IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/ijsepp/v36y2009i7p716-742.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The transition process from alternative theoretical prisms: A comparative analysis of Eastern European and former Soviet Block economies

Author

Listed:
  • Morris Altman

Abstract

Purpose - The paper aims to examine the reality of, and, conditions for economic growth for former Soviet and Soviet Block economies with special attention to Ukraine and the Russian Federation. Many of these economies' transition from “Communism” remain plagued by problems of institutional design and outcomes characterized by high levels of corruption and low levels of accountability and transparency. The purpose of this paper is to analyze aspects of these socio-economic realities in the context of contemporary economic theory and ongoing revisions to it. Design/methodology/approach - The type of economic theory used to assess issues of transition has significant implications for public policy. Conventional economic theory has traditionally focused on secure private property rights, competitive markets, inclusive of “flexible” labor markets, as the necessary if not the sufficient conditions to successfully and quickly transition from command style to market economies. Little attention is paid to the details of institutional design. The paper applies a behavioral-institutional analytical framework to analyze important aspects of failures and successes in transition economies using both economic and governance data sets. Findings - The paper finds that traditional measures of economic freedom are far from sufficient to generate economic growth. Accountability and transparency in governance structures is also required. Economic failure and success are closely connected with overall performance in socio-economic governance. Also an unnecessary emphasis on low wages, highly constrained social safety nets and labor market policy impedes successful growth and development. Practical implications - Transition economies' economic performance can be significantly enhanced through improvements in institutional design that facilitates the evolution of high-wage market economies. The market in and of itself does not suffice to generate successful transitions from command to vibrant market economies. Originality/value - This paper provides an original exposé and analysis of transition economies from a behavioral-institutionalist perspective, with important public policy implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Morris Altman, 2009. "The transition process from alternative theoretical prisms: A comparative analysis of Eastern European and former Soviet Block economies," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 36(7), pages 716-742, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:ijsepp:v:36:y:2009:i:7:p:716-742
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/03068290910963671?utm_campaign=RePEc&WT.mc_id=RePEc
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morris Altman, 2008. "How much economic freedom is necessary for economic growth? Theory and evidence," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20.
    2. Akerlof, George A, 1984. "Gift Exchange and Efficiency-Wage Theory: Four Views," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 74(2), pages 79-83, May.
    3. repec:mes:challe:v:41:y:1998:i:1:p:91-104 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Leibenstein, Harvey, 1979. "A Branch of Economics is Missing: Micro-Micro Theory," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 17(2), pages 477-502, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijsepp:v:36:y:2009:i:7:p:716-742. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Virginia Chapman). General contact details of provider: http://www.emeraldinsight.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.