IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ete/revbec/20080202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lot sizing in stochastic flowshops. Striking the balance between capacity and flow

Author

Listed:
  • I. Van Nieuwenhuyse

Abstract

The performance of a real-life production system (as measured by, for instance, the average flow time of parts or the average work-in-process level) is impacted by a range of managerial decisions, among which the product mix being produced in the shop, the layout of the shop, and the lot sizing policies (also called batching policies) used on the shop floor. Insights on the relationship between these (often deliberate) choices and the resulting performance have high managerial relevance. The impact of lot sizing policies on flow times is particularly interesting to analyze: by setting lot sizes in a deliberate way, managers can obtain flow time improvements without radical interventions in the system, and without large financial investments. Two types of lot sizing decisions can be distinguished: process lots and transfer lots. As discussed in this paper, a well-considered choice of both enables management to strike a balance between capacity considerations and flow considerations. We discuss some essential differences in the rationale underlying the use of process versus transfer lots, and shed light on the trade-offs inherent in both types of lot sizing decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • I. Van Nieuwenhuyse, 2008. "Lot sizing in stochastic flowshops. Striking the balance between capacity and flow," Review of Business and Economic Literature, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Review of Business and Economic Literature, vol. 0(2), pages 147-160.
    • Handle: RePEc:ete:revbec:20080202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/123456789/196317/2/2008-2+-+Van+Nieuwenhuyse.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marc R. Lambrecht & Philip L. Ivens & Nico J. Vandaele, 1998. "ACLIPS: A Capacity and Lead Time Integrated Procedure for Scheduling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(11-Part-1), pages 1548-1561, November.
    2. VANDAELE, Nico & VAN NIEUWENHUYSE, Inneke, 2004. "Determining the optimal number of sublots in a single-product, deterministic flow shop with overlapping operations," LIDAM Reprints CORE 1814, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    3. Van Nieuwenhuyse, Inneke & Vandaele, Nico & Rajaram, Kumar & Karmarkar, Uday S., 2007. "Buffer sizing in multi-product multi-reactor batch processes: Impact of allocation and campaign sizing policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(2), pages 424-443, June.
    4. Ramasesh, Ranga V. & Fu, Haizhen & Fong, Duncan K. H. & Hayya, Jack C., 2000. "Lot streaming in multistage production systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 199-211, July.
    5. Uday S. Karmarkar, 1987. "Lot Sizes, Lead Times and In-Process Inventories," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 409-418, March.
    6. Van Nieuwenhuyse, Inneke & Vandaele, Nico, 2004. "Determining the optimal number of sublots in a single-product, deterministic flow shop with overlapping operations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 221-239, December.
    7. Van Nieuwenhuyse, Inneke & Vandaele, Nico, 2006. "The impact of delivery lot splitting on delivery reliability in a two-stage supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 694-708, December.
    8. Vandaele, Nico & Van Nieuwenhuyse, Inneke & Cupers, Sascha, 2003. "Optimal grouping for a nuclear magnetic resonance scanner by means of an open queueing model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(1), pages 181-192, November.
    9. Sen, Alper & Topaloglu, Engin & Benli, Omer S., 1998. "Optimal streaming of a single job in a two-stage flow shop," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(1), pages 42-62, October.
    10. Baker, KR & Jia, D, 1993. "A comparative study of lot streaming procedures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 561-566, September.
    11. VANDAELE, Nico & AN NIEUWENHUYSE, Inneke & CUPERS, Sascha, 2003. "Optimal grouping for a nuclear magnetic resonance scanner by means of an open queueing model," LIDAM Reprints CORE 1813, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    12. T.C.E. Cheng & B.M.T. Lin & A. Toker, 2000. "Makespan minimization in the two‐machine flowshop batch scheduling problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(2), pages 128-144, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kris Lieckens & Nico Vandaele, 2016. "Differential evolution to solve the lot size problem in stochastic supply chain management systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 242(2), pages 239-263, July.
    2. Van Nieuwenhuyse, Inneke & Vandaele, Nico, 2006. "The impact of delivery lot splitting on delivery reliability in a two-stage supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 694-708, December.
    3. S. Creemers & M. Lambrecht & N. Vandaele, 2007. "Queueing Models in Healthcare," Review of Business and Economic Literature, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Review of Business and Economic Literature, vol. 0(3), pages 471-498.
    4. D Biskup & M Feldmann, 2006. "Lot streaming with variable sublots: an integer programming formulation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(3), pages 296-303, March.
    5. Van Nieuwenhuyse, Inneke & Vandaele, Nico & Rajaram, Kumar & Karmarkar, Uday S., 2007. "Buffer sizing in multi-product multi-reactor batch processes: Impact of allocation and campaign sizing policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(2), pages 424-443, June.
    6. Jalali, Hamed & Carmen, Raïsa & Van Nieuwenhuyse, Inneke & Boute, Robert, 2019. "Quality and pricing decisions in production/inventory systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 195-206.
    7. Chiu, Huan Neng & Chang, Jen Huei, 2005. "Cost models for lot streaming in a multistage flow shop," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 435-450, October.
    8. Van Nieuwenhuyse, Inneke & Vandaele, Nico, 2004. "Determining the optimal number of sublots in a single-product, deterministic flow shop with overlapping operations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 221-239, December.
    9. Goyal, Suresh Kumar & Chang, Chun-Tao, 2009. "Optimal ordering and transfer policy for an inventory with stock dependent demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(1), pages 177-185, July.
    10. Zhang, Wei & Yin, Changyu & Liu, Jiyin & Linn, Richard J., 2005. "Multi-job lot streaming to minimize the mean completion time in m-1 hybrid flowshops," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 189-200, May.
    11. Vandaele, Nico & Van Nieuwenhuyse, Inneke & Cupers, Sascha, 2003. "Optimal grouping for a nuclear magnetic resonance scanner by means of an open queueing model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(1), pages 181-192, November.
    12. Sarin, Subhash C. & Kalir, Adar A. & Chen, Ming, 2008. "A single-lot, unified cost-based flow shop lot-streaming problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 413-424, May.
    13. Jans, R.F. & Degraeve, Z., 2005. "Modeling Industrial Lot Sizing Problems: A Review," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2005-049-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    14. Germs, Remco & Van Foreest, Nicky D., 2011. "Admission policies for the customized stochastic lot scheduling problem with strict due-dates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(2), pages 375-383, September.
    15. Schütz, Hans-Jörg & Kolisch, Rainer, 2012. "Approximate dynamic programming for capacity allocation in the service industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 239-250.
    16. Ahmadi-Javid, Amir & Jalali, Zahra & Klassen, Kenneth J, 2017. "Outpatient appointment systems in healthcare: A review of optimization studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 3-34.
    17. Tzu-Li Chen & Chen-Yang Cheng & Yi-Han Chou, 2020. "Multi-objective genetic algorithm for energy-efficient hybrid flow shop scheduling with lot streaming," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 813-836, July.
    18. Amorim, P. & Belo-Filho, M.A.F. & Toledo, F.M.B. & Almeder, C. & Almada-Lobo, B., 2013. "Lot sizing versus batching in the production and distribution planning of perishable goods," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 208-218.
    19. Shah, Purvi, 2020. "Managing customer reactions to brand deletion in B2B and B2C contexts," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    20. Debabrata Dey & Atanu Lahiri & Guoying Zhang, 2015. "Optimal Policies for Security Patch Management," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 462-477, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ete:revbec:20080202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: library EBIB (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fekulbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.