & Jeffrey L. Jordan, 2000. "Joint Production and Averting Expenditure Measures of Willingness to Pay: Do Water Expenditures Really Measure Avoidance Costs?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 82(2), pages 427-437.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cecilia Correggi & Stefano Ghinoi & Riccardo De Vita & Paolo Di Toma, 2025. "A Non-Financial Disclosure Analysis to explore the Role of Digitalization in Enabling Circular Business Models," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2025(1), pages 85-109.
    2. Carmelo Arena & Stefania Veltri & Franco Rubino, 2025. "Eco innovation disclosure in Italian Firms: A Content Analysis Approach," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2025(1), pages 39-58.
    3. Marco Maffei & Alessandra Allini & Ilaria Martino, 2025. "Innovazione vs sostenibilit? (e viceversa)," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2025(1), pages 5-14.
    4. Jenkins, Robin R. & Guignet, Dennis & Walsh, Patrick J., 2014. "Prevention, Cleanup, and Reuse Benefits From the Federal UST Program," National Center for Environmental Economics-NCEE Working Papers 280921, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    5. Muhammad Rahman & Sher Ali & Naveed Hayat, 2022. "Households Health Cost from Water Borne Diseases in District Swat, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan," iRASD Journal of Economics, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 4(4), pages 633-646, December.
    6. Kevin Boyle & Sapna Kaul & Ali Hashemi & Xiaoshu Li, 2015. "Applicability of benefit transfers for evaluation of homeland security counterterrorism measures," Chapters, in: Carol Mansfield & V. K. Smith (ed.), Benefit–Cost Analyses for Security Policies, chapter 10, pages 225-253, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Ann Bostrom & Ragnar E. Löfstedt, 2003. "Communicating Risk: Wireless and Hardwired," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(2), pages 241-248, April.
    8. Christophe Bontemps & Céline Nauges, 2016. "The Impact of Perceptions in Averting-decision Models: An Application of the Special Regressor Method to Drinking Water Choices," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 98(1), pages 297-313.
    9. Johanna Pfeiffer & Andreas Gabriel & Markus Gandorfer, 2021. "Understanding the public attitudinal acceptance of digital farming technologies: a nationwide survey in Germany," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(1), pages 107-128, February.
    10. Saad, Mohsen & Samet, Anis, 2020. "Collectivism and commonality in liquidity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 137-162.
    11. Nahui Zhen & Jon Barnett & Michael Webber, 2020. "Is Trust Always a Precondition for Effective Water Resource Management?," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(4), pages 1423-1436, March.
    12. Wouter Poortinga & Nick F. Pidgeon, 2003. "Exploring the Dimensionality of Trust in Risk Regulation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(5), pages 961-972, October.
    13. Kazuya Nakayachi & George Cvetkovich, 2010. "Public Trust in Government Concerning Tobacco Control in Japan," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 143-152, January.
    14. Rob Goble, 2021. "Through a Glass Darkly: How Natural Science and Technical Communities Looked at Social Science Advances in Understanding Risk," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(3), pages 414-428, March.
    15. Yang, Ya Ling, 2020. "Comparison of public perception and risk management decisions of aircraft noise near Taoyuan and Kaohsiung International Airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    16. Hoti, Ferdiana & Perko, Tanja & Thijssen, Peter & Renn, Ortwin, 2021. "Who is willing to participate? Examining public participation intention concerning decommissioning of nuclear power plants in Belgium," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    17. Diane P. Dupont & W.L. Adamowicz & Alan Krupnick, 2009. "Differences in Water Consumption Choices in Canada: the Role of Socio-demographics, Experiences, and Perceptions of Health Risks," Working Papers 0906, Brock University, Department of Economics.
    18. John D. Graham & John A. Rupp & Olga Schenk, 2015. "Unconventional Gas Development in the USA: Exploring the Risk Perception Issues," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(10), pages 1770-1788, October.
    19. Susan Mello & Robert C. Hornik, 2016. "Media Coverage of Pediatric Environmental Health Risks and its Effects on Mothers’ Protective Behaviors," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(3), pages 605-622, March.
    20. Lee, You-Kyung, 2020. "Sustainability of nuclear energy in Korea: From the users’ perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:macoma:v:html10.3280/maco2025-001002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rosato (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?IDRivista=166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.