IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v171y2023icp29-43.html

Submodularity of optimal sensor placement for traffic networks

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Ruolin
  • Mehr, Negar
  • Horowitz, Roberto

Abstract

The need for monitoring the state of a traffic network versus the costly installation and maintenance of roadside sensors constitutes the tough sensor placement problem in designing transportation networks. Placement problems naturally lie in the category of subset selection problems, which are known to be inherently combinatorial, and therefore, finding their exact solution is intractable for large problems. Due to this intractability, numerous heuristics have been proposed in the literature for approximately solving placement problems for traffic networks. Among these approaches, it has been observed that greedy algorithms normally outperform other heuristics. In this paper, we show the mathematics of why greedy algorithms are appropriate proxies for solving these subset selection problems; similar to placement problems for linear systems, placement problems for traffic networks also normally have a submodular structure. In this work, we analyze the problem of road sensor placement for transportation networks under different information structures available: when no vehicle routing information is available, when vehicles’ routings are known, and when it is necessary to maximize the number of origin–destination (O/D) traffic flows that are monitored with a set of sensors. We show that in all these cases, the placement problem has a submodular monotone structure. It is well known that the submodularity and monotonicity of discrete optimization problems can be leveraged to derive greedy algorithms that approximate the optimal solution. Consequently, our result is of great practical importance since by exploiting the submodularity and monotonicity of a problem, we show that it is possible to use polynomial-time greedy algorithms to approximate the combinatorial optimization problem with guaranteed optimality bounds for large problems, which are intractable to solve otherwise. Our results shed light upon the success of heuristic greedy algorithms that have been developed in some of the literature for solving placement problems at scale. To demonstrate the applicability of submodular optimization for solving placement problems, we first compare the performance of our polynomial-time approximation algorithm with the true optimum in an example traffic network which is small enough for finding the exact optimal solution with enumerating all possible subsets. Then, we investigate and validate our submodular approach in a case study involving a large-scale traffic network in Berkeley, California, where finding the exact optimal solution is intractable. Submodularity of the placement problem in these scenarios provides a powerful computational tool which can be further extended to other placement problem formulations that can become a reference for solving similar problems in the transportation literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Ruolin & Mehr, Negar & Horowitz, Roberto, 2023. "Submodularity of optimal sensor placement for traffic networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 29-43.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:171:y:2023:i:c:p:29-43
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2023.02.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261523000218
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2023.02.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fisher, M.L. & Nemhauser, G.L. & Wolsey, L.A., 1978. "An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions - 1," LIDAM Reprints CORE 334, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    2. Ehlert, Anett & Bell, Michael G.H. & Grosso, Sergio, 2006. "The optimisation of traffic count locations in road networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 460-479, July.
    3. Fisher, M.L. & Nemhauser, G.L. & Wolsey, L.A., 1978. "An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions," LIDAM Reprints CORE 341, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    4. Xuesong Zhou & George F. List, 2010. "An Information-Theoretic Sensor Location Model for Traffic Origin-Destination Demand Estimation Applications," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 254-273, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xing, Jiping & Jia, Zhou & Wu, Tong & Tang, Tianli & Liu, Zhiyuan, 2026. "Bayesian optimization for traffic sensor deployment: Integrating network flow estimation into location planning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hyoshin (John) Park & Ali Haghani & Song Gao & Michael A. Knodler & Siby Samuel, 2018. "Anticipatory Dynamic Traffic Sensor Location Problems with Connected Vehicle Technologies," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 1299-1326, December.
    2. Dam, Tien Thanh & Ta, Thuy Anh & Mai, Tien, 2022. "Submodularity and local search approaches for maximum capture problems under generalized extreme value models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 953-965.
    3. Salari, Mostafa & Kattan, Lina & Lam, William H.K. & Lo, H.P. & Esfeh, Mohammad Ansari, 2019. "Optimization of traffic sensor location for complete link flow observability in traffic network considering sensor failure," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 216-251.
    4. Qi Luo & Viswanath Nagarajan & Alexander Sundt & Yafeng Yin & John Vincent & Mehrdad Shahabi, 2023. "Efficient Algorithms for Stochastic Ride-Pooling Assignment with Mixed Fleets," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(4), pages 908-936, July.
    5. Beck, Yasmine & Ljubić, Ivana & Schmidt, Martin, 2023. "A survey on bilevel optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 401-426.
    6. Valente, Matteo & Reniers, Genserik & Cozzani, Valerio, 2026. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Protection Barriers Against Fire-Induced Domino Effects in the Chemical and Process Industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 266(PB).
    7. Guanyi Wang, 2024. "Robust Network Targeting with Multiple Nash Equilibria," Papers 2410.20860, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.
    8. Yuval Filmus & Yasushi Kawase & Yusuke Kobayashi & Yutaro Yamaguchi, 2021. "Tight Approximation for Unconstrained XOS Maximization," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(4), pages 1599-1610, November.
    9. Jiaming Hu & Dachuan Xu & Donglei Du & Cuixia Miao, 2024. "Differentially private submodular maximization with a cardinality constraint over the integer lattice," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1-24, May.
    10. Suning Gong & Qingqin Nong & Jiazhu Fang & Ding-Zhu Du, 2024. "Algorithms for Cardinality-Constrained Monotone DR-Submodular Maximization with Low Adaptivity and Query Complexity," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 200(1), pages 194-214, January.
    11. Rad Niazadeh & Negin Golrezaei & Joshua Wang & Fransisca Susan & Ashwinkumar Badanidiyuru, 2023. "Online Learning via Offline Greedy Algorithms: Applications in Market Design and Optimization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(7), pages 3797-3817, July.
    12. Averbakh, Igor & Berman, Oded, 1996. "Locating flow-capturing units on a network with multi-counting and diminishing returns to scale," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 495-506, June.
    13. Alexandre D. Jesus & Luís Paquete & Arnaud Liefooghe, 2021. "A model of anytime algorithm performance for bi-objective optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 79(2), pages 329-350, February.
    14. Bin Liu & Miaomiao Hu, 2022. "Fast algorithms for maximizing monotone nonsubmodular functions," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 43(5), pages 1655-1670, July.
    15. repec:dgr:rugsom:99a17 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Omar El Housni & Huseyin Topaloglu, 2023. "Joint Assortment Optimization and Customization Under a Mixture of Multinomial Logit Models: On the Value of Personalized Assortments," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(4), pages 1197-1215, July.
    17. Tami Tamir & Benny Vaksendiser, 2010. "Algorithms for storage allocation based on client preferences," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 304-324, April.
    18. Lehmann, Daniel, 2020. "Quality of local equilibria in discrete exchange economies," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 141-152.
    19. Michael Kahr & Markus Leitner & Ivana Ljubić, 2024. "The Impact of Passive Social Media Viewers in Influence Maximization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 1362-1381, December.
    20. Anthony Kim & Vahab Mirrokni & Hamid Nazerzadeh, 2021. "Deals or No Deals: Contract Design for Online Advertising," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 69(5), pages 1450-1467, September.
    21. Levi DeValve & Saša Pekeč & Yehua Wei, 2023. "Approximate Submodularity in Network Design Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(4), pages 1021-1039, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:171:y:2023:i:c:p:29-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.