IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fan/aimaim/vhtml10.3280-aim2013-001012.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovazione sociale e reti di imprese nello sviluppo rurale

Author

Listed:
  • Pamela Lattanzi
  • Ilaria Trap?

Abstract

La Strategia europa 2020, che ambisce ad una crescita intelligente, sostenibile e inclusiva, sottolinea il ruolo centrale dell?innovazione per lo sviluppo economico e il cambiamento dell?Unione europea. Tutte le politiche unionali devono promuovere l?innovazione nelle loro azioni, ivi comprese la Politica agricola comune e la Politica di sviluppo rurale. L?innovazione promossa si basa su un concetto alquanto diverso rispetto al passato. Non ? sinonimo di ricerca, essa ? il risultato di interazioni tra soggetti eterogenei e non ? solo innovazione tecnologica, ma, oggi, ? anche sociale. Muovendo dalle nuove caratteristiche del concetto di innovazione, l?articolo si occupa dell?analisi dell?innovazione sociale nel contesto dello sviluppo rurale, dove essa ?may be referred to when identifying society?s need for more sustainable production methods, the necessity for collaboration and social learning, and the scope of change needed for revitalising (rural) society? (Bock, 2012). Il reg. (UE) n. 1305/2013 sembra accogliere tutte e tre queste interpretazioni. In particolare si approfondisce la disposizione contenuta nell?art. 35 che incentiva forme di cooperazione tra attori del settore agroalimentare e forestale che intraprendano percorsi (collettivi) di innovazione, analizzando i diversi strumenti (distretti, reti, contratto di rete) che gli Stati membri possono utilizzare per fare innovazione interattiva.

Suggested Citation

  • Pamela Lattanzi & Ilaria Trap?, 2013. "Innovazione sociale e reti di imprese nello sviluppo rurale," AGRICOLTURA ISTITUZIONI MERCATI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(1-2), pages 193-214.
    • Handle: RePEc:fan:aimaim:v:html10.3280/aim2013-001012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=53753&Tipo=ArticoloPDF
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info: https://www.francoangeli.it/DownloadCredit
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bock, Bettina B., 2012. "Social innovation and sustainability; how to disentangle the buzzword and its application in the field of agriculture and rural development," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 114(2), pages 1-7, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pamela Lattanzi, 2014. "Prime note su agricoltura e sussidiariet? orizzontale," AGRICOLTURA ISTITUZIONI MERCATI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(1), pages 23-51.
    2. Gioia Maccioni, 2014. "Responsabilit? sociale d?impresa e sistema agroalimentare: indicazioni strategiche e polimorfismo normativo nell?esperienza europea e nazionale," AGRICOLTURA ISTITUZIONI MERCATI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(2), pages 101-131.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sriroop Chaudhuri & Mimi Roy & Louis M. McDonald & Yves Emendack, 2021. "Reflections on farmers’ social networks: a means for sustainable agricultural development?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 2973-3008, March.
    2. Székely, Vladimír, 2013. "Urban-rural relations as a source of transfer of knowledge: some examples from rural surrounding of Bratislava," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 10, pages 1-21.
    3. Cristina Dalla Torre & Elisa Ravazzoli & Marijke Dijkshoorn-Dekker & Nico Polman & Mariana Melnykovych & Elena Pisani & Francesca Gori & Riccardo Da Re & Kamini Vicentini & Laura Secco, 2020. "The Role of Agency in the Emergence and Development of Social Innovations in Rural Areas. Analysis of Two Cases of Social Farming in Italy and The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-25, May.
    4. Marta Guth & Katarzyna Smędzik-Ambroży & Bazyli Czyżewski & Sebastian Stępień, 2020. "The Economic Sustainability of Farms under Common Agricultural Policy in the European Union Countries," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Antonio Baselice & Maurizio Prosperi & Valentino Marini Govigli & Antonio Lopolito, 2021. "Application of a Comprehensive Methodology for the Evaluation of Social Innovations in Rural Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    6. Paul Swagemakers & Maria Dolores Dominguez Garcia & Johannes S. C. Wiskerke, 2018. "Socially-Inclusive Development and Value Creation: How a Composting Project in Galicia (Spain) ‘Hit the Rocks’," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.
    7. Ana-Maria OPRIA & Ema CORODESCU-ROȘCA & Lucian ROȘU, 2024. "Are LEADER principles achieved in Local Action Groups? A systematic assessment of local representatives' perception," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 15, pages 361-382, June.
    8. Ralph Richter, 2018. "The Janus face of participatory governance: How inclusive governance benefits and limits the social innovativeness of social enterprises," Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity, European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises, vol. 7(1), pages 61-87.
    9. Verena Gramm & Cristina Dalla Torre & Andrea Membretti, 2020. "Farms in Progress-Providing Childcare Services as a Means of Empowering Women Farmers in South Tyrol, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    10. Bótáné Horváth, Noemi & Katonáné Kovács, Judit & Szőke, Szilvia, 2015. "Building an entrepreneurial environment in rural regions: a possible way to develop human and social capital," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 117(01), pages 1-7, April.
    11. Katonáné Kovács, Judit & Navarro, Francisco & Labianca, Marilena, 2016. "Introduction: Human and social capital in rural areas," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 118(01), pages 1-4, April.
    12. Novikova Marina & de Fátima Ferreiro Maria & Stryjakiewicz Tadeusz, 2020. "Local Development Initiatives as Promoters of Social Innovation: Evidence from Two European Rural Regions," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 39(2), pages 43-53, June.
    13. Diogo Soares da Silva & Lummina G. Horlings & Elisabete Figueiredo, 2018. "Citizen Initiatives in the Post-Welfare State," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-21, November.
    14. Kenichiro Onitsuka & Kento Ninomiya & Satoshi Hoshino, 2018. "Potential of 3D Visualization for Collaborative Rural Landscape Planning with Remote Participants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-24, August.
    15. Wiarda, Martijn & van de Kaa, Geerten & Yaghmaei, Emad & Doorn, Neelke, 2021. "A comprehensive appraisal of responsible research and innovation: From roots to leaves," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    16. Baselice, Antonio & Prosperi, Maurizio & Stasi, Antonio & Lombardi, Mariarosaria & Lopolito, Antonio, 2018. "Influence of Socio-economic determinants on the active involvement of agents implementers of Social Innovation: the Case Study of VàZapp' in Apulia region," 2018 Seventh AIEAA Conference, June 14-15, Conegliano, Italy 275241, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    17. Katonáné Kovács, Judit & Varga, Eszter & Nemes, Gusztáv, 2016. "Understanding the process of social innovation in rural regions: some Hungarian case studies," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 118(01), pages 1-8, April.
    18. Živojinović, Ivana & Rogelja, Todora & Weiss, Gerhard & Ludvig, Alice & Secco, Laura, 2023. "Institutional structures impeding forest-based social innovation in Serbia and Slovenia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    19. Néstor Vercher, 2022. "The Role of Actors in Social Innovation in Rural Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-24, May.
    20. Laura Rodrigo & Isabel Ortiz-Marcos & Miguel Palacios, 2024. "A typology of social innovation: A comparative study of clustering methodologies," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 3283-3322, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:aimaim:v:html10.3280/aim2013-001012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rosato (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?IDRivista=122 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.