IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eph/journl/v5y2010i1n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Board composition, process, and activism: evidence within American firms

Author

Listed:
  • Scott SCARBOROUGH

    (University of Toledo, USA)

  • Jeffrey J. HAYNIE

    (Auburn University, USA)

  • Christopher SHOOK

    (Auburn University, USA)

Abstract

This study provided an empirical test of the effects of compositional and process variables on board activism. The attributes examined were functional area knowledge, independence, duality, and effort norms. The findings from this study provided support for the positive relationships between both functional area knowledge and effort norms and board activism. The strong relationship between effort norms and activism indicates the importance of process variables in board research and the need for additional research using process variables in a board context giving further insight into board activism and governance. Additionally, the relationship between functional area knowledge and board activism highlights how boards ability to meet cognitive demands is critical in board performance. These results as well as future research directions are examined in the discussion.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott SCARBOROUGH & Jeffrey J. HAYNIE & Christopher SHOOK, 2010. "Board composition, process, and activism: evidence within American firms," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 5(1), Spring.
  • Handle: RePEc:eph:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:1:n:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.managementmarketing.ro/pdf/articole/172.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Constantin BRATIANU & Georgiana Victoria BALANESCU, 2008. "Vision, mission and corporate values. A comparative analysis of the top 50 U.S. companies," Management & Marketing, Economic Publishing House, vol. 3(3), Autumn.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eph:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:1:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Simona Vasilache). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.