IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v179y2026ics0967070x25004937.html

Performance evaluation of major world container ports in the post-pandemic era: The 6th generation ports model with smart ports

Author

Listed:
  • Song, Zhao-Yu
  • Pettit, Stephen
  • Wang, Yingli
  • Ye, Guanqiong
  • Lin, Cheng-Wei

Abstract

The port sector faces both challenges and opportunities in digital transformation and decarbonization in the post-pandemic era. To address these issues, the Sixth Generation Port (6 GP) model with smart ports comprising six aspects and 14 criteria was proposed, iteratively refined, and validated. In order to extend the test scope and assess the applicability of the 6 GP model, this study aims to evaluate the performance of major world container ports, namely the Port of Singapore, Shanghai, Busan, Hong Kong, and Rotterdam, by applying the 6 GP model with smart ports. An innovative hybrid methodology integrating CFPR, MOORA, and VIKOR was employed to explore the business needs and development priorities of port stakeholders and to assess each port's performance with reference to the 6 GP model. The test results indicate that the Port of Singapore, Rotterdam, and Shanghai performanc, with Asian container ports achieved better performance in "service" and "smart port governance system and policy". Specifically, Shanghai has emphasized automation optimization to facilitate the seamless cargo and vessel flows, while Rotterdam achieved significant performance in digitalization and decarbonization by fostering a smart port–city symbiosis. The contribution of this study lies in theoretical, methodological, and empirical aspects. i) Theoretically, it validates the applicability of the 6 GP model, enriching the existing literature on Port Devolution Theory by integrating digitalization and decarbonization into the 6 GP model; ii) Methodologically, it applies a novel hybrid CFPR–MOORA–VIKOR framework to enhance multi-criteria decision-making in port studies; iii) Empirically, it offers a comparative evaluation of container ports in both Asia and Europe, providing actionable insights for policymakers and port managers, and advocates collaborative action among different stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Song, Zhao-Yu & Pettit, Stephen & Wang, Yingli & Ye, Guanqiong & Lin, Cheng-Wei, 2026. "Performance evaluation of major world container ports in the post-pandemic era: The 6th generation ports model with smart ports," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:179:y:2026:i:c:s0967070x25004937
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103950
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25004937
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103950?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Tae-Woo Lee & Jasmine Siu Lee Lam, 2016. "Developing the Fifth Generation Ports Model," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Paul Tae-Woo Lee & Kevin Cullinane (ed.), Dynamic Shipping and Port Development in the Globalized Economy, chapter 8, pages 186-210, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Song, Zhao-Yu & Lin, Cheng-Wei & Feng, Xuehao & Lee, Paul Tae-Woo, 2024. "An empirical study of the performance of the sixth generation ports model with smart ports with reference to major container ports in mainland China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    3. Opricovic, Serafim & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2004. "Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(2), pages 445-455, July.
    4. Pal Singh, Satender & Adhikari, Arnab & Majumdar, Adrija & Bisi, Arnab, 2022. "Does service quality influence operational and financial performance of third party logistics service providers? A mixed multi criteria decision making -text mining-based investigation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    5. Herrera-Viedma, E. & Herrera, F. & Chiclana, F. & Luque, M., 2004. "Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(1), pages 98-109, April.
    6. Kuo, Ming-Shin, 2011. "A novel interval-valued fuzzy MCDM method for improving airlines’ service quality in Chinese cross-strait airlines," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 1177-1193.
    7. A. K. C. Beresford & B. M. Gardner & S. J. Pettit & A. Naniopoulos & C. F. Wooldridge, 2004. "The UNCTAD and WORKPORT models of port development: evolution or revolution?," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 93-107, April.
    8. S. J. Pettit & A. K. C. Beresford, 2009. "Port development: from gateways to logistics hubs," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 253-267, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Song, Zhao-Yu & Lin, Cheng-Wei & Feng, Xuehao & Lee, Paul Tae-Woo, 2024. "An empirical study of the performance of the sixth generation ports model with smart ports with reference to major container ports in mainland China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    2. Haji Vahabzadeh, Ali & Asiaei, Arash & Zailani, Suhaiza, 2015. "Reprint of “Green decision-making model in reverse logistics using FUZZY-VIKOR method”," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PB), pages 334-347.
    3. Celik, Erkan & Aydin, Nezir & Gumus, Alev Taskin, 2014. "A multiattribute customer satisfaction evaluation approach for rail transit network: A real case study for Istanbul, Turkey," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 283-293.
    4. Haji Vahabzadeh, Ali & Asiaei, Arash & Zailani, Suhaiza, 2015. "Green decision-making model in reverse logistics using FUZZY-VIKOR method," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 125-138.
    5. Chui-Hua Liu & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng & Po-Yen Lee, 2019. "Combined CFPR and VIKOR Model for Enhancing the Competencies of Domestic Chain Hotel Groups," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(03), pages 901-927, May.
    6. Xie, Haotian & Li, Yi & Pu, Yang & Zhang, Chen & Huang, Junlin, 2024. "Evaluating airline service quality through a comprehensive text-mining and multi-criteria decision-making analysis," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    7. Olga Porro & Francesc Pardo-Bosch & Núria Agell & Mónica Sánchez, 2020. "Understanding Location Decisions of Energy Multinational Enterprises within the European Smart Cities’ Context: An Integrated AHP and Extended Fuzzy Linguistic TOPSIS Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-29, May.
    8. Juan de Oña & Rocio de Oña, 2015. "Quality of Service in Public Transport Based on Customer Satisfaction Surveys: A Review and Assessment of Methodological Approaches," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 605-622, August.
    9. Wu, Chong & Li, Ruxuan & Barnes, David & Shao, Yifan, 2025. "Service supplier portfolio optimization approach for multi-channel digital marketing considering promotional capacity forecasts and channel synergies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    10. Monios, Jason & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2013. "The role of intermodal transport in port regionalisation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 161-172.
    11. Bice Cavallo, 2019. "Coherent weights for pairwise comparison matrices and a mixed-integer linear programming problem," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 75(1), pages 143-161, September.
    12. Yi Peng, 2015. "Regional earthquake vulnerability assessment using a combination of MCDM methods," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 234(1), pages 95-110, November.
    13. Zheng, Guozhong & Wang, Xiao, 2020. "The comprehensive evaluation of renewable energy system schemes in tourist resorts based on VIKOR method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    14. Chai, Naijie & Zhou, Wenliang & Hu, Xinlei, 2022. "Safety evaluation of urban rail transit operation considering uncertainty and risk preference: A case study in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 267-288.
    15. Milad Zamanifar & Seyed Mohammad Seyedhoseyni, 2017. "Recovery planning model for roadways network after natural hazards," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 87(2), pages 699-716, June.
    16. Pedro Ponce & Citlaly Pérez & Aminah Robinson Fayek & Arturo Molina, 2022. "Solar Energy Implementation in Manufacturing Industry Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Fuzzy TOPSIS and S4 Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-19, November.
    17. Wenyao Niu & Yuan Rong & Liying Yu & Lu Huang, 2022. "A Novel Hybrid Group Decision Making Approach Based on EDAS and Regret Theory under a Fermatean Cubic Fuzzy Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-30, August.
    18. Lin, Zhibin & Vlachos, Ilias, 2018. "An advanced analytical framework for improving customer satisfaction: A case of air passengers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 185-195.
    19. Wabukala, Benard M. & Bergland, Olvar & Mukisa, Nicholas & Adaramola, Muyiwa S. & Watundu, Susan & Orobia, Laura A. & Rudaheranwa, Nichodemus, 2024. "Electricity security in Uganda: Measurement and policy priorities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    20. Wei, Sen & Yang, Hanqing & Bai, Yu & Wang, Yuanqing, 2025. "Road safety assessment of small management units considering smart roadway retrofitting," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 28-41.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:179:y:2026:i:c:s0967070x25004937. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.