IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejesjr/222.html

Geographical Indications- a marketing strategy tool for small farms in Albania

Author

Listed:
  • Manuela Mece

    (Albanian University, Faculty of Applied and Economic Sciences, Albania)

Abstract

GIs offer a unique marketing tool for producers, differentiating their products from generic counterparts, and can enhance the market position of producers by capitalizing on the reputation and distinctiveness associated with a specific geographic region. Geographical Indication (GI) can be used as a strategy for marketing the product and the territory. It creates synergy with the preservation of cultural heritage; with consumers' value attributed to the specific qualities of that product; with the economic development and the livelihoods of rural communities. Balkan Countries are making serious efforts for creating their competitive advantage whereas Albania is still in the initial steps. One product that is expected to create synergy with the Tourism industry as a potential GI in Albania is the Winery sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Manuela Mece, 2023. "Geographical Indications- a marketing strategy tool for small farms in Albania," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 9(1), pages 114-121, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejesjr:222
    DOI: 10.26417/ejes.v4i2.p73-82
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mentisia.org/files/articles/ejes_v9_i1_23/Mece.html
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/ejes.v4i2.p73-82?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carcello, Jv & Palmrose, Zv, 1994. "Auditor Litigation And Modified Reporting On Bankrupt Clients," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32, pages 1-30.
    2. Grant Gay & Peter Schelluch & Ian Reid, 1997. "Users' Perceptions of the Auditing Responsibilities for the Prevention, Detection and Reporting of Fraud, Other Illegal Acts and Error," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 7(13), pages 51-61, May.
    3. Richard B. Carter & Roger D. Stover, 1991. "Management Ownership and Firm Compensation Policy: Evidence From Converting Savings and Loan Associations," Financial Management, Financial Management Association, vol. 20(4), Winter.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salem Lotfi Boumediene, 2014. "Detection And Prediction Of Managerial Fraud In The Financial Statements Of Tunisian Banks," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 6(2), pages 1-10.
    2. Şerafettin SEVİM & Birol YILDIZ & Nilüfer DALKILIÇ, 2016. "Risk Assessment for Accounting Professional Liability Insurance," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 24(29).
    3. Dan Åžtirbu & Maria Moraru & Nicoleta Farcane & Rodica Blidisel & Adina Popa, 2009. "Fraud And Error. Auditors' Responsibility Levels," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(11), pages 1-5.
    4. Waymond Rodgers & Andrés Guiral & José Gonzalo, 2009. "Different Pathways that Suggest Whether Auditors’ Going Concern Opinions are Ethically Based," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 86(3), pages 347-361, May.
    5. repec:bof:bofrdp:urn:nbn:fi:bof-201508131351 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Pablo de Llano Monelos & Manuel Rodríguez López & Carlos Piñeiro Sánchez, 2013. "Bankruptcy Prediction Models in Galician companies. Application of Parametric Methodologies and Artificial Intelligence," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 117-136.
    7. Muhammad Farhan Malik & Yuan George Shan & Jamie Yixing Tong, 2022. "Do auditors price litigious tone?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(S1), pages 1715-1760, April.
    8. Borochin, Paul & Knopf, John D., 2021. "Do managers seek control and entrenchment?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    9. Sattar A. Mansi & William F. Maxwell & Darius P. Miller, 2004. "Does Auditor Quality and Tenure Matter to Investors? Evidence from the Bond Market," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(4), pages 755-793, September.
    10. Muhammad Jahangir Ali & Balasingham Balachandran & Huu Nhan Duong & Premkanth Puwanenthiren & Michael Theobald, 2025. "Does options trading affect audit pricing?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 609-651, February.
    11. Karla M. Johnstone & Jean C. Bedard, 2004. "Audit Firm Portfolio Management Decisions," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(4), pages 659-690, September.
    12. Benito Arrunada, 2000. "Audit quality: attributes, private safeguards and the role of regulation," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 205-224.
    13. Richard Chung & Michael Firth & Jeong-Bon Kim, 2003. "Auditor conservatism and reported earnings," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 19-32.
    14. Khondaker Mizanur Rahman & Marc Bremer, 2016. "Effective Corporate Governance and Financial Reporting in Japan," Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance (AAMJAF), Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, vol. 12(Suppl. 1), pages 1-93–122.
    15. Das, Abhijit & Chong, Vincent K. & Masschelein, Stijn & Wang, Isabel Z. & Woodliff, David R., 2025. "The effects of performance-based profit-sharing schemes and client pressure on auditors' pre-negotiation judgments," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    16. Emiliano Ruiz-Barbadillo & Nieves Gomez-Aguilar & Cristina De Fuentes-Barbera & Maria Antonia Garcia-Benau, 2004. "Audit quality and the going-concern decision-making process: Spanish evidence," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 597-620.
    17. Bailey, Wendy J. & Sawers, Kimberly M., 2018. "Moving toward a principle-based approach to U.S. accounting standard setting: A demand for procedural justice and accounting reform," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1-13.
    18. Piet Sercu & Heidi Bauwhede & Marleen Willekens, 2006. "Post-Enron Implicit Audit Reporting Standards: Sifting through the Evidence," De Economist, Springer, vol. 154(3), pages 389-403, September.
    19. Daniel Aobdia & Luminita Enache & Anup Srivastava, 2021. "Changes in Big N auditors’ client selection and retention strategies over time," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 715-754, February.
    20. Peecher, Mark E. & Solomon, Ira & Trotman, Ken T., 2013. "An accountability framework for financial statement auditors and related research questions," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 596-620.
    21. Sanoran, Kanyarat (Lek), 2018. "Auditors’ going concern reporting accuracy during and after the global financial crisis," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 164-178.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejesjr:222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mentisia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mentisia.org/index.php/ejes .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.