IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejmejr/24.html

The Salesperson with a Speech Impediment: An Objective Research and Analysis on the Importance of Clarity, Structure and Logic of Arguments

Author

Listed:
  • Martin D Chekuri

    (APMP®, MBA Strategic Management, MSc Psychology, Vice Chairman APMP Hyderabad Chapter | Proposal Writer, Shipley Associates Author NoteThis research paper and its presentation was funded by Shipley Associates and was prepared for presentation at the Inter)

Abstract

There is no sales document as crucial to winning business deals as the business proposal document. We noticed that business proposals try their best to be persuasive, and yet, they do not have the impact they hope to create. In order to understand why we conducted detailed research and found out that customers simply refuse to read some proposals. There are three reasons for this: Logic, Clarity, and Aesthetics. Our research showed that the lack of logic or the presence of logical fallacies account was the reason most often quoted by customers (63% of the times) for not wanting to read the business proposal, followed by clarity, at 29% and aesthetics at 9%. To write this research paper, we’ve focused primarily on understanding logical fallacies, categorizing them and identifying which of them are the most identifiable and which of them are most frequent. We also recommend a systematic way to avoid logical fallacies in proposals.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin D Chekuri, 2019. "The Salesperson with a Speech Impediment: An Objective Research and Analysis on the Importance of Clarity, Structure and Logic of Arguments," European Journal of Marketing and Economics Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 2, January -.
    • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejmejr:24
    DOI: 10.26417/ejme.v1i3.p21-31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejme/article/view/1221
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejme_v2_i1_19/Chekuri.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/ejme.v1i3.p21-31?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Belleflamme, Paul & Omrani, Nessrine & Peitz, Martin, 2015. "The economics of crowdfunding platforms," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 11-28.
    2. Andreia Gabriela Andrei & Adriana Zait, 2018. "The Sharing Economy in Post-communist Societies: Insights from Romania," Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning, in: Elena-Mădălina Vătămănescu & Florina Magdalena Pînzaru (ed.), Knowledge Management in the Sharing Economy, pages 39-55, Springer.
    3. Constantin ANGHELACHE & Olivia Georgiana NITA & Alexandru BADIU, 2016. "Financial Inclusion, Focus on Romanian Migrants and their Families," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 64(1), pages 110-118, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. V. I. Blanutsa, 2022. "Geographic Research of the Platform Economy: Existing and Potential Approaches," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 133-142, June.
    2. Annaleena Parhankangas & Rick Colbourne, 2023. "Indigenous Entrepreneurship and Venture Creation: A Typology of Indigenous Crowdfunding Campaigns," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(5), pages 1617-1659, September.
    3. Baile Lu & Shuai Hao & Michael Pinedo & Yuqian Xu, 2021. "Frontiers in Service Science: Fintech Operations—An Overview of Recent Developments and Future Research Directions," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 19-35, March.
    4. Besancenot, Damien & Vranceanu, Radu, 2018. "Crowdfunding with overenthusiastic investors : a global game model," ESSEC Working Papers WP1802, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    5. Miglo, Anton, 2022. "FinTech Development in Greater Manchester: An Overview," MPRA Paper 111348, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Xin Tang & Haibing Lu & Wei Huang & Shulin Liu, 2023. "Investment decisions and pricing strategies of crowdfunding players: In a two-sided crowdfunding market," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 1209-1240, June.
    7. Thomas Niemand & Sascha Kraus & Martin Angerer & Ferdinand Thies & Alicia Mas-Tur, 2019. "More is not always better—non-linear effects in crowdfunding," International Journal of Quality Innovation, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Swati Gupta & Sahil Raj & Sanjay Gupta & Ajay Sharma, 2023. "Prioritising crowdfunding benefits: a fuzzy-AHP approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 379-403, February.
    9. Xie, Xueyan & Zhu, Xiaoyang, 2022. "FinTech and capital allocation efficiency: Another equity-efficiency dilemma?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    10. Simon Kleinert & Julian Bafera & Diemo Urbig & Christine K. Volkmann, 2022. "Access Denied: How Equity Crowdfunding Platforms Use Quality Signals to Select New Ventures," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(6), pages 1626-1657, November.
    11. Bertsch, Christoph & Hull, Isaiah & Zhang, Xin, 2016. "Fed Liftoff and Subprime Loan Interest Rates: Evidence from the Peer-to-Peer Lending Market," Working Paper Series 319, Sveriges Riksbank (Central Bank of Sweden).
    12. Johannes Wallmeroth & Peter Wirtz & Alexander Peter Groh, 2017. "Institutional Seed Financing, Angel Financing, and Crowdfunding of Entrepreneurial Ventures: A Literature Review," Working Papers hal-01527999, HAL.
    13. Adena, Maja & Huck, Steffen, 2022. "Voluntary ‘donations’ versus reward-oriented ‘contributions’: two experiments on framing in funding mechanisms," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 25(5), pages 1399-1417.
    14. Thomas Clauss & Thomas Niemand & Sascha Kraus & Patrick Schnetzer & Alexander Brem, 2019. "Increasing Crowdfunding Success Through Social Media: The Importance Of Reach And Utilisation In Reward-Based Crowdfunding," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(03), pages 1-30, May.
    15. Bingyou Chen & Yu Luo & Jieni Li & Yujian Li & Ying Liu & Fan Yang & Junge Bo & Yanan Qiao, 2023. "Blockchain-based Decentralized Co-governance: Innovations and Solutions for Sustainable Crowdfunding," Papers 2306.00869, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    16. Francis Kwaku Kuma & Mohd Effandi Bin Yusoff & Paul Kwasi Apreku-Djan, 2024. "A Synthesis of Crowdfunding Concepts in the Ghanaian Context: Crowdfunding Information Challenges in Ghana," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 435-460, March.
    17. Olena Havrylchyk, 2018. "Regulatory framework for the loan-based crowdfunding platforms," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1513, OECD Publishing.
    18. Georgiana-Loredana Schipor (Frecea), 2020. "Exploring the Crowdfunding Revolution: Reaching the Right Goal," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 1029-1036, August.
    19. Ehsan Bolandifar & Zhong Chen & Panos Kouvelis & Weihua Zhou, 2023. "Quality Signaling Through Crowdfunding Pricing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 668-685, March.
    20. Hadar Gafni & Marek Hudon & Anaïs Périlleux, 2021. "Business or Basic Needs? The Impact of Loan Purpose on Social Crowdfunding Platforms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(4), pages 777-793, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejmejr:24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.org/index.php/ejme .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.