IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v171y2023icp29-43.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Submodularity of optimal sensor placement for traffic networks

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Ruolin
  • Mehr, Negar
  • Horowitz, Roberto

Abstract

The need for monitoring the state of a traffic network versus the costly installation and maintenance of roadside sensors constitutes the tough sensor placement problem in designing transportation networks. Placement problems naturally lie in the category of subset selection problems, which are known to be inherently combinatorial, and therefore, finding their exact solution is intractable for large problems. Due to this intractability, numerous heuristics have been proposed in the literature for approximately solving placement problems for traffic networks. Among these approaches, it has been observed that greedy algorithms normally outperform other heuristics. In this paper, we show the mathematics of why greedy algorithms are appropriate proxies for solving these subset selection problems; similar to placement problems for linear systems, placement problems for traffic networks also normally have a submodular structure. In this work, we analyze the problem of road sensor placement for transportation networks under different information structures available: when no vehicle routing information is available, when vehicles’ routings are known, and when it is necessary to maximize the number of origin–destination (O/D) traffic flows that are monitored with a set of sensors. We show that in all these cases, the placement problem has a submodular monotone structure. It is well known that the submodularity and monotonicity of discrete optimization problems can be leveraged to derive greedy algorithms that approximate the optimal solution. Consequently, our result is of great practical importance since by exploiting the submodularity and monotonicity of a problem, we show that it is possible to use polynomial-time greedy algorithms to approximate the combinatorial optimization problem with guaranteed optimality bounds for large problems, which are intractable to solve otherwise. Our results shed light upon the success of heuristic greedy algorithms that have been developed in some of the literature for solving placement problems at scale. To demonstrate the applicability of submodular optimization for solving placement problems, we first compare the performance of our polynomial-time approximation algorithm with the true optimum in an example traffic network which is small enough for finding the exact optimal solution with enumerating all possible subsets. Then, we investigate and validate our submodular approach in a case study involving a large-scale traffic network in Berkeley, California, where finding the exact optimal solution is intractable. Submodularity of the placement problem in these scenarios provides a powerful computational tool which can be further extended to other placement problem formulations that can become a reference for solving similar problems in the transportation literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Ruolin & Mehr, Negar & Horowitz, Roberto, 2023. "Submodularity of optimal sensor placement for traffic networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 29-43.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:171:y:2023:i:c:p:29-43
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2023.02.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261523000218
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2023.02.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fisher, M.L. & Nemhauser, G.L. & Wolsey, L.A., 1978. "An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions," LIDAM Reprints CORE 341, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    2. Fisher, M.L. & Nemhauser, G.L. & Wolsey, L.A., 1978. "An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions - 1," LIDAM Reprints CORE 334, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    3. Ehlert, Anett & Bell, Michael G.H. & Grosso, Sergio, 2006. "The optimisation of traffic count locations in road networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 460-479, July.
    4. Xuesong Zhou & George F. List, 2010. "An Information-Theoretic Sensor Location Model for Traffic Origin-Destination Demand Estimation Applications," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 254-273, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hyoshin (John) Park & Ali Haghani & Song Gao & Michael A. Knodler & Siby Samuel, 2018. "Anticipatory Dynamic Traffic Sensor Location Problems with Connected Vehicle Technologies," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 1299-1326, December.
    2. Dam, Tien Thanh & Ta, Thuy Anh & Mai, Tien, 2022. "Submodularity and local search approaches for maximum capture problems under generalized extreme value models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 953-965.
    3. Salari, Mostafa & Kattan, Lina & Lam, William H.K. & Lo, H.P. & Esfeh, Mohammad Ansari, 2019. "Optimization of traffic sensor location for complete link flow observability in traffic network considering sensor failure," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 216-251.
    4. Beck, Yasmine & Ljubić, Ivana & Schmidt, Martin, 2023. "A survey on bilevel optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 401-426.
    5. Rad Niazadeh & Negin Golrezaei & Joshua Wang & Fransisca Susan & Ashwinkumar Badanidiyuru, 2023. "Online Learning via Offline Greedy Algorithms: Applications in Market Design and Optimization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(7), pages 3797-3817, July.
    6. Alexandre D. Jesus & Luís Paquete & Arnaud Liefooghe, 2021. "A model of anytime algorithm performance for bi-objective optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 79(2), pages 329-350, February.
    7. Bin Liu & Miaomiao Hu, 2022. "Fast algorithms for maximizing monotone nonsubmodular functions," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 1655-1670, July.
    8. repec:dgr:rugsom:99a17 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Lehmann, Daniel, 2020. "Quality of local equilibria in discrete exchange economies," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 141-152.
    10. Eric DuBois & Ashley Peper & Laura A. Albert, 2023. "Interdicting Attack Plans with Boundedly Rational Players and Multiple Attackers: An Adversarial Risk Analysis Approach," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 202-219, September.
    11. Zhenning Zhang & Bin Liu & Yishui Wang & Dachuan Xu & Dongmei Zhang, 2022. "Maximizing a monotone non-submodular function under a knapsack constraint," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 1125-1148, July.
    12. Zhenning Zhang & Donglei Du & Yanjun Jiang & Chenchen Wu, 2021. "Maximizing DR-submodular+supermodular functions on the integer lattice subject to a cardinality constraint," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 80(3), pages 595-616, July.
    13. Awi Federgruen & Nan Yang, 2008. "Selecting a Portfolio of Suppliers Under Demand and Supply Risks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(4), pages 916-936, August.
    14. Chenggang Wang & Zengfu Wang & Xiong Xu & Yuhang Hao, 2021. "A balanced sensor scheduling for multitarget localization in a distributed multiple-input multiple-output radar network," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 17(7), pages 15501477211, July.
    15. Yanzhi Li & Zhicheng Liu & Chuchu Xu & Ping Li & Xiaoyan Zhang & Hong Chang, 2023. "Two-stage submodular maximization under curvature," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 1-16, March.
    16. Simon Bruggmann & Rico Zenklusen, 2019. "Submodular Maximization Through the Lens of Linear Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(4), pages 1221-1244, November.
    17. Xiaojuan Zhang & Qian Liu & Min Li & Yang Zhou, 2022. "Fast algorithms for supermodular and non-supermodular minimization via bi-criteria strategy," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 3549-3574, December.
    18. Hans Kellerer & Vitaly A. Strusevich, 2016. "Optimizing the half-product and related quadratic Boolean functions: approximation and scheduling applications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 240(1), pages 39-94, May.
    19. Shaojie Tang & Jing Yuan, 2023. "Beyond submodularity: a unified framework of randomized set selection with group fairness constraints," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 1-22, May.
    20. Lu Han & Dachuan Xu & Donglei Du & Dongmei Zhang, 2018. "A local search approximation algorithm for the uniform capacitated k-facility location problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 409-423, February.
    21. Goldengorin, Boris & Tijssen, Gert A. & Tso, Michael, 1999. "The maximization of submodular functions : old and new proofs for the correctness of the dichotomy algorithm," Research Report 99A17, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:171:y:2023:i:c:p:29-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.