IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejesjr/186.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stock Allocation in Turkish Capital Markets: Industry and Firm Level Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Ozlem KUTLU FURTUNA

    (PhD Center for Finance, Governance and Sustainability (CFGS), Business Administration Department, Yildiz Technical University, Turkey)

Abstract

Investors’ trading patterns has been an intensively researched topic in emerging markets depending on their significant role and power in the capital markets. This paper provides what global and domestic factors have driven the stock allocation of investors in Turkey and how has the crisis changed investors’ attitude toward stock allocation between the years 2006 and 2016. Year-end stock allocation data are obtained from the Central Securities Depository Institution of Turkey. Stock allocation has been investigated mainly in terms of the domestic and foreign stock investments. A detailed classification of investors as individual and institutional investors in terms of investment funds, corporate and investment trusts with firm and industry levels has also been evaluated. The variations on stock allocation has been examined in BIST Industrials, Financials and Services Industries. Additionally, this paper gives an insight about the firm and industry level stock allocation in Turkish Capital Markets considering the responsible stockholders. Corporate governance practices are considered to be strengthened with the growing role of institutional investors in the financial system, which provide insights about the investor profile of BIST Corporate Governance Index in the related period.

Suggested Citation

  • Ozlem KUTLU FURTUNA, 2017. "Stock Allocation in Turkish Capital Markets: Industry and Firm Level Perspectives," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 3, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejesjr:186
    DOI: 10.26417/ejes.v9i1.p100-106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejes/article/view/5384
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejes_v3_i3_17/Ozlem.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/ejes.v9i1.p100-106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akkermans, Henk & Bogerd, Paul & van Doremalen, Jan, 2004. "Travail, transparency and trust: A case study of computer-supported collaborative supply chain planning in high-tech electronics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(2), pages 445-456, March.
    2. Esmaeili, M. & Zeephongsekul, P., 2010. "Seller-buyer models of supply chain management with an asymmetric information structure," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 146-154, January.
    3. Alexander Sarris & Piero Conforti & Adam Prakash, 2011. "The use of organized commodity markets to manage food import price instability and risk," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 42(1), pages 47-64, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Nagurney & Dong Li, 2014. "Equilibria and dynamics of supply chain network competition with information asymmetry in quality and minimum quality standards," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 285-315, July.
    2. Sohn, So Young & Lim, Michael, 2008. "The effect of forecasting and information sharing in SCM for multi-generation products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 276-287, April.
    3. Ni Du & Qinglan Han, 2018. "Pricing and Service Quality Guarantee Decisions in Logistics Service Supply Chain with Fairness Concern," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 35(05), pages 1-41, October.
    4. Dekkers, Rob & de Boer, Ronald & Gelsomino, Luca Mattia & de Goeij, Christiaan & Steeman, Michiel & Zhou, Qijun & Sinclair, Scott & Souter, Victoria, 2020. "Evaluating theoretical conceptualisations for supply chain and finance integration: A Scottish focus group," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    5. Cao, Qing & Baker, Jeff & Schniederjans, Dara, 2014. "Bullwhip effect reduction and improved business performance through guanxi: An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 217-230.
    6. Ofentse, Goetswamang Phankie, 2022. "Evaluation of the prospects of hedging Botswana's maize prices against the Johannesburg Stock Exchange Commodity Market Derivative," Research Theses 334751, Collaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    7. Rahimi-Ghahroodi, S. & Al Hanbali, A. & Zijm, W.H.M. & Timmer, J.B., 2020. "Multi-resource emergency supply contracts with asymmetric information in the after-sales services," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    8. Ton de Kok & Fred Janssen & Jan van Doremalen & Erik van Wachem & Mathieu Clerkx & Winfried Peeters, 2005. "Philips Electronics Synchronizes Its Supply Chain to End the Bullwhip Effect," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 37-48, February.
    9. Kampstra, R.P. & Ashayeri, J. & Gattorna, J., 2006. "Realities of Supply Chain Collaboration," Other publications TiSEM d3f62a32-db8b-43d2-b44f-9, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Xu Zhang & Panlop Zeephongsekul & Maryam Esmaeili, 2012. "Seller ¨C Buyer Supply Chain Games Where Shortage Are Permitted," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(4), pages 1-14, November.
    11. He, Qile & Ghobadian, Abby & Gallear, David, 2013. "Knowledge acquisition in supply chain partnerships: The role of power," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 605-618.
    12. Delphine Boutin, 2011. "D’une crise à l’autre : Mesurer l’impact des prix alimentaires sur la pauvreté," Larefi Working Papers 1106, Larefi, Université Bordeaux 4.
    13. Bermpei, Theodora & Karadimitropoulou, Aikaterini & Triantafyllou, Athanasios & Alshalahi, Jebreel, 2023. "Does commodity price uncertainty matter for the cost of credit? Evidence from developing and advanced economies," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 29(C).
    14. Muhammad Khan & Hee Yong Lee & Jung Han Bae, 2019. "The Role of Transparency in Humanitarian Logistics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-27, April.
    15. Montecchi, Matteo & Plangger, Kirk & West, Douglas C., 2021. "Supply chain transparency: A bibliometric review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    16. C.K. Ambilikumar & M. Bhasi & G. Madhu, 2015. "Modelling and analysis of coordination of a three-level supply chain with use of price discount along with delay in payment," International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 71-91.
    17. J. Zambujal-Oliveira, 2021. "Supply Chain Innovation Research: A Conceptual Approach of Information Management with Game Theory," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 377-394, April.
    18. Geng, Wei & Qiu, Minmin & Zhao, Xiaobo, 2010. "An inventory system with single distributor and multiple retailers: Operating scenarios and performance comparison," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 434-444, November.
    19. Joanna Radomska & Aleksandra Szpulak & Przemysław Wołczek, 2023. "A multi-item scale for open strategy measurement," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 50(1), pages 51-71, March.
    20. Wang Lina & Poelmans Stephen & Milis Koen, 2020. "SCM Implementation Decisions Under Asymmetric Information: An Agency Approach," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 8(5), pages 447-457, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejesjr:186. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Revistia Research and Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://revistia.com/index.php/ejes .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.