IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eur/ejefjr/49.html

Statistical Analysis and Evaluation of Changing Trend of Woman Employment in Turkey in Globalization Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Necati Kayhan

    (KTO University of Karatay)

Abstract

Women in the status of a milestone in a family, who can also become the mother, are given more responsibility compared to man. In this sense, working woman has some very crucial responsibilities both individually and socially and economically. Besides these roles, the involvement of women comprising almost half of the population in working life actively and contribute to production is of importance in the development of country and fight against poverty. Therefore, in the current time, a great many incentives have been given in socio-economic sense recently in order to increase the woman employment in Turkey, which is much behind OECD data, to the desired level. However, even though the activity in woman employment has partly improved quantitatively in recent years despite these measures, necessary improvement in providing them a proper job qualitatively have not been obtained. Some reasons for this could be summed as follows: gender discrimination, inadequate growth, scarcity in proper job, lack of innovative and entrepreneurial education model for labour market, rapid urbanization, qualitative labour force, job experience etc. Women could only find an opportunity for a job in atypical working forms such as easiest one, without a union, without protection, demanding a cheap labour force with sub-employers. In this sense, in the current study that was carried out to describe women employment in Turkey, it was aimed to investigate involvement in labour force, working types and conditions. The method to be used in the study was planned as determining and evaluating the condition in the working life of women and changing trend in the country with a basis of examining current national and international studies and statistical data with regard to woman employment in the last five years.

Suggested Citation

  • Necati Kayhan, 2021. "Statistical Analysis and Evaluation of Changing Trend of Woman Employment in Turkey in Globalization Conditions," European Journal of Engineering and Formal Sciences Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 4(2), pages 68-81, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:eur:ejefjr:49
    DOI: 10.26417/ejms.v6i2.p281-288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mentisia.org/files/articles/ejfe_v4_i2_21/Kayhan.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://mentisia.org/files/articles/ejfe_v4_i2_21/Kayhan.html
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26417/ejms.v6i2.p281-288?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rossi, Federica & Rosli, Ainurul & Yip, Nick, 2017. "Academic engagement as knowledge co-production and implications for impact: Evidence from Knowledge Transfer Partnerships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1-9.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. De Silva, Muthu & Rossi, Federica & Yip, Nick K.T. & Rosli, Ainurul, 2021. "Does affective evaluation matter for the success of university-industry collaborations? A sentiment analysis of university-industry collaborative project reports," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    2. Tolin, Giovanni & Piccaluga, Andrea, 2025. "Commercializing technology from university-industry collaborations: A configurational perspective on organizational factors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Anna Jonsson & Maria Grafström & Mikael Klintman, 2022. "Unboxing knowledge in collaboration between academia and society: A story about conceptions and epistemic uncertainty [De-essentializing the Knowledge Intensive Firm: Reflections on Skeptical Research Going against the Mainstream]," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(4), pages 583-597.
    4. Cristina Bianca Pocol & Liana Stanca & Dan-Cristian Dabija & Veronica Câmpian & Sergiu Mișcoiu & Ioana Delia Pop, 2023. "A QCA Analysis of Knowledge Co-Creation Based on University–Industry Relationships," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Binod Prasad Parajuli & Prakash Khadka & Preshika Baskota & Puja Shakya & Wei Liu & Uttam Pudasaini & Roniksh B.C. & Jonathan D. Paul & Wouter Buytaert & Sumit Vij, 2020. "An Open Data and Citizen Science Approach to Building Resilience to Natural Hazards in a Data-Scarce Remote Mountainous Part of Nepal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-13, November.
    6. Nast, Carolin & Llopis, Oscar & Yankova, Dima & D'Este, Pablo, 2025. "Sourcing insights elsewhere: The positive influence of academic engagement on scientific impact," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    7. Olszewski Marcin, 2021. "Effect of Cooperation with Universities on the Innovativeness of Tourism Enterprises," Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, Paradigm, vol. 28(1), pages 30-34, March.
    8. repec:eur:ejfejr:51 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. David Sarpong & Dirk Meissner & Gustavo Hermínio Salati Marcondes de Moraes & Silvio Vismara, 2026. "The impact of university-industry engagement and the rise of competency transfer partnerships," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 637-652, April.
    10. Tero Rantala & Minna Saunila & Juhani Ukko & Satu Rinkinen, 2026. "SMEs as cutting-edge research utilizers: the strategies, motivations, and barriers of forerunners," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 854-879, April.
    11. Zhe Cao & Lin Zhang & Zelin Wang & Chen Li & Gunnar Sivertsen, 2025. "How does scientific research generate impact beyond academia? Cross-disciplinary comparison based on REF impact cases," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Loureiro, Sandra Maria Correia & Romero, Jaime & Bilro, Ricardo Godinho, 2020. "Stakeholder engagement in co-creation processes for innovation: A systematic literature review and case study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 388-409.
    13. Zhao, Hongye & Zhao, Yi & Zhang, Chengzhi, 2026. "Quantifying the knowledge proximity between academic and industry research: An entity and semantic perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    14. Lorenzo Compagnucci & Francesca Spigarelli & Francesco Perugini & Donato Iacobucci & Fabrizio Cobis, 2026. "Does the hub and spoke model matter for university-industry engagement in innovation ecosystems?," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 243-274, February.
    15. S. A. M. Dolmans & B. Walrave & S. Read & N. Stijn, 2022. "Knowledge transfer to industry: how academic researchers learn to become boundary spanners during academic engagement," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 1422-1450, October.
    16. Kati Suomi & Päivikki Kuoppakangas & Jari Stenvall & Elias Pekkola & Jussi Kivistö, 2019. "Revisiting “the shotgun wedding of industry and academia”—empirical evidence from Finland," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 16(1), pages 81-102, March.
    17. Rossi, Federica & Sengupta, Abhijit, 2022. "Implementing strategic changes in universities’ knowledge exchange profiles: The role and nature of managerial interventions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 874-887.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eur:ejefjr:49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mentisia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mentisia.org/index.php/ejfe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.