The Deadlock that never Happened: the Impact of Enlargement on the Common Foreign and Security Policy Council Working Groups
Contrary to some previous assumptions, the enlargement did not halt the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) decision-making process in a substantial way. Rather it changed the dynamics within the working environment, preserving the importance of consensus-building practices in the Council working groups. The aim of this article is twofold. First, it tracks the changes that the recent enlargement caused in the working practices of the Council working groups. It also attempts to assess the adaptation processes of the new member states to the work in the Council working groups and pinpoint the main challenges that their administrative systems were faced with.
Volume (Year): 6 (2007)
Issue (Month): March ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://eper.htw-berlin.de/|
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Checkel, Jeffrey T., 2005. "International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 59(04), pages 801-826, October.
- Beyers, Jan, 2005. "Multiple Embeddedness and Socialization in Europe: The Case of Council Officials," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 59(04), pages 899-936, October.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epe:journl:v:6:y:2007:i:march:p:4-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Prof.Dr.Sebastian Dullien)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.