IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v175y2026ics0967070x25004184.html

Clustering users and non-users of shared and private e-bikes and e-scooters across three European cities: Typologies, spatial patterns, and policy implications

Author

Listed:
  • Adorean, Emanuel-Cristian
  • Nofre, Jordi
  • Moura, Filipe

Abstract

This study examines typologies of users and non-users of electric micromobility (e-micromobility) - covering private and shared e-bikes and e-scooters - across three European cities: Lisbon (Portugal), Madrid (Spain), and Cluj-Napoca (Romania). Based on 2304 survey responses, a multi-stage analytical framework was applied, combining Principal Component Analysis (PCA) with hierarchical clustering (Ward.D2) and statistical validation tests (Chi-square, Kruskal–Wallis, Dunn post hoc). Spatial analysis complemented the clustering through Global Moran's I, Local Indicators of Spatial Association (LISA), and Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) mapping. The analysis identified five stable and replicable clusters: Micromobility enthusiasts, Committed cyclists and scooterists, Flexible young-adults, Public transport defenders, and Car-dependents. These personas were consistent across cities, although their prevalence varied with local socio-demographic and mobility contexts. The most discriminant factors were main mode of transport, employment status, age and trip purpose. Spatial results showed low but significant autocorrelation, indicating that adoption is influenced more by socio-demographic and behavioural traits than by residential proximity. The findings contribute to the external validity of micromobility typologies and provide a basis for city-sensitive policies, including infrastructure provision, integration with public transport, and demand activation strategies tailored to distinct user profiles.

Suggested Citation

  • Adorean, Emanuel-Cristian & Nofre, Jordi & Moura, Filipe, 2026. "Clustering users and non-users of shared and private e-bikes and e-scooters across three European cities: Typologies, spatial patterns, and policy implications," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:175:y:2026:i:c:s0967070x25004184
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25004184
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103875?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samira Dibaj & Aryan Hosseinzadeh & Miloš N. Mladenović & Robert Kluger, 2021. "Where Have Shared E-Scooters Taken Us So Far? A Review of Mobility Patterns, Usage Frequency, and Personas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-27, October.
    2. Joao F. Bigotte & Filipa Ferrao, 2023. "The Future Role of Shared E-Scooters in Urban Mobility: Preliminary Findings from Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Elena Carrara & Rebecca Ciavarella & Stefania Boglietti & Martina Carra & Giulio Maternini & Benedetto Barabino, 2021. "Identifying and Selecting Key Sustainable Parameters for the Monitoring of e-Powered Micro Personal Mobility Vehicles. Evidence from Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    4. Clare Field & Ihnji Jon, 2021. "E-Scooters: A New Smart Mobility Option? The Case of Brisbane, Australia," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 368-396, May.
    5. Veronika Harantová & Jaroslav Mazanec & Vladimíra Štefancová & Jaroslav Mašek & Hana Brůhová Foltýnová, 2023. "Two-Step Cluster Analysis of Passenger Mobility Segmentation during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Alberica Domitilla Bozzi & Anne Aguilera, 2021. "Shared E-Scooters: A Review of Uses, Health and Environmental Impacts, and Policy Implications of a New Micro-Mobility Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Laa, Barbara & Leth, Ulrich, 2020. "Survey of E-scooter users in Vienna: Who they are and how they ride," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    8. Cloud, Cannon & Heß, Simon & Kasinger, Johannes, 2023. "Shared e-scooter services and road safety: Evidence from six European countries," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    9. Matteo della Mura & Serena Failla & Nicolò Gori & Alfonso Micucci & Filippo Paganelli, 2022. "E-Scooter Presence in Urban Areas: Are Consistent Rules, Paying Attention and Smooth Infrastructure Enough for Safety?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-36, November.
    10. Teixeira, João Filipe & Silva, Cecília & Moura e Sá, Frederico, 2023. "Factors influencing modal shift to bike sharing: Evidence from a travel survey conducted during COVID-19," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    11. Shiva Pourfalatoun & Jubaer Ahmed & Erika E. Miller, 2023. "Shared Electric Scooter Users and Non-Users: Perceptions on Safety, Adoption and Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abouelela, Mohamed & Durán-Rodas, David & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2024. "Do we all need shared E-scooters? An accessibility-centered spatial equity evaluation approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    2. Öztürk, İbrahim & Akay, Nazlı, 2025. "Exploring attitudes and behavioural intentions towards e-scooter use in Türkiye: Differences between users and non-users," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    3. Szemere, Dorottya & Surman, Vivien, 2025. "Az elektromos rollerek integrációjának vizsgálata Magyarországon [The integration of electric scooters in Hungary]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 312-327.
    4. Bergh, Andreas & Mehic, Adrian & Sandberg, David & Wernberg, Joakim, 2025. "E-scooters and Traffic Accidents: Evidence from Staggered Roll-Out in Swedish Municipalities," Working Paper Series 1520, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    5. Zoi Christoforou & Christos Gioldasis & Yeltsin Valero & Grigoris Vasileiou-Voudouris, 2022. "Smart Traffic Data for the Analysis of Sustainable Travel Modes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Monika Hamerska & Monika Ziółko & Patryk Stawiarski, 2022. "A Sustainable Transport System—The MMQUAL Model of Shared Micromobility Service Quality Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Parnell, Katie J., 2025. "The gender data gap in e-micromobility research: A systematic review of gender reporting," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    8. Draženko Glavić & Ana Trpković & Marina Milenković & Sreten Jevremović, 2021. "The E-Scooter Potential to Change Urban Mobility—Belgrade Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, May.
    9. Tiziana Campisi & Anastasios Skoufas & Alexandros Kaltsidis & Socrates Basbas, 2021. "Gender Equality and E-Scooters: Mind the Gap! A Statistical Analysis of the Sicily Region, Italy," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, October.
    10. Wei, Daqin & Zhang, Hongyang & Tang, Wei & Gong, Jinrui & Mei, Zhenyu, 2025. "Investigating the influencing factors of cooperation between shared e-bikes and subway systems: A multivariate data analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    11. Rémy Le Boennec & Frédéric Salladarré, 2023. "Investigating the use of privately-owned micromobility modes for commuting in four European countries," Post-Print hal-04296400, HAL.
    12. Kelsey Sievert & Madeleine Roen & Curtis M. Craig & Nichole L. Morris, 2023. "A Survey of Electric-Scooter Riders’ Route Choice, Safety Perception, and Helmet Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, April.
    13. Apichaya Lilavanichakul & Rangrong Yoksan, 2023. "Development of Bioplastics from Cassava toward the Sustainability of Cassava Value Chain in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-21, October.
    14. Karimpour, Abolfazl & Hosseinzadeh, Aryan & Kluger, Robert, 2023. "A data-driven approach to estimating dockless electric scooter service areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    15. Chen, Shuting & Cao, Zhejing & Zhang, Xiaohu, 2025. "Adaptive scootability index: Built environment, travel purpose and e-scooter preferred route," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    16. Yang, Hongtai & Huo, Jinghai & Bao, Yongxing & Li, Xuan & Yang, Linchuan & Cherry, Christopher R., 2021. "Impact of e-scooter sharing on bike sharing in Chicago," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 23-36.
    17. Majerčák Jozef & Vakulenko Sergej Petrovich, 2023. "The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Population Mobility in the Czech Republic and Slovakia," LOGI – Scientific Journal on Transport and Logistics, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 158-168, January.
    18. Reckermann, Hauke & Grüner, Sebastian L. & Kowald, Matthias, 2025. "Investigating willingness to pay towards shared e-bikes: A comparison of methods," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    19. Shiva Pourfalatoun & Jubaer Ahmed & Erika E. Miller, 2023. "Shared Electric Scooter Users and Non-Users: Perceptions on Safety, Adoption and Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, June.
    20. Bergantino, Angela Stefania & Gardelli, Alessandro, 2024. "The contribution of e-scooters services to urban transport resilience," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:175:y:2026:i:c:s0967070x25004184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.